Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal tolerance design of hierarchical products based on quality loss function

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Taguchi’s loss function has been used for optimal tolerance design, but the traditional quadratic quality loss function is inappropriate in the tolerance design of hierarchical products, which are ubiquitous in industrial production. This study emphasizes hierarchical products and extends the traditional quality loss function on the basis of Taguchi’s quadratic loss function; the modified formulas are subsequently used to establish quality loss function models of the nominal-the-best, larger-the-better, and smaller-the-better characteristics of hierarchical products. An example is presented to demonstrate the application of the extended smaller-the-better characteristic loss function model to the optimal tolerance design of hierarchical products. Furthermore, the problem associated with selecting materials of various grades in the design process is discussed. The results show that the extended quality loss function model demonstrates good operability in the tolerance design of hierarchical products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chan, W. M., Ibrahim, R. N., & Lochert, P. B. (2005). Quality evaluation model using loss functionfor multiple S-type quality characteristics. The International Journal Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 26(1–2), 98–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. H., & Chou, C. Y. (2003). Determining the optimum manufacturing target based on an asymmetric quality loss function. The International Journal Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 21(3), 193–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, S. C., Nederbragt, W. W., Kaing, S., & Sriram, R. D. (1999). Incorporating process planning into conceptual design. In Proceedings of the 1999 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences (DETC99), vol.4—4th Design for Manufacturing Conference.

  • Jeang, A. (1998). Tolerance chart optimization for quality and cost. International Journal of Production Research, 36(11), 2969–2983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, Q., & Liu, S. G. (2013). Research of asymmetric quality loss function with triangular distribution. Advanced Materials Research, 655–657, 2331–2334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazovic, R., & Mijatovic, I. (2012). Modified quadratic loss function for a trivariate response with the exact feasible region for parameters. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 31(2), 177–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M. H. C. (2003). Quality loss functions for the measurement of service quality. The International Journal Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 21(1), 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M. H. C. (2005). A general model for process-setting with an asymmetrical linear loss function. The International Journal Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 26(11–12), 1317–1322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manarvi, I. A., & Juster, N. P. (2004). Framework of an integrated tolerance synthesis model and using FE simulation as a virtual tool for tolerance allocation in assembly design. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 150(1–2), 182–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, H., Jiang, X., Xu, Z., & Liu, X. (2008). Optimal tolerance design for products with correlated characteristics by considering the present worth of quality loss. The International Journal Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39(1–2), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podolak, I. T., & Roman, A. (2013). Theoretical foundations and experimental results for a hierarchical classifier with overlapping clusters. Computational Intelligence, 29(2), 357–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafiei, H., Rabbani, M., & Alimardani, M. (2013). Novel bi-level hierarchical production planning in hybrid MTS/MTO production contexts. International Journal of Production Research, 51(5), 1331–1346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robles, N., & Roy, U. (2004). Optimal tolerance allocation and process-sequence selection incorporating manufacturing capacities and quality issues. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 23(2), 127–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rout, B. K., & Mittal, R. K. (2006). Tolerance design of robot parameters using Taguchi method. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 20(8), 1832–1852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shina, S., Kongsuwon, P., & Chob, B. R. (2010). Development of the parametric tolerance modeling and optimization schemes and cost-effective solutions. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(3), 1728–1741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi, G., Chowdhury, S., & Wu, Y. (2005). Taguchi’s quality engineering handbook. Michigan: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F., Dantan, J. Y., Etienne, A., Siadat, A., & Martin, P. (2009). Improved algorithm for tolerance allocation based on Monte Carlo simulation and discrete optimization. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 56(4), 1402–1413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. C., & Naikan, V. N. A. (2003). Optimum tolerance design for complex assemblies using hierarchical interval constraint networks. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 45(3), 511–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yueyi Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Li, L., Song, M. et al. Optimal tolerance design of hierarchical products based on quality loss function. J Intell Manuf 30, 185–192 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1238-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1238-6

Keywords

Navigation