Modelling and prediction of surface roughness in wire arc additive manufacturing using machine learning

Abstract

WAAM has been proven a promising alternative to fabricate medium and large scale metal parts with a high depositing rate and automation level. However, the production quality may deteriorate due to the poor deposited layer surface quality. In this paper, a laser sensor based surface roughness measuring method was developed for WAAM. To improve the surface integrity of deposited layers by WAAM, different machine learning models, including ANFIS, ELM and SVR, were developed to predict the surface roughness. Furthermore, the ANFIS model was optimized by GA and PSO algorithms. Full factorial experiments were conducted to obtain the training data, and the K-fold Cross-validation strategy was applied to train and validate machine learning models. The comparison results indicate that GA–ANFIS has superiority in predicting surface roughness. The RMSE, \( R^{2} \), MAE and MAPE for GA–ANFIS were 0.0694, 0.93516, 0.0574, 14.15% respectively. This study could also provide inspiration and guidance for surface roughness modelling in multipass arc welding and cladding.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Abbreviations

WAAM:

Wire arc additive manufacturing

ANFIS:

Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system

GA:

Genetic algorithm

PSO:

Particle swarm optimization

ELM:

Extreme learning machine

SVR:

Support vector regression

WFS:

Wire feed speed

RMSE:

Root mean square error

MAE:

Mean absolute error

MAPE:

Mean absolute percentage error

References

  1. Alarifi, I. M., Nguyen, H. M., Naderi Bakhtiyari, A., & Asadi, A. (2019). Feasibility of ANFIS-PSO and ANFIS-GA models in predicting thermophysical properties of Al2O3-MWCNT/oil hybrid nanofluid. Materials (Basel), 12(21), 3628. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12213628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aminzadeh, M., & Kurfess, T. R. (2019). Online quality inspection using Bayesian classification in powder-bed additive manufacturing from high-resolution visual camera images. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 30(6), 2505–2523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brandl, E., Michailov, V., Viehweger, B., & Leyens, C. (2011). Deposition of Ti–6Al–4 V using laser and wire, part I: Microstructural properties of single beads. Surface & Coatings Technology, 206(6), 1120–1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Charles, A., Elkaseer, A., Thijs, L., Hagenmeyer, V., & Scholz, S. (2019). Effect of process parameters on the generated surface roughness of down-facing surfaces in selective laser melting. Applied Sciences, 9(6), 1256. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9061256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deng, C., Huang, G., Xu, J., & Tang, J. (2015). Extreme learning machines: new trends and applications. Science China Information Sciences, 58(2), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ding, D., Pan, Z., Cuiuri, D., & Li, H. (2015a). A multi-bead overlapping model for robotic wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM). Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 31, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2014.08.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ding, D., Pan, Z., Cuiuri, D., & Li, H. (2015b). Wire-feed additive manufacturing of metal components: Technologies, developments and future interests. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 81(1–4), 465–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Frazier, W. E. (2014). Metal additive manufacturing: A review. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 23(6), 1917–1928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghasemi, E., Kalhori, H., & Bagherpour, R. (2016). A new hybrid ANFIS–PSO model for prediction of peak particle velocity due to bench blasting. Engineering with Computers, 32(4), 607–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-016-0438-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hosseinioun, N. (2016). Forecasting outlier occurrence in stock market time series based on wavelet transform and adaptive ELM algorithm. Journal of Mathematical Finance, 6(1), 127–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hu, Z., Qin, X., Li, Y., Yuan, J., & Wu, Q. (2020). Multi-bead overlapping model with varying cross-section profile for robotic GMAW-based additive manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 31(5), 1133–1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hussein, A. M. (2016). Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System of friction factor and heat transfer nanofluid turbulent flow in a heated tube. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 8, 94–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Karmuhilan, M. (2018). Intelligent process model for bead geometry prediction in WAAM. Materials Today: Proceedings, 5(11), 24005–24013.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Karunakaran, K., Suryakumar, S., Pushpa, V., & Akula, S. (2010). Low cost integration of additive and subtractive processes for hybrid layered manufacturing. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 26(5), 490–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Moayedi, H., Raftari, M., Sharifi, A., Jusoh, W. A. W., & Rashid, A. S. A. (2019). Optimization of ANFIS with GA and PSO estimating α ratio in driven piles. Engineering with Computers, 36(1), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-00694-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Najafi, G., Ghobadian, B., Moosavian, A., Yusaf, T., Mamat, R., Kettner, M., et al. (2016). SVM and ANFIS for prediction of performance and exhaust emissions of a SI engine with gasoline–ethanol blended fuels. Applied Thermal Engineering, 95, 186–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Raju, M., Gupta, M. K., Bhanot, N., & Sharma, V. S. (2019). A hybrid PSO–BFO evolutionary algorithm for optimization of fused deposition modelling process parameters. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 30(7), 2743–2758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Saeidian, B., Mesgari, M. S., & Ghodousi, M. (2016). Evaluation and comparison of genetic algorithm and bees algorithm for location–allocation of earthquake relief centers. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 15, 94–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Salcedo-Sanz, S., Casanova-Mateo, C., Pastor-Sánchez, A., & Sánchez-Girón, M. (2014). Daily global solar radiation prediction based on a hybrid coral reefs optimization-extreme learning machine approach. Solar Energy, 105, 91–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sarkheyli, A., Zain, A. M., & Sharif, S. (2015). A multi-performance prediction model based on ANFIS and new modified-GA for machining processes. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 26(4), 703–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shekarian, E., & Gholizadeh, A. A. (2013). Application of adaptive network based fuzzy inference system method in economic welfare. Knowledge-Based Systems, 39, 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Strano, G., Hao, L., Everson, R. M., & Evans, K. E. (2013). Surface roughness analysis, modelling and prediction in selective laser melting. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 213(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.11.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tabari, H., Kisi, O., Ezani, A., & Talaee, P. H. (2012). SVM, ANFIS, regression and climate based models for reference evapotranspiration modeling using limited climatic data in a semi-arid highland environment. Journal of Hydrology, 444, 78–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu, D., Wei, Y., & Terpenny, J. (2018). Predictive modelling of surface roughness in fused deposition modelling using data fusion. International Journal of Production Research, 57(12), 3992–4006. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1505058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xia, C., Pan, Z., Polden, J., Li, H., Xu, Y., Chen, S., et al. (2020). A review on wire arc additive manufacturing: Monitoring, control and a framework of automated system. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 57, 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xiong, J., Li, Y., Li, R., & Yin, Z. (2018a). Influences of process parameters on surface roughness of multi-layer single-pass thin-walled parts in GMAW-based additive manufacturing. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 252, 128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.09.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xiong, J., Li, Y.-J., Yin, Z.-Q., & Chen, H. (2018b). Determination of surface roughness in wire and arc additive manufacturing based on laser vision sensing. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 31(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-018-0276-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu, L., Huang, C., Li, C., Wang, J., Liu, H., & Wang, X. (2020). Estimation of tool wear and optimization of cutting parameters based on novel ANFIS-PSO method toward intelligent machining. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 1–14.

  29. Yarpiz Evolutionary ANFIS Training in MATLAB. https://yarpiz.com/319/ypfz104-evolutionary-anfis-training.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the China Scholarship Council for financial support (No. 201704910782) and UOW Welding and Industrial Automation Research Centre.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zengxi Pan or Yanling Xu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, C., Pan, Z., Polden, J. et al. Modelling and prediction of surface roughness in wire arc additive manufacturing using machine learning. J Intell Manuf (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01725-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Additive manufacturing
  • Surface roughness
  • Machine learning
  • ANFIS
  • GA
  • PSO