Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems

, Volume 65, Issue 1–4, pp 603–620 | Cite as

Pressurized Structures–Based Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Research



Several areas of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) performance need to be improved for the next generation of UAVs to be used successfully in expanded future combat roles. This report describes the initial research to improve the performance of UAVs through the use of lighter-than-air or pressurized structures-based (PSB) technologies. Basically, we examined how to construct the UAV in such a way that a considerable percentage of its weight will be supported by or composed of inflatable structures containing air or helium. In this way, PSB technology will reduce the amount of energy required to keep the UAV aloft, thus allowing the use of smaller, slower, and quieter motors. Using PSB technology in tandem with improving technologies in electronics, energy storage, and materials should provide a substantial increase over current UAV performance in areas needed by the military.


Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) Lighter than air Pressurized structure Hybrid vehicle 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Cadogan, D., Graham, W., Smith, T.: Inflatable and rigidizable wings for unmanned aerial vehicles. AIAA Unmanned Unlimited Systems, pp. 2003–6630. San Diego, CA (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cadogan, D., Smith, T., Uhelsky, F., MacKusick, M.: Morphing inflatable wing development for compact package unmanned aerial vehicles. AIAA-2004-1807, 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. Palm Springs, CA, (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Edge, H., Collins, J., Brown, A., Coatney, M., Roget, B., Slegers, N., Johnson, A.: Lighter-than-air and pressurized structures technology for unmanned aerial vehicles. ARL-TR-5068; U.S. Army Research Laboratory: Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Black, D., Wainauski, H., Rohrbach, C.: Shrouded propellers—a comprehensive performance study. AIAA-68-994, AIAA 5th Annual Meeting and Technical Display. Philadelphia, PA, (1968)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roget, B.: Effect of diffuser design on ducted rotor hover performance. U.S. Army Research Laboratory External Communication with National Institute of Aeronautics, Langley, VA, (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Meyer, A.: X-plane manual. Accessed August 2007
  7. 7.
    Slegers, N., Kyle, J., Costello, M.: Nonlinear model predictive control technique for unmanned air vehicles. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 29(5), 1179–1188 (2006). ISSN: 0731-5090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tischler, M.B., Remple, R.K.: Aircraft and rotorcraft system identification: engineering methods with flight test examples. AIAA, Reston (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. (outside the USA) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research LaboratoryU.S. ArmyAberdeenUSA
  2. 2.Motile Robotics Inc.Aberdeen Proving GroundUSA

Personalised recommendations