Abstract
This paper examines and classifies the computational complexity of model checking and satisfiability for hybrid logics over frames with equivalence relations. The considered languages contain all possible combinations of the downarrow binder, the existential binder, the satisfaction operator, and the global modality, ranging from the minimal hybrid language to very expressive languages. For model checking, we separate polynomial-time solvable from PSPACE-complete cases, and for satisfiability, we exhibit cases complete for NP, PSpace, NExpTime, and even N2ExpTime. Our analysis includes the versions of all these languages without atomic propositions, and also complete frames.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Areces, C., Blackburn, P., & Marx, M. (1999). A road-map on complexity for hybrid logics. In Proceedings of the 13th CSL, 1999, volume 1683 of LNCS (pp. 307–321). Springer.
Areces C., Blackburn P., Marx M. (2000) The computational complexity of hybrid temporal logics. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 8(5): 653–679
Blackburn P., Seligman J. (1995) Hybrid languages. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 4: 251–272
Blackburn, P. & Seligman, J. (1998). What are hybrid languages? In M. Kracht, M. de Rijke, H. Wansing, & M. Zakharyaschev (Eds.), Advances in Modal Logic, volume 1 of CSLI Publications (pp. 41–62). Stanford University.
Chlebus B.S. (1986) Domino-tiling games. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 32(3): 374–392
Franceschet M, de Rijke M. (2005) Model checking for hybrid logics (with an application to semistructured data). Journal of Applied Logic, 4(3): 279–304
Franceschet, M., de Rijke, M., & Schlingloff, B.-H. (2003). Hybrid logics on linear structures: Expressivity and complexity. In Proceedings of the 10th TIME, 2003 (pp. 166–173). IEEE Computer Society.
Goranko V. (1996) Hierarchies of modal and temporal logics with reference pointers. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 5(1): 1–24
Ladner R.E. (1977) The computational complexity of provability in systems of modal propositional logic. SIAM Journal on Computing, 6(3): 467–480
Lange, M. (2005). A lower complexity bound for propositional dynamic logic with intersection (Vol. 5, pp. 133–147). King’s College Publications.
Mundhenk, M., Schneider, T., Schwentick, T., & Weber, V. (2005). Complexity of hybrid logics over transitive frames. In H. Schlingloff (Ed.), M4M, volume 194 of Informatik-Berichte (pp. 62–78). Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. The cited version is http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.4130v1atarXiv.or.
Papadimitriou, C. H. (1994). Computational complexity. Addison-Wesley.
SavelsberghM.vanEmde Boas P. (1984) Bounded tiling, an alternative to satisfiability. In: Wechsung G. (eds) 2nd Frege Conference, volume 20 of Mathematische Forschung.. Akademie Verlag, Berlin, pp 354–363
ten Cate, B., & Franceschet, M. (2005). On the complexity of hybrid logics with binders. In Proceedings of the 19th CSL, 2005, volume 3634 of LNCS (pp. 339–354). Springer.
Vardi, M., & Stockmeyer, L. (1985). Improved upper and lower bounds for modal logics of programs. In Proceedings of the 17th STOC (pp. 240–251).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mundhenk, M., Schneider, T. The Complexity of Hybrid Logics over Equivalence Relations. J of Log Lang and Inf 18, 493–514 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-009-9089-6
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-009-9089-6