Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 1381–1387 | Cite as

The rheological behavior of ceramic/polymer mixtures for coextrusion processing

  • X. Xu
  • G. E. Hilmas


Coextrusion is a novel fabrication method for ceramic processing. However, the rheological behavior of ceramic/polymer blends during batching and extrusion in a coextrusion process is not well understood. In this study, the rheological properties of BaTiO3/polymer mixtures during batching in a high-shear rate mixer (C.W. Brabender) were investigated and several models were evaluated. The BaTiO3/polymer mixtures exhibited shear thinning behavior with a yield stress. The power-law model still fit for the data obtained from the high-shear rate mixer in the tested shear rate range. The results also showed that Bousmina’s model only fits well for the pure polymer melts. For the ceramic/polymer mixtures, large deviations from Bousmina’s model were observed.


Torque Shear Rate Roller Speed Pure Polymer Shear Rate Range 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We would like to thank Amanda Young (UMR) and John Suwarbi (Rheometric Scientific Co.) for their valuable input to this research.


  1. 1.
    Butler TI (1992) Tappi J Sept., p 205Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pearce DH, Button TW (1999) In: Lee WE, Derby B (eds) Engineering With Ceramics. IOM Communications, London, [England], No. 59Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beeaff DR, Hilmas GE (2002) J Mater Sci 37:1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Polzin BJ, Cruse TA, Houston RL, Picciolo JJ, Singh D, Goretta KC (2000) In: Bansal NP, Singh JP, Ustundag E (eds) Ceramic Transactions, vol 103, Advances in Ceramic-Matrix Composites V. American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, p 237Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hilmas GE, Huang T, Fang Z, White B, Griffo A (2002) In: Advances in Ceramic Matrix Composites VIII, Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the Am. Ceram. Soc. St. Louis, MO, April 2002. American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, 2002, p 26Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoy CV, Barda A, Griffith M, Halloran JW (1998) J Am Ceram Soc 81(1):152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crumm AT, Halloran JW (1998) J Am Ceram Soc 81(4):1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fang Z, Griffo A, White B, Lockwood G, Belnap D, Hilmas G, Bitler J (2001) Intl J Refrac Metals Hard Maters 19(4–6):453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koh YH, Kim HW, Kim HE (2002) J Am Ceram Soc 85(10):2578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kovar D, Thouless MD, Halloran JW (1998) J Am Ceram Soc 81(4):1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goodrich JE, Porter RS (1967) Poly Eng Sci 7:45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blyer LL, Danne JH (1967) Poly Eng Sci 7:178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee GCN, Purdon JR (1969) Poly Eng Sci 9(5):360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marquez A, Quijano J, Gaulin M (1996) Poly Eng Sci 36(20):2556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bousmina M, Ait-Kadi A, Faisant JB (1999) J Rheol 43(2):415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brady GA, Hilmas GE, Halloran JW (1995) In: Hausner H, Messing GL, Hirano S (eds) Ceramic Transactions, vol 51, Ceramic processing science and technology. American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, p. 297Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kromer HM (1978) In: Introduction to Torque Rheometry. Saddle Brook, N.J., p 22Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wright JF Jr, Reed JS (2001) Am Ceram Soc Bull 80(4):31Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of Missouri-RollaRollaUSA

Personalised recommendations