Advertisement

On the Distribution of Photon Counts with Censoring in Two-Photon Laser Scanning Microscopy

  • Burcin Simsek
  • Satish Iyengar
Article

Abstract

We address the problem of counting emitted photons in two-photon laser scanning microscopy. Following a laser pulse, photons are emitted after exponentially distributed waiting times. Modeling the counting process is of interest because photon detectors have a dead period after a photon is detected that leads to an underestimate of the count of emitted photons. We describe a model which has a Poisson \((\alpha )\) number N of photons emitted, and a dead period \(\Delta \) that is standardized by the fluorescence time constant \(\tau (\delta = \Delta /\tau )\), and an observed count D. The estimate of \(\alpha \) determines the intensity of a single pixel in an image. We first derive the distribution of D and study its properties. We then use it to estimate \(\alpha \) and \(\delta \) simultaneously by maximum likelihood. We show that our results improve the signal-to-noise ratio, hence the quality of actual images.

Keywords

Counter Dead period Exponential waiting times Grouping Inhomogeneous Poisson process Loss of information Maximum likelihood 

Mathematics Subject Classification

60G55 60K40 62E15 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank David Kleinfeld for his guidance on the physics background, especially in contrasting our work with those of Isbaner and his colleagues. We thank David Kleinfeld and Philbert Tsai (UC San Diego) for generating the imaging data. We also thank the reviewers for their helpful comments. Dr. Simsek was supported by an Andrew Mellon Predoctoral Fellowship at the University of Pittsburgh.

References

  1. 1.
    Bentley, D.L.: A contribution to counter theory. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 25, 169–178 (1963)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cox, D.R., Hinkley, D.V.: Theoretical Statistics. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton (1979)MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daley, D.J., Vere-Jones, D.: An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes. Springer, Berlin (1988)MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Denk, W., Strickler, J.H., Webb, W.W.: Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. Science 248, 73–76 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Driscoll, J.D., Shih, A.Y., Iyengar, S., Field, J.J., White, G.A., Squier, J.A., Cauwenberghs, G., Kleinfeld, D.: Photon counting, censor corrections, and lifetime imaging for improved detection in two-photon microscopy. J. Neurophysiol. 105, 3106–3113 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feller, W.: On probability problems in the theory of counters. Courant Anniv Vol Intersci 8, 105–115 (1948)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Helmchen, F., Denk, W.: Deep tissue two-photon microscopy. Nat. Methods 2, 932–940 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Isbaner, S., Karedla, N., Ruhlandt, D., Stein, S.C., Chizhik, A., Gregor, I., Enderlein, J.: Dead-time correction of fluoresence lifetime measurements and fluoresence lifetime imaging. Opt. Express 24, 9429–9445 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kao, E.P.C., Marion, S.S.: On renewal processes relating to counter models: the case of phase-type interarrival times. J. Appl. Probab. 30, 175–183 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lakowicz, J.R.: Emerging applications of fluorescence spectroscopy to cellular imaging: lifetime imaging, metal-ligand probes, multi-photon excitation and light quenching. Scanning Microsc. Suppl. 10, 213–224 (1996)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McLachlan, G.J., Krishnan, T.: The EM Algorithm and Extensions. Wiley, Hoboken (1997)MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oheim, M., Michael, D.J., Geisbauer, M., Madsen, D., Chow, R.H.: Principles of two-photon excitation fluorescence microscopy and other nonlinear imaging approaches. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 58, 788–808 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pyke, R.: On renewal processes related to type I and type II counter models. Ann. Math. Stat. 29, 737–754 (1958)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Simsek B.: Applications of point process models to imaging and biology. PhD Dissertation, Statistics Department, University of Pittsburgh (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    So, P.T., Dong, C.Y., Masters, B.R., Berland, K.M.: Two-photon excitation fluorescence microscopy. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2, 399–429 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Svoboda, K., Yasuda, R.: Principles of two-photon excitation microscopy and its applications to neuroscience. Neuron 50, 823–839 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Takács, L.: On a probability problem arising in the theory of counters. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 52, 488–498 (1956)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tsai, P.S., Kleinfeld, D.: In vivo two-photon laser scanning microscopy with concurrent plasma-mediated ablation: principles and hardware realization. In: Frostig, R.D. (ed.) In Vivo Optical Imaging of Brain Function, 2nd edn, pp. 59–115. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yu, D.F., Fessler, J.A.: Mean and variance of single photon counting with dead time. Phys. Med. Biol. 45, 2043–2056 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of StatisticsUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations