Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 42, Issue 9, pp 3107–3116 | Cite as

Bond performance of reinforcing bars in inorganic polymer concrete (IPC)

  • M. Sofi
  • J. S. J. van Deventer
  • P. A. Mendis
  • G. C. Lukey
Advances in Geopolymer Science & Technology


The basic mechanical and chemical properties of fly-ash-based inorganic polymer concretes (IPC) have been studied widely, but, key engineering and structural properties of the material for instance modulus of elasticity, compressive, tensile, flexural strengths and bonding strength of the material to reinforcement have received little attention. Structural applications of reinforced IPC depend on the bond performance of the material to the reinforcement. Due to their difference with ordinary Portland cement (OPC) based concrete in terms of chemical reaction and matrix formation it is not known whether IPC exhibit different bonding performance with the reinforcement. Simply relying on compressive strength of the material and extrapolating models and equations meant for OPC based concrete may lead to unsafe design of structural members. To that end, 27 beam-end specimens, 58 cubic direct pullout type specimens and number of laboratory test specimens were tested to evaluate bonding performance of IPC with reinforcement. The results of beam-end specimens and direct pullout type specimens correlate favourably, although the results of direct pullout tests are in general more conservative than those of beam-end specimens. Overall, it can be concluded that bond performance of IPC mixes are comparable to OPC based concrete and therefore IPC and steel can be used as a composite material to resist tension in addition to compression.


Compressive Strength Ordinary Portland Cement Coarse Aggregate Bond Stress Splitting Tensile Strength 


  1. 1.
    Phair JW, van Deventer JSJ, Smith JD (2004) Appl Chem 19(3):423Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Glukovskii VD, Rostovskaja GS, Rumina GV (1980) Commun 7th Int Cong Chem Cement 3:164Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yip CK (2004) The Role of Calcium in Geopolymerisation. PhD Thesis, The University of Melbourne, Department of Chemical Engineering, Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van Jaarsveld, JGS (2000) The Physical and Chemical Characterisation of Fly Ash Based Geopolymers. PhD Thesis, The University of Melbourne, Department of Chemical Engineering, Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davidovits J, Davidovics M (1988) Ceramic Eng Sci Process 9(7–8):835Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    van Jaarsveld JGS, van Deventer JSJ (1999) Cement Concrete Res 29:1189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davidovits J (1994) Properties of Geopolymer Cements. First International Conference on Alkaline Cements and Concretes, Scientific Research Institute on Binders and Materials, vol 1. Kiev State Technical University, Kiev, Ukraine, 131–149Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carroll D, Dougherty A, Nisbet M, O’Hare A (1998) U.S. Portland cement industry, concrete and global climate, Proceedings of the 1998 91st Annual Meeting and Exhibition, 98-MA7.04, 9pp, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, San Diego, CA, USA, 9Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xu A (1997) In: Chandra S (ed) Waste materials used in concrete manufacturing. Noyes Publications, Westwood, NJ, USA, pp 141–173Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Priori L, Salvaderi L (2003) Limiting the Greenhouses Gases: A possible Italian strategy in the European Framework, 2003 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, Jul 13–17 2003, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Toronto, Ont., Canada, 2000–2003Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Malhotra VM (1999) Indian Concrete J 73(10):609Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Madaan DS, Kukreja CB, Sastry VV (1979) Indian Concrete J 53(11):294Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wong YL, Lam L, Poon CS, Zhou FP (1999) Cement Concrete Res 29(12):1905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee CY, Lee HK, Lee KM (2003) Cement and Concrete Res 33(3):425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shi C, Qian J (2003) Energ Source 25(6):617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shi C, Day LR (1996) Cement Concrete Res 26(9):537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xu A, Sarkar SL (1991) Cement and Concrete Res 21(6):1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Davidovits J (1987) Concrete Int 9:23Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    van Jaarsveld JGS, van Deventer JSJ, Lukey GC (2004) Chem Eng Commun 191(4):531Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Feng D, Tan H, van Deventer JSJ (2004) J Mater Sci 39(2):571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xu H, van Deventer JSJ (2003) Ind Eng Chem Res 42(8):698Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee WKW, van Deventer JSJ (2004) Cement Concrete Res 34(2):195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Malone PG, Kirkpatrick T, Randall CA (1986) “Potential Applications of Alkali-activated Alumino Silicate Binders in Military Operations”, WES/MP/GL-85-15, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MississipiGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Warner RF, Rangan BV, Hall AS, Faulkes KA (1998) Concrete structures. Ed. Longman, Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mendis PA, French CW (2000) Adv Struct Eng J 3(3):245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    ASTM C 234-91 (1991) Standard Test Method for Comparing Concrete on the Basis of the Bond Developed with Reinforced Steel, ASTM Annual Book of Standards, West Conshohocken, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Abrishami HH, Mitchell D (1996) J Struct Eng 122(3):255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cairns J, Abdullah R (1995) Struct Eng 73(11):179Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Choi OC, Hadje-Ghaffari H, Darwin D, McCabe SL (1990) ACI Mater J 88(2):207Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    ASTM A 944-99 (2000) Standard test method for comparing bond strength of steel reinforcing bars to concrete using beam-end specimens. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, West Conshohocken, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yip CK, Lukey GC, Van Deventer JSJ (2005) The coexistence of geopolymeric gel and calcium silicate hydrate at the early stage of alkaline activation. Cement Concrete Res 35(9):1688Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Phair JW (2001) Compositional effects and microstructure of fly ash based geopolymers. PhD Thesis, Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lee WKW, van Deventer JSJ (2001) The Addition of Chemical Additives to Control the Setting Speed of Geopolymeric Binders, Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Chemical Engineering, CD-ROM, Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sofi M, van Deventer JSJ, Mendis PA, Lukey GC (2006) Engineering properties of inorganic polymer concretes (IPCs). Cement and Concrete Res (In press)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sofi, M (2003) Bond Performance of Reinforcing Bars in Geopolymer Concretes. Masters Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Melbourne University, Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    AS 3600 (2001) Concrete Structures Code, Standard Association of Australia, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Beeby AW (1995) Designers’ Handbook to Eurocode 2, London: T. Telford; New York: American Society of Civil EngineersGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    ACI 318 – 02 (2002) “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete”, Reported by ACI Committee 318Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Neville AM (1996) Properties of concrete, 4th edn. John Wiley and Sons, IncGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Orangun CO, Jirsa JO, Breen JE (1977) J ACI 74(11):14Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Darwin D, Ebenezer KG (1993) ACI Mater J 90(6):46Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tepfers R (1973) A theory of bond applied to overlapped tensile reinforcement splices for deformed bars, Chalmers University of Technology, GoteborgGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Sofi
    • 1
  • J. S. J. van Deventer
    • 2
  • P. A. Mendis
    • 1
  • G. C. Lukey
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringThe University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Chemical and Biomolecular EngineeringThe University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations