Determination of essential work of fracture in EPBC sheets obtained by different transformation processes
- 64 Downloads
1 mm sheets of polypropylene and ethylene-propylene block copolymers (EPBC) have been obtained using different processing methods in order to study the influence of processing induced morphology in the fracture properties of these materials. The processing methods employed were compression moulding (CM), extrusion-calendering (EC) and injection moulding (IM). Additionally, the sheets obtained by extrusion and injection were submitted to an annealing process with the aim to obtain more homogeneous morphologies that would ease their characterization.
The morphology has been characterized by different techniques: Polarizing light microscopy (MLP), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), wide-angle X-ray diffraction scattering (WAXS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
The fracture properties were determined by the essential work of fracture (EWF) method for deeply double edge notched specimens (DDENT), since these materials show ductile and post-yielding fracture behaviour. The EWF technique was applied in both the melt flow (MD) and the transversal (TD) directions in the sheets obtained by extrusion and injection moulding.
Results show that the sensitivity of the technique allows examining the effect of morphological variations of thin sheets, as well as a better characterization of the orientation level (versus other parameters like yielding stress or elastic modulus obtained by tensile test).
KeywordsDifferential Scanning Calorimetry Tensile Test Fracture Property Block Copolymer Thin Sheet
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.K. HIROFUMI, I. YOSHIMU, M. KAZUO, S. AKIRA and Y. SHIGEKI, European Patent 0376423 (1990).Google Scholar
- 2.W. HELLERICH, G. HARSCH and S. HAENLE, in “Guía de Materiales Plásticos,” 5th ed. (Hanser, Barcelona, 1989).Google Scholar
- 3.M. L. MASPOCH, J. GÁMEZ-PÉ REZ, E. GIMÉ NEZ, O. O. SANTANA and A. GORDILLO, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 93 (2004) 2866.Google Scholar
- 4.D. FERRER-BALAS, M. L. MASPOCH, A. B. MARTÍNEZ and O. O. SANTANA, Polymer 42 (2001) 1697.Google Scholar
- 5.D. FERRER-BALAS, M. L. MASPOCH, A. B. MARTÍNEZ, E. CHING, R. K. Y. LI and Y. W. MAI, Polymer 42(6) (2001) 2665.Google Scholar
- 6.D. FERRER-BALAS, in “Aplicación del método del Trabajo Esencial de Fractura para el estudio de films de polipropileno y copolímeros de polipropileno-polietileno en bloques,” PhD Thesis Work (Technological University of Catalonia, 2001) p. 79.Google Scholar
- 7.M. L. MASPOCH, J. GAMEZ-PEREZ, A. GORDILLO, M. SÁNCHEZ-SOTO and J. I. VELASCO, Polymer 43 (2002) 4177.Google Scholar
- 8.M. FUJIYAMA, in “Higher Order Structure of Injection-Moulded Polypropylene in “Polypropylene, Structure and Morphology” (Chapman & Hall, London, 1995) p. 2739.Google Scholar
- 9.B. COTTERELL and J. K. REDDEL, Int. J. Fract. 13 (1977) 267.Google Scholar
- 10.K. B. BROBERG, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 23 (1975) 215.Google Scholar
- 11.B. COTTERELL AND Y. W. MAI, Int. J. Fract. 32 (1986) 105.Google Scholar
- 12.E. CLUTTON, in “Essential Work of Fracture in Fracture Mechanics Testing Methods for Polymers, Adhesives and Composites,” edited by D. R. Moore, A. Pavan and J. G. Williams (Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, 2001) p. 177.Google Scholar
- 13.J. C. VIANA, A. M. CUNHA and N. BILLON, Polymer 43 (2002) 4185.Google Scholar
- 14.N. ALBEROLA, M. FUGIER, D. PETIT and B. FILLON, J. Mater. Sci. 30 (1995) 1187.Google Scholar
- 15.A. TURNER-JONES, J. M. AIZLEWOOD and D. R. BECKETT, Macromol. Chem. 75 (1964) 134.Google Scholar
- 16.A. KELLER and M. MACHIN, J. Macromol. Sci. B1 (1967) 41.Google Scholar
- 17.Z. TADMOR, J. App. Polym. Sci. 18 (1974) 1753.Google Scholar
- 18.M. L. MASPOCH, D. FERRER-BALAS, A. GORDILLO and O. O. SANTANA, ibid. 73 (1999) 177.Google Scholar