Skip to main content
Log in

Operator Performance in Exploration Robotics

A Comparison Between Stationary and Mobile Operators

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mobile robots can accomplish high-risk tasks without exposing humans to danger: robots go where humans fear to tread. Until the time in which completely autonomous robots are fully deployed, remote operators will be required in order to fulfill desired missions. Remotely controlling a robot requires that the operator receives the information about the robot’s surroundings, as well as its location in the scenario. Based on a set of experiments conducted with users, we evaluate the performance of operators when they are provided with a hand-held-based interface or a desktop-based interface. Results show how performance depends on the task asked of the operator and the scenario in which the robot is moving. The conclusions prove that the operator’s intra-scenario mobility when carrying a hand-held device can counterbalance the limitations of the device. By contrast, the experiments show that if the operator cannot move inside of the scenario, his performance is significantly better when using a desktop-based interface. These results set the basis for a transfer of control policy in missions involving a team of operators, some equipped with hand-held devices and others working remotely with desktop-based computers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams, J.A.: Critical Considerations for Human-robot Interface Development. Technical report, 2002 AAAI Fall Symposium: Human Robot Interactiomn Technical Report (2002)

  2. Cohen, G.: Memory in the Real World. Erlbaum, Hove (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Driewer, F., Sauer, M., Schilling, K.: Design and evaluation of an user interface for the coordination of a group of mobile robots. In: 17th Iternational Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. RO-MAN 2008, pp. 237–242 (2008)

  4. Drury, J.L., Hestand, D., Yanco, H.A., Scholtz, J.: Design guidelines for improved human-robot interaction. In: Extended abstracts of the 2004 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 1540 (2004)

  5. Drury, J.L., Keyes, B., Yanco, H.A.: Lassoing hri: analyzing situation awareness in map-centric and video-centric interfaces. In: Proceedings of the Second ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 279–286 (2007)

  6. Drury, J.L., Yanco, H.A., Scholtz, J.C.: Beyond usability evaluation: analysis of human-robot interaction at a major robotics competition. Human-Comput. Interact. J. 19(1–2), 117–149 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fong, T., Thorpe, C., Glass, B.: Pdadriver: a handheld system for remote driving. In: IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics (2003)

  8. Fong, T., Thorpe, C.E., Baur, C.: Advanced interfaces for vehicle teleoperation: collaborative control, sensor fusion displays, and remote driving tools. Auton. Robots 11(1), 77–85 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Fong, T., Thorpe, C.E., Baur, C.: Robot, asker of questions. Robot. Auton. Syst. 42(3–4), 235–243 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Gerkey, B.P., Vaughan, R.T., Howard, A.: The player/stage project: tools for multi-robot and distributed sensor systems. In: 11th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR 2003), pp. 317–323. Portugal (2003)

  11. Hedström, A., Christensen, H.I., Lundberg, C.: A wearable gui for field robots. In: Field and Service Robotics, pp. 367–376 (2005)

  12. Herrmann, T.: Blickpunkte und Blickpunktsequenzen. In: Sprache & Kognition, vol. 15, pp. 217–233 (1996)

  13. Httenrauch, H., Norman, M.: Pocketcero—mobile interfaces for service robots. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices (2001)

  14. Humphrey, C.M., Henk, C., Sewell, G., Williams, B.W., Adams, J.A.: Assessing the scalability of a multiple robot interface. In: Proceedings of the Second ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI 2007, pp. 239–246. Arlington, Virginia, 10–12 March 2007

  15. Kaymaz-Keskinpala, H., Adams, J.A.: Objective data analysis for a pda-based human robotic interface. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man & Cybernetics, pp. 2809–2814 (2004)

  16. Kaymaz-Keskinpala, H., Kawamura, K., Adams, J.A.: Pda-based human-robotic interface. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man & Cybernetics, vol. 4, pp. 3931–3936 (2003)

  17. Nielsen, C.W., Goodrich, M.A.: Comparing the usefulness of video and map information in navigation tasks. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI 2006, pp. 95–101 (2006)

  18. Nielsen, C.W., Goodrich, M.A., Ricks, R.W.: Ecological interfaces for improving mobile robot teleoperation. IEEE T. Robotic. Autom. 23(5), 927–941 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Perzanowski, D., Schultz, A.C., Adams, W., Marsh, E., Bugajska, M.D.: Building a multimodal human-robot interface. IEEE Intell. Syst. 16(1), 16–21 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Scholtz, J., Young, J., Drury, J.L., Yanco, H.A.: Evaluation of human-robot interaction awareness in search and rescue. In: Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings ICRA’04, vol. 3, pp. 2327–2332. IEEE (2004)

  21. Skubic, M., Bailey, C., Chronis, G.: A sketch interface for mobile robots. In: Proc. IEEE 2003 Conf. on SMC, pp. 918–924 (2003)

  22. Valero, A., Mecella, M., Matia, F., Nardi, D.: Adaptative Human-Robot Interaction for Mobile Robots. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 17th Iternational Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. RO-MAN. Munchen (2008)

  23. Werner, S., Krieg-Brückner, B. Mallot, H.A., Schweizer, K., Freksa, C.: Spatial cognition: the role of landmark, route, and survey knowledge in human and robot navigation. In: GI Jahrestagung, pp. 41–50 (1997)

  24. Yanco, H.A., Drury, J.L.: “Where am i?” acquiring situation awareness using a remote robot platform. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man & Cybernetics, pp. 2835–2840. The Hague, Netherlands, 10–13 October 2004

  25. Yanco, H.A., Drury, J.L.: Rescuing interfaces: a multi-year study of human-robot interaction at the aaai robot rescue competition. Auton. Robots 22(4), 333–352 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yanco, H.A., Drury, J.L., Scholtz, J.: Awareness in human-robot interactions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Washington, DC (2003)

  27. Yanco, H.A., Keyes, B., Drury, J.L., Nielsen, C.W., Few, D.A., Bruemmer, D.J.: Evolving interface design for robot search tasks. J. F. Robot. 24(8–9), 779–799 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Valero.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Valero, A., Randelli, G., Botta, F. et al. Operator Performance in Exploration Robotics. J Intell Robot Syst 64, 365–385 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-011-9539-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-011-9539-7

Keywords

Navigation