Skip to main content
Log in

Viscoelasticity studies for a fibrous collagen material: chrome-free leather

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chrome-free leather such as glutaraldehyde-tanned leather behaves very differently from chrome-tanned leather. Information regarding its viscoelasticity has not been previously reported. Hysteresis and stress relaxation are two essential properties associated with viscoelasticity. We have designed a cyclic tensile test to measure these properties to gain insight into the structural difference between chrome-free and chrome-tanned leather. Observations revealed that chrome-free leather tanned with glutaraldehyde has a higher hysteresis than chrome-tanned leather. Stress relaxation experiments, on the other hand showed chrome-free leather has very similar relaxation curves as chrome-tanned leather. Both leathers demonstrate a rapid decrease in stress for the first few seconds followed by a much slower decay thereafter. The chrome-free leather, however, has a greater initial stress than chrome-tanned leather, indicating a higher stiffness than chrome-tanned leather. Moreover, observations showed the viscoelasticity of leather was affected significantly by its fatliquor content. A decrease of loading energy in a cyclic stress–strain experiment resulted from higher fatliquor content in leather.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wolf G, Breth M, Igl G (2001) J Am Leather Chemists Assoc 96:111

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Palop R (2003) Leather International, May 2003, 27–33

  3. Schwaiger W (2001) Leather International, July 2001, 28–30

  4. Fennen J (2003) 99th American Leather Chemist Association annual meeting, June 2003, 19–22

  5. Liu C-K, Latona NP, Lee J (2005) J Am Leather Chemists Assoc 100:8

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liu C-K, Latona NP (2006) J Am Leather Chemists Assoc 101:330

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liu C-K, Latona NP, Lee J (2005) J Am Leather Chemists Assoc 100:102

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu C-K, Latona NP, Cooke P (2007) J Am Leather Chemists Assoc 102:68

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu C-K, Dimaio GL (2000) J Am Leather Chemists Assoc 95:102

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu C-K, Dimaio GL (2001) J Am Leather Chemists Assoc 96:243

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liu C-K, Latona NP, Dimaio GL (2002) J Am Leather Chemists Assoc 97:284

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu C-K, Latona NP, Dimaio GL (2002) J Am Leather Chemists Assoc 96:243

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liu C-K, Latona NP, Dimaio GL (2002) J Am Leather Chemists Assoc 97:329

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fein ML, Harris EH Jr, Naghski J, Filachione EM (1959) J Am Leather Chemists Assoc 54:488

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Filachione EM, Fein ML, Harris EH Jr, Luvisi FP, Korn AH, Windus W, Naghski J (1959) J Am Leather Chemists Assoc 54:668

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fein ML, Filachione EM, Naghski J, Harris EH Jr (1963) J Am Leather Chemists Assoc 58:202

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Filachione EM, Fein ML, Harris EH Jr (1964) J Am Leather Chemists Assoc 59:378

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Filachione EM, Fein ML, Harris EH Jr (1964) J Am Leather Chemists Assoc 59:281

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Morton WE, Hearle JWS (1978) Physical properties of textile fibers. The Textile Institute, Manchester and London, p 322

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liu C-K, Latona NP, Dimaio GL, Cooke PH (2007). J Am Leather Chemists Assoc 102:191

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kronick PL, Thayer P (1989) J Am Leather Chemists Assoc 84:257

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liu C-K, Latona NP (2002) J Mater Sci 37:3827. DOI: 10.1023/A:1019678716389

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu C-K, McClintick MD (1999) J Am Leather Chemists Assoc 94:8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu C-K, Dimaio GL (2000) J Am Leather Chemists Assoc 95:170

    Google Scholar 

  25. Liu C-K, Latona NP, Dimaio GL (2001) J Am Leather Chemists Assoc 96:367

    Google Scholar 

  26. Liu C-K, Latona NP, Dimaio GL (2002) J Am Leather Chemists Assoc 97:389

    Google Scholar 

  27. Liu C-K, McClintick MD (1997) J Am Leather Chemists Assoc 92:157

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ferry JD (1980) Viscoelastic properties of polymers. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  29. Whittaker RE (1975) J Soc Leather Tech Chem 59:172

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Mr. Joe Lee for his help in our research tannery and Dr. Lihan Huang for his invaluable suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng-Kung Liu.

Additional information

Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, CK., Latona, N.P., DiMaio, G.L. et al. Viscoelasticity studies for a fibrous collagen material: chrome-free leather. J Mater Sci 42, 8509–8516 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-1744-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-1744-1

Keywords

Navigation