Mechanical properties of alkali treated plant fibres and their potential as reinforcement materials II. Sisal fibres
- 286 Downloads
The tensile strength and Young’s modulus of sisal fibre bundles were determined following alkalisation. The results were then analysed with respect to the diameter and internal structure such as cellulose content, crystallinity index and micro-fibril angle. The tensile strength and stiffness were found to vary with varying concentration of caustic soda, which also had a varying effect on the cell wall morphological structure such as the primary wall and secondary wall. The optimum tensile strength and Young’s modulus were obtained at 0.16% NaOH by weight. The stiffness of the sisal fibre bundles obtained using the cellulose content also referred to as the micro-fibril content was compared with the stiffness determined using the crystallinity index. The stiffness obtained using the crystallinity index was found to be higher than that obtained using the cellulose content however, the difference was insignificant. Alkalisation was found to change the internal structure of sisal fibres that exhibited specific stiffness that was approximately the same as that of steel. These results indicates that the structure of sisal fibre can be chemically modified to attain properties that will make the fibre useful as a replacement for synthetic fibres where high stiffness requirement is not a pre-requisite and that it can be used as a reinforcement for the manufacture of composite materials.
KeywordsTensile Strength Composite Material Internal Structure Reinforcement Material Morphological Structure
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.R. E. MARK, In “Theory and design of wood and fibre composite materials”, edited by B. A. Jayne, (Syracuse University Press, New York 1972) p. 49.Google Scholar
- 2.T. NGUYEN, E. ZAVARIN and E. M. BARRALL, J. MACROM, Sci. Rev. Macrom. Chem. C20 (1981) 1.Google Scholar
- 4.D. R. PERRY, “Identification of textile materials, The Textile Institute” (Manara Printing Services, London 1975).Google Scholar
- 5.J. ROBSON, J. HAGUE, G. NEWMAN, G. JERONIMIDIS and M. P. ANSELL, Survey of natural materials for use in structural composites as reinforcement and matrices, Report No. EC/431/92 to DTI LINK Structural Composites Committee, Bangor, (1993)Google Scholar
- 6.L. Y. MWAIKAMBO and M. P. ANSELL, J. Mater. Sci. (2003) (Submitted)Google Scholar
- 7.W. E. MORTON and J. W. S. HEARLE, in “Physical Properties of Textile Fibres” (The Textile Institute, Heinemann, London, 1975) p. 1.Google Scholar
- 9.J. BODIG and B. A. JAYNE, in “Mechanics of Wood Composites” (Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc., New York, 1982) p. 335.Google Scholar
- 16.X. LU, M. Q. ZHANG, M. Z. RONG, D. L. YUE and G. C. YANG, Polym. and Polym. Comp. in printGoogle Scholar
- 18.L. Y. MWAIKAMBO, to be submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- 19.D. J. JOHNSON, in “Applied Fibre Science,” Vol. 3, edited by F. Happey, (Academic Press, London 1979) p. 127.Google Scholar
- 23.G. C. DAVIES and D. M. BRUCE, Textile Res. J. 68 (1998) 623.Google Scholar