Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision

, Volume 26, Issue 1–2, pp 85–103 | Cite as

Error Analysis for Image Inpainting



Image inpainting refers to restoring a damaged image with missing information. In recent years, there have been many developments on computational approaches to image inpainting problem [2, 4, 6, 9, 11–13, 27, 28]. While there are many effective algorithms available, there is still a lack of theoretical understanding on under what conditions these algorithms work well. In this paper, we take a step in this direction. We investigate an error bound for inpainting methods, by considering different image spaces such as smooth images, piecewise constant images and a particular kind of piecewise continuous images. Numerical results are presented to validate the theoretical error bounds.


inpainting total variation minimization error analysis inpainting domain image restoration 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    G. Aubert and P. Kornprobst, Mathematical Problems in image Processing: Partial Differential Equations and the Calculus of Variations, Vol. 147, of Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer-Verlag, New York Inc, 2002.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Ballester, M. Bertalmio, V. Caselles, G. Sapiro, and J. Vergera, “Filling-in by joint interpolation of vector fields and gray levels,” IEEE Trans. Image Processing, Vol. 10, No. 8, pp. 1200–1211, 2001.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Bertalmio, A. Bertozzi, and G. Sapiro, “Navier-Stokes, fluid dynamics, and image and video inpainting,” in Proc. IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition(CVPR), Hawaii, 2001.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Bertalmio, G. Sapiro, V. Caselles, and C. Balleste, “Image inpainting,” in Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2000, New Orleans, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Bertalmio, Luminita Vese, G. Sapiro, and S. Osher, “Simultaneous structure and texture image inpainting,” IEEE Trans. Image Processing, Vol. 12, No. 8, pp. 882–889, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. Caselles, J.M. Morel, and C. Sbert, “An axiomatic approach to image interpolation,” IEEE Trans. Image Processing, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 376–386, 1998.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. F. Chan and S. H. Kang, “Error analysis for image inpainting,” UCLA CAM 04-72, 2004.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T.F. Chan, S.H. Kang, and J. Shen, “Total variation denoising and enhancement of color images based on the CB and HSV color models,” Journal of Visual Comm. and Image Rep., Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 422–435, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    T.F. Chan, S.H. Kang, and J. Shen, “Euler’s elastica and curvature based inpainting,” SIAM Journal of Applied Math., Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 564–592, 2002.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T.F. Chan, S. Osher, and J, Shen, “The digital TV filter and nonlinear denoising,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 231–241, 2001.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    T.F. Chan and J. Shen, “Mathematical models for local deterministic inpaintings,” SIAM Journal of Applied Math., Vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 1019–1043, 2001.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    T.F. Chan and J. Shen, “Morphology invariant PDE inpaintings,” Technical report, UCLA Dept. of Math, CAM 01-15, 2001.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    T.F. Chan and J. Shen, “Non-Texture inpainting by curvature-driven diffusion (CDD),” Journal of Visual Comm. and Image Rep., Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 436–449, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    T.F. Chan and J. Shen, Image Processing and Analysis: Variational, PDE, wavelets, and stochastic methods. SIAM Publisher, Philadelphia, 2005.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    T.F. Chan, J. Shen, and H. M. Zhou, “Total variation wavelet inpainting,” UCLA CAM report, 04-47, 2004.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    T.F. Chan, L. Vese, and J. Shen, “Variational PDE models in image processing,” AMS Notice, Vol. 50, pp. 14–26, 2003.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    L. Evans, Partial Differential Equations, American Mathematical Society, 1998.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    L. Evans and R. Gariepy, Measure Theory and Fine Properties of Functions, Studies in Advanced Mathematics. CRC Press, Roca Baton, FL, 1992.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. Gilbarg and N.S. Trudinger, Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1977.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. Gonzalez and P. Woods, Digital Image Processing, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1992.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Y. Gousseau and J.-M. Morel, “Are natural images of bounded variation,” SIAM Journal of Mathematical Analysis, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 634–648, 2001.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Jain, Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing, Prentice Hall, 1989.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    F. John, Partial Differential Equations, Vol. 1, of Applied Mathematical Sciences Springer-Verlag, New York Inc, 1981.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    S.H. Kang, “Mathematical approaches to color denoising and image inpainting problems,” UCLA CAM 02–25, 2002.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    S.H. Kang, T.F. Chan, and S. Soatto, “Inpainting from multiple view,” IEEE Proceedings of First International Symposium on 3D Data Processing Visualization Transmission, pp. 622–625, 2002.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    S.H. Kang, T.F. Chan, and S. Soatto, “Landmark based inpainting from multiple view,” UCLA CAM, 02–11, 2002.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    S. Masnou, “Variational formulation of the disocclusion problem,” The Abdus Salam, Int’l Centre for Theoretical Physics, School on Mathematical Problems in Image Processing, 2000.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. Masnou and J.M. Morel, “Level lines based disocclusion,” in Proceedings of 5th IEEE Int’l Conf. on Image Process., Chicago, Vol. 3, pp. 259–263, 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUCLALos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations