Intelligent information sharing among manufacturers in supply networks: supplier selection case
- 227 Downloads
Decision making in highly distributed supply networks has become more complex in globally dynamic markets. Despite extensive previous work on supply network decisions, it is still necessary to develop advanced tools for selective collection, management, and sharing of relevant information. In this research, a new intelligent, distributed, and autonomous information sharing protocol is modelled and applied to analytically determine supplier information sharing among manufacturers. Information sharing with all manufacturers is neither sensible nor realistic, since it requires high communication/implementation costs and cannot guarantee a positive return to all parties. Our Intelligent Supplier Information Sharing (ISIS) protocol supports each manufacturer’s decision-making process on selective information sharing. It does so by analyzing the expected sharing benefit while estimating the value of other parties’ information. Through a negotiation process, the appropriate price for shared information that each manufacturer has to pay is also determined. Numerical examples illustrate the performance of the ISIS protocol. Compared to no sharing and complete sharing of information, selective sharing recommended by ISIS yields relatively higher profits. For the case analyzed, profit increase by ISIS is, on average, 15.5 % higher than with complete information sharing, and this advantage holds even under changing conditions.
KeywordsCollaboration Decision protocol Distributed network Selective sharing Sustainable supply network
Support by the PRISM Center (Production, Robotics, and Integration Software for Manufacturing and Management) at Purdue University and by the Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Latin American Operations (LAO) is acknowledged. Also, this work was supported in part by the Hongik University new faculty research support fund.
- Barnett, M. W., & Miller, C. J. (2000). Analysis of the virtual enterprise using distributed supply chain modeling and simulation: An application of e-SCOR. Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings, 1, 352–355.Google Scholar
- Ertogral, K., & Wu, S. D. (2000). Auction-theoretic coordination of production planning in the supply chain. IIE Transactions, 32(10), 931–940.Google Scholar
- European Union (EU) competition rules. http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/competition/firms/l26062_en.htm.
- Harris, J. K., & Swatman, P. M. C. (1998). Efficient consumer response (ECR): A survey of the Australian grocery industry. Australian Journal of Information Systems, 5(2), 32–40.Google Scholar
- Jaber, M., Badr, Y., & Biennier, F. (2006). Distributed information system for the supply chain integration. International conference on information & communication technologies: From theory to applications (IEEE Cat. No. 06EX1220C), 6.Google Scholar
- Jeong, I.-J., & Leon, V. J. (2002). Decision-making and cooperative interaction via coupling agents in organizationally distributed systems. IIE Transactions, 34(9), 789–802.Google Scholar
- Jorgensen, C. R., Nelson, B., & Ratheal, S. (2014). Policy enabled information sharing system. U.S. Patent No. 8,825,611.Google Scholar
- Renewable Choice Energy. (2012a). Quick guide to understanding your Walmart sustainability index score. http://www.renewablechoice.com/assets/media/WalmartQuickGuide.pdf Accessed 31 May 2013.
- Renewable Choice Energy. (2012b). The growing trend of sustainability scorecards: Why it makes sense to get on board. White Paper.Google Scholar
- Semiconductor component manufacturers. http://ftp.itl.co.uk/HomePages/PAULREYNOLDS/semi.htm
- Seok, H., & Nof, S. Y. (2011a). Decision support protocol for sustainability issues in supply networks. Proceedings of the 2011 industrial engineering research conference, Reno.Google Scholar
- Seok, H., & Nof, S. Y. (2011b). The HUB-CI initiative for cultural, education and training, and healthcare networks. Proceedings of 21st international conference on production research, Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
- Song, L., & Nagi, R. (1997). Design and implementation of a virtual information system for agile manufacturing. IIE Transactions, 29(10), 839–857.Google Scholar
- Uppin, M. S., & Hebbal, S. S. (2010). Multi agent system model of supply chain for information sharing. Contemporary Engineering Sciences, 3(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
- Waller, M., Johnson, M. E., & Davis, T. (1999). Vendor-managed inventory in the retail supply chain. Journal of Business Logistics, 20(1), 183–203.Google Scholar
- Wylie, L. (1990). A vision of next generation MRP II. Gartner Group, Scenario S-300-339.Google Scholar
- Yingzhao, S., & Jing, L. (2009). Information sharing model of supply chain based on third party logistics providers. ISECS international colloquium on computing, communication, control, and management (CCCM) (pp. 139–143).Google Scholar