Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 40, Issue 13, pp 3453–3459 | Cite as

Influence of martensite volume fraction and tempering time on tensile properties of partially austenitized in the (α + γ) temperature range and quenched + tempered ferritic ductile iron

  • M. Cerah
  • K. Kocatepe
  • M. ErdoganEmail author
Article

Abstract

In the present study, the effect of martensite volume fraction and tempering time on the tensile properties of ferritic ductile iron with dual matrix structure was investigated. For this purpose, specimens were intercritically annealed (partially austenitized) in the two phase region (α + γ) at various temperatures of 795 and 815° C for 20 min and then quenched into oil held at 100° C to obtain different martensite volume fractions. Some specimens were also conventionally heat treated (austenitized at 900° C and then quenched + tempered) for a comparison reason. The results showed that a structure having proeutectoid ferrite plus martensite has been developed and volume fraction of proeutectoid ferrite and martensite can be controlled to influence the strength and ductility. Specimens quenched from the (α + γ) temperature range exhibited much greater ductility than conventionally heat treated specimens. The tensile strength increased and ductility decreased with increasing martensite content. By increasing the tempering time, the yield and UTS decreased and ductility increased. The specimens tempered for 3 h and having 62% martensite volume fraction (MVF) exhibited the best combination of high strength and ductility. The tensile and proof stress of this material is much higher than pearlitic grades and ductility is lower than ferritic grades. The specimen tempered for 3 h and having ∼ 25% MVF exhibited the best combination of high strength and ductility compared to ferritic grades. However its strength is slightly lower but the ductility is almost three times higher than pearlitic grades.

Keywords

Ferrite Martensite Ductility Tensile Property Good Combination 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. C. VOIGT, L. M. ELDOKY and H. S. CHIOU, AFS Trans. 94 (1986) 645.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. M. RASHIDI and M. MOSHREFI-TORBATI, Mat. Let. 45 (2000) 203.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Z. R. HE, G. X. LIN and S. JI, Mat. Charac. 38 (1997) 251.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. HAFIZ, Z. Metallkd. 11 (2001) 1258.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. ELLIOT, “Cast Iron Technology” (Butterworths 1988).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. KOBAYASHI and H. YAMAMOTO, Met. Mat. Trans. A. 19A (1988) 319.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. KOBAYASHI and S. YAMADA, Met. Mat. Trans. A. 27A (1996) 1961.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. ARANZABAL, G. SERRAMOGLIA and D. ROUSIERE, Int. J. Cast. Met. Res. 16 (2003) 185.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. KAZEROONI, A. NAZARBOLAND and R. ELLIOT, Mat. Sci. Tech. 13 (1997) 1007.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. W. ANDREWS, J. Iron Steel Inst. (1965) 203.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. ERDOGAN, J. Mat. Sci. 37 (2002) 3623.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. ERDOGAN and R. PRIESTNER, Mat. Sci. Tech. 15 (1999) 1273.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. G. DAVIES, Met. Mat. Trans. A. 9A (1978) 671.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. G. DAVIES, Met. Mat. Trans. A. 10A (1979) 1549.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. C. BAIN and H. W. PAXTON, “Alloying Elements in Steel,” 2nd edn. (ASM, 1939).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    K.-E. THELNING, “Steel and Its Heat Treatment”(Butterworths, 1975).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Metallurgy Education Department, Faculty of Technical EducationGazi UniversityBesevler-AnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations