Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 44, Issue 13, pp 3504–3507 | Cite as

Vicker’s microhardness of Bi1−x Sb x (x = 0.05–0.30) crystals

  • C. F. Desai
  • Maunik Jani
  • P. H. Soni
  • G. R. Pandya
Article

Abstract

The solid–liquid interface of Bi1−x Sb x crystal growth is very favorable for investigations of electron–phonon phenomena. Bismuth is a semimetal with high electron and hole mobilities. When Bi is doped with Sb in the range of 7–22 atomic percentage, it undergoes semimetal–semiconductor transition. Interest in Bi–Sb materials system has recently been stimulated due to promise of a new generation of thermoelectric materials based on these alloys. The starting materials used in this study, Bi and Sb, were both of 99.999% purity. The authors have studied microhardness of these crystals with the above said composition range. The crystals were grown using Zone melting method with 0.35 cm/h growth speed and 25 zone passes. The indentation method is the most widely used method for measurement of hardness of the crystals either of metallic or nonmetallic nature. This method does not require large specimens and even on a small specimen a number of measurements can be carried out. Microhardness indentation tests were carried out on the cleavage planes (111) of the Bi1−x Sb x (x = 0.5 to 0.30) crystals, using the Vickers diamond pyramidal indenter. The results of Vickers microhardness studies on Bi1−x Sb x (x = 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, 0.25, 0.30) are presented in this paper.

Keywords

Antimony Vickers Hardness Indentation Mark Antimony Concentration Microhardness Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Jain AL (1959) Phys Rev 114:1518CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Golin S (1968) Phys Rev 176:830CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tichovolski EJ, Mavroides JG (1969) Solid State Commun 7:927CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oelfart G, Schneider G, Kaak W, Hermann R (1976) Phys Status Solidi B 74:K75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lenoir B, Cassart M, Michenaud JP, Scherrer H, Scherrer S (1996) J Phys Chem Solids 57:89CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brown DM, Silverman SJ (1964) Phys Rev 136:A290CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mendez EE, Misu A, Dresslhaus MS (1981) Phys Rev B 24:639CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lu M, Zieve RJ, Van Hulst A, Jaeger HM, Rosenbaum TF, Radelaar S (1996) Phys Rev B 53:1609CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Walls MG, Chaudhri MM, Tang TB (1992) J Phys D Appl Phys (UK) 25(3):500CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Desai CF, Soni PH, Bhavsar SR (1999) Indian J Pure Appl Phys 37:119Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pandya GR, Desai CF, Bhavsar SR, Soni PH (1999) Indian J Eng Mater Sci 6:237Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boysarskaya YuS, Grabko DZ, Dintu MP (1981) Cryst Res Technol 16:441Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Buckle H (1973) In: Westbrok JH, Conrad H (eds) The science of hardness testing and its research applications. ASM, Ohio, p 453Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Singh NL, Desai CF, Shah N, Soni PH, Shrinet V, Avasthi DK (2002) J Marco Mol Sci Pure Appl Chem A39(3):231CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. F. Desai
    • 1
  • Maunik Jani
    • 1
  • P. H. Soni
    • 1
  • G. R. Pandya
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics, Faculty of ScienceThe M. S. University of BarodaVadodaraIndia

Personalised recommendations