Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 44, Issue 16, pp 4379–4382 | Cite as

Determination of the fibre volume content in natural fibre-reinforced composites by ultimate analysis



Natural fibre-reinforced plastics (NFRP) with renewable polymers as matrices are expected to be an increasing market in the future. In this context the quantification of natural fibre volume content in composites is an important parameter for manufacturers to check the laminate quality. This paper reports a new time and cost efficient method for the determination of natural fibre volume content with a good reproducibility. The measurement of the natural fibre volume content is attributed to the quantification of the total carbon content of the composite as sum parameter determined by chemical ultimate analysis never used for fibre-reinforced plastics before. The differentiation of resin matrix and natural fibre is possible by accounting the different carbon fractions of both components. The fibre weight content can be determined from the detected total carbon of the test samples after the measurement of a calibration line from mix standards. Based on the known densities of the natural fibre and of the resin matrix, the fibre weight content is converted into the corresponding volume content. The fibre volume content of porous and also compact composite parts can be calculated by this approach. The fibre volume content can be measured by this method with a standard deviation of ±1%.


Natural Fibre Methacrylic Acid Calibration Line Ultimate Analysis Total Carbon Content 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Witten E (2008) In: Manual of the 11th international AVK conference, Essen, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu Z, Erhan SZ, Akin DE, Barton FE (2006) J Agric Food Chem 54:2134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Larbig H, Scherzer H, Sahike B, Poltrock R (1998) J Cell Plastics 34:361Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bledzki AK, Gassan J (1999) Prog Polym Sci 24:221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hornsby PR, Hinrichsen E, Tarverdi K (1997) J Mater Sci 32:443. doi: 10.1023/A:1018521920738 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hornsby PR, Hinrichsen E, Tarverdi K (1997) J Mater Sci 32:1009. doi: 10.1023/A:1018578322498 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jiang L, Hinrichsen G (1999) Die Angewandte Makromolekulare Chemie 268:13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    ASTM D 3171-76, 1990Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barton FE, Akin DE, Morrison WH, Ulrich A, Archibald D (2002) J Agric Food Chem 50:7576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fink HP, Bohn A, Pinnow M, Kunze J (2004) In: 5th global wood and natural fibre composites symposium, Kassel Germany, 27–28 April 2004Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.German Aerospace Centre (DLR), Institute of Composite Structures and Adaptive SystemsBraunschweigGermany

Personalised recommendations