Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 45, Issue 5, pp 1401–1405 | Cite as

Effects of short aging on thickening anisotropy of θ′ precipitate and mechanical properties of severe cold-rolled 2519A aluminum alloy plate

  • Xin-ming Zhang
  • Zhi-guo Gao
  • Yi-sheng Zhao
Letter

The commercial 2519 aluminum alloy is a primary material for structural components of aircrafts, helicopters, and amphibians because of its low specific density, which favors the selection of aluminum alloys in weight-critical applications [1, 2]. To promote the mechanical properties of the alloys, severe plastic deformation (SPD) processes were explored such as equal channel angular pressing and severe cold rolling (SCR) [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. However, 2519A aluminum alloy for a new version of Al–Cu alloy was developed as armor material and scarcely fabricated by SPD processes. Valiev has reported that alloys produced by the SPD processes have increased strength with limited ductility [9]. The increase in strength of 5083 aluminum alloy is always accompanied by a loss in ductility [10]. A combination of equal channel angular pressing and low-temperature aging resulted in significant improvements in both ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and ductility in AA6061 and Al–10%Ag alloy [11, 12]....

Keywords

Ductility Aluminum Alloy Ultimate Tensile Strength Differential Scanning Calorimeter Aging Temperature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Fisher JJ Jr, Kramer LS, Pickens JR (2002) Adv Mater Process 160:43Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kramer LS, Blair TP, Blough SD, Fisher JJ Jr, Pickens JR (2002) J Mater Eng Perform 11:645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yanagida A, Joko K, Azushima A (2008) J Mater Process Technol 201:390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lv ZQ, Sun SH, Wang ZH, Qv MG, Jiang P, Fu WT (2008) Mater Sci Eng A 489:107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shanmugasundaram T, Murty BS, Subramanya Sarma V (2006) Scripta Mater 54:2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pushin VG, Stolyarov VV, Valiev RZ, Lowe TC, Zhu YT (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 410–411:386Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krasilnikov N, Lojkowski W, Pakiela Z, Valiev R (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 397:330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saha R, Ray RK (2007) Scripta Mater 57:841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Valiev R (2004) Nat Mater 3:511CrossRefPubMedADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rangaraju N, Raghuram T, Vamsi Krishna B, Prasad Rao K, Venugopal P (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 398:246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim JK, Kim HK, Park JW, Kim WJ (2005) Scripta Mater 53:1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Horita Z, Ohashi K, Fujita T, Kaneko K, Langdon TG (2005) Adv Mater 17:1599CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Materials Science and EngineeringCentral South UniversityChangshaPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Shenzhen PolytechnicShenzhenPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations