Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 44, Issue 15, pp 4104–4111 | Cite as

Smart composites of urethane elastomers with carbonyl iron

  • Anna Boczkowska
  • Stefan F. Awietjan


Smart composites based on carbonyl-iron particles in a polyurethane matrix, known as magnetorheological elastomers (MREs), were manufactured and studied. The influence of ferromagnetic particle content and particle arrangement in relation to an external magnetic field was investigated. Several different elastomers with different stiffnesses were used as matrices. It was found that the structure of a fabricated MRE depends on the viscosity of the matrix before curing and the flux density of the applied magnetic field. Two different magnetic field strengths were used: 0.1 and 0.3 T. The amount of carbonyl iron particles was varied from 1.5 to 33.0 vol%. Scanning electron microscopy technique was used to observe MRE microstructure. The particles’ orientation and their arrangement were also investigated by vibrating sample magnetometer. A correlation was found between MRE microstructure and magnetic properties. Compression tests on cylindrical samples in the presence and absence of a magnetic field showed that a magnetic field increased the stiffness of the material. Additionally the rheological properties of MREs were tested in a magnetic field. It was found that the amount of ferromagnetic particles and their arrangement have a significant influence on the rheological properties of MREs. The highest relative change of storage modulus under 200 mT magnetic field, equal to 282%, was recorded for samples with 11.5 vol% of particles.


External Magnetic Field Storage Modulus Iron Particle Anisotropy Coefficient Ferromagnetic Particle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This study is financed as a R&D Project from funds of the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (Grant no. NR15 0010 04).


  1. 1.
    Zhou GY (2003) Smart Mater Struct 12:139CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Farshad M, Benine A (2004) Polym Test 23:347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jolly MR, Carlson JD, Munoz BC, Bullions TA (1996) J Intel Mater Syst Struct 7:613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khoo M, Liu C (2001) Sens Actuat A Phys 89:259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carlson JD, Jolly MR (2000) Mechatronics 10:555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Varga Z, Filipcsei G, Zrinyi M (2005) Polymer 46:7779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    An Y, Shaw MT (2003) Smart Mater Struct 12:157CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lokander M, Stenberg B (2003) Polym Test 22:245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Banks HT, Pinter GA, Potter LK, Gaitens MJ, Yanyo LC (1999) J Intel Mater Syst Struct 10:116Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu B, Shaw MT (2001) J Intel Mater Syst Struct 12:57Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lokander M, Stenberg B (2003) Polym Test 22:677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Farshad M, Le Roux M (2004) Polym Test 23:855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kallio M, Aalto S, Lindroos T, Jarvinen E, Karna T, Meinander T (2003) In: Proceedings of AMAS workshop on smart materials and structures, SMART’03, Jadwisin, pp 353–360Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lokander M, Reitberger T, Stenberg B (2004) Polym Degrad Stabil 86:467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Farshad M, Le Roux M (2005) Polym Test 24:163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boczkowska A, Awietjan S.F, Wejrzanowski T, Kurzydłowski K.J (2009) J Mater Sci, in pressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Materials Science and EngineeringWarsaw University of Technology (WUT)WarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations