Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 41, Issue 7, pp 1945–1952 | Cite as

Effect of Mg content and solution treatment on the microstructure of Al-Si-Cu-Mg alloys

  • Ismeli Alfonso
  • Cuauhtemoc Maldonado
  • Gonzalo Gonzalez
  • Arnoldo Bedolla


Three different quaternary alloys Al-6Si-3Cu-xMg (x = 0.59, 3.80 and 6.78 wt.%) were produced using conventional ingot casting metallurgy. The study was focused to investigate the effect of magnesium and solution heat treatment on the microstructure. Results shown variations in composition and morphology for the silicon-rich phases as well as a change of the predominant copper-rich phase Al2Cu (θ) to Al5Cu2Mg8Si6 (Q phase) when magnesium content is increased. The amount of Mg in solid solution was constant for the three different cast-alloys, increasing considerably after solution heat treatment to 2.7 at.% for the alloy with higher Mg content This fact allowed to obtain Cu:Mg ratios (in at.%) in solid solution lower than 1.0 for the alloys with 3.80 and 6.78 Mg wt.%, impossible to reach for the alloy with low Mg content. During dissolution process, Al2Cu phase was observed to be more suitable to dissolve than Q phase. Fragmentation, spheroidization and coarsening of Q and silicon-rich phases were observed. Solution time required for these processes occurrence was longer for Q phase. Solution heat treatments at 480°C for 12 h were found to be appropriate for the studied alloys.


Polymer Microstructure Magnesium Heat Treatment Solid Solution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. E. HATCH, in “Aluminium, Properties and Physical Metallurgy” (American Society for Metals, USA, 1993) p. 232.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. OUELLET and F. H. SAMUEL, J. Mater. Sci. 34 (1999) 4671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. M. GOMES, T. SATO and H. TEZUKA, Mater. Sci. Forum Vols. 217–222 (1996) 793.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. MURAYAMA, K. HONO, M. SAGA and M. KIKUSHI, Mater. Sci. and Eng. A 250 (1998) 132.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Z. LI, A. M. SAMUEL, F. H. SAMUEL, C. RAVINDRAN and S. VALTIERRA, J. Mater. Sci. 38 (2003) 1203.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. H. SAMUEL, J. Mater. Sci. 33 (1998) 2284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Q. WANG, X. F. BIAN, W. M. WANG and J. Y. ZHANG, Mater. Letters. 57 (2003) 4083.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. LASA and J. M. RODRIGUEZ-IBABE, Mater. Charact. 48 (2002) 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. S. WANG, S. L. LEE and J. C. LIN, J. Mater. Res. 15 (2000) 2035.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. OGRIS, H. LUCHINGER and P. J. UGGOWITZER, Mater. Sci. Forum. 396–402 (2002) 152.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. WERNER. Z. METALLK. 81 (1990) 786.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. W. MARTIN and R. D. DOHERTY, in “Stability of Microstructures in Metallic Systems” (Cambridge University Press, London, 1980).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. K. GUPTA, A. K. JENA and M. C. CHATURVEDI, Mater. Sci. Tech. (1987) 1023.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ismeli Alfonso
    • 1
  • Cuauhtemoc Maldonado
    • 1
  • Gonzalo Gonzalez
    • 1
  • Arnoldo Bedolla
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Investigaciones MetalurgicasUniversidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de HidalgoMexico

Personalised recommendations