Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 42, Issue 9, pp 3131–3137 | Cite as

Novel geopolymer based composites with enhanced ductility

  • Q. Zhao
  • B. Nair
  • T. Rahimian
  • P. Balaguru
Advances in Geopolymer Science & Technology

Abstract

Geopolymer materials have been proposed for various applications due to their excellent fire resistance and low processing cost. One requirement that geopolymer composites need to meet for structural applications is graceful failure, as catastrophic failure during service can result in significant loss of life. In this paper, the properties of novel low cost composites made by infiltrating stainless steel mesh with geopolymer resin are reported. Four point flexure tests on these composites showed metal-like yielding behavior instead of catastrophic failure and the “yield strength” was significantly higher than the flexure strength of the geopolymer matrix. Exposure to high temperatures, 800 and 1,050°C, resulted in the “yield strength” decreasing to ∼59 and ∼44% level respectively compared to the strength of as-processed samples. However, the good ductility was still retained after the high temperature treatment, which makes this novel composite a strong candidate for the applications where catastrophic failure upon fire/high temperature exposure needs to be avoided.

Keywords

Geopolymer Catastrophic Failure Stainless Steel Mesh High Temperature Exposure Flexure Strength 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is based upon work supported by the AFOSR under Contract No. FA9550-04-C-0038 (Previously F49620-02-C-0075).

References

  1. 1.
    Davidovits J (1991) J Thermal Anal 37:1633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lyon RE, Sorathia U, Balaguru PN, Foden A, Davidovits J, Davidovics M (1996) In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on fiber composites in infrastructure (ICCI’ 96), Tucson, Arizona, USA, p 972Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hammell JA (2000) The influence of matrix composition and reinforcement type on the properties of polysialate composites. Ph.D. thesis, Rutgers University, p 158Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hammell JA, Balaguru PN, Lyon RE (2000) Composites B Eng 31:107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lyon RE, Balaguru PN, Foden A, Sorathia U, Davidovits J, Davidovics M (1997) Fire Mater 21:67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lankard DR (1985) In: Mat Res Symp Proc, vol 42, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, p 277Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mobasher B, Shah SP (1992) Engineering Mechanics. In: Proceedings of the 9th conference, College Station, Texas, USA, p 868Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Giancaspro J, Balaguru P, Lyon R (2003) International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineering, ISOPEGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barbosa VFF, MacKenzie KJD (2003) Mater Lett 57:1477CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ceramatec Inc.Salt Lake CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringRutgers, The State University of New JerseyNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations