Advertisement

Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 535–548 | Cite as

A weighted-coupled network-based quality control method for improving key features in product manufacturing process

  • Guangzhou Diao
  • Liping Zhao
  • Yiyong Yao
Article

Abstract

There are some complicated coupling relations among quality features (QFs) in manufacturing process. Generally, the machining errors of one key feature may cause some errors of other features which are coupled with the key one. Considering the roles of key QFs, the weighted-coupled network-based quality control method for improving key features is proposed in this paper. Firstly, the W-CN model is established by defining the mapping rules of network elements (i.e. node, edge, weight). Secondly, some performance indices are introduced to evaluate the properties of W-CN. The influence index of node is calculated to identify the key nodes representing key features. Thirdly, three coupling modes of nodes are discussed and coupling degrees of key nodes are calculated to describe the coupling strengthen. Then, the decoupling method based on small world optimization algorithm is discussed to analyze the status changes of key nodes accurately. Finally, a case of engine cylinder body is presented to illustrate and verify the proposed method. The results show that the method is able to provide guidance for improving product quality in manufacturing process

Keywords

Weighted-coupled network Quality control Influence indices Coupling modes Key nodes Decoupling 

Notation

Symbols/parameters

\(\mathbf {Meaning}\)

\(f_{i}\)

\(i\)th quality feature of product

\(q- f_{i}\)

output quality of \(i\)th feature

\(F\)

set of quality feature \(f_{i}\)

\(n\)

total number of features

\(s_{i }\)

\(i\)th machining stage

\(S \)

set of machining stage \(s_{i}\)

\(m \)

total number of machining stages

\(l_{ij }\)

coupling relation between \(f_{i}\) and \(f_{j}\)

\(L \)

set of coupling relation

\(p_{i}\)

importance degree of \(f_{i}\)

\(P\)

set of importance degree

\(N_{i}\)

\(i\)th network node

\(N\)

node set

\(e_{ij}\)

network edge between \(N_{i}\) and \(N_{j}\)

\(E \)

edge set

\(w_{i}\)

\(i\)th node weight

\(W \)

weight set

\(D_{i}\)

degree of \(i\)th node

\(C_{i }\)

clustering coefficient of \(i\)th node

\(E_{i}\)

sensitivity degree of \(i\)th node

\(Q_{i}\)

influence index of \(i\)th node

\(\varphi \)

node strength coefficient

\(\rho \)

Weibull coefficient

\(c_{ij}\)

coupling degree of \(N_{i}\) and\( N_{j}\)

\(\alpha \)

number of produced new nodes

\(\beta \)

possible maximum edges

\(U\)

time dimension of node state

\(x_{t}\), \(y_{t}\)

element of node state at time \(t\)

\(\gamma \)

the resolution ratio

\(N_{key}\)

key node

\(c_{key}\)

coupling degree of key nodes

\(\lambda \)

number of nodes coupled with key nodes

\(X_{key}\)

state set of key nodes

\(X_{ckey}\)

coupling data set of key nodes

\(c_{ckey, j}\)

coupling degree between key node and \(j\)th node

\(b_{0}\),\(b_{1}\),\(b_{2}\),\(b_{3}\)

coefficient of status equation

\(B \)

initial solution

\(T \)

target solution

\(Q \)

number of total targets

\(u \)

start region

\(v \)

end region

\(\delta \)

objects in one search region

\(\sigma \)

region size

\(q\)

number of search regions

\(\sigma \)

search parameters

\(T_{l}\)

global random search steps

\(\psi \)

global search index

\(C_{\sigma }\)

global search constant

\(T_{s}\)

local walk search steps

\(r\)

neighbor points of \(B\)

\(\mu \)

local search coefficient

\(E\)

minimum accumulated error

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by grant no. 51275399 from the National Natural Science Foundation.

References

  1. Abellan-Nebot, J. V., Liu, J., Subirón, F. R., & Shi, J. J. (2012). State space modeling of variation propagation in multistation machining processes considering machining-induced variations. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering-Transactions of the ASME, 134(2), 021002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aoki, M., & Aovenner, A. (1991). State space model of multiple time series. Economic Reviews, 10(1), 1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barabasi, A. L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barhak, J., Djurdjanovic, D., Spicer, P., & Katz, R. (2005). Integration of reconfigurable inspection with stream of variations methodology. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 45(4–5), 407–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boccaletti, S., Latora, V., Moreno, Y., Chavez, M., & Hwang, D. U. (2006). Complex networks: Structure and dynamics. Physics Reports, 424(4–5), 175–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Capocci, A., Servedio, V. D. P., Caldarelli, G., & Colaiori, F. (2005). Detecting communities in large networks. Physical A, 352(2–4), 669–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, H., & Chu, X. N. (2012). A network-based assessment approach for change impacts on complex product. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(4), 1419–1431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Du, W., Mo, R., Li, S., & Li, B. (2012). Design of product key characteristics management system. Advanced Materials Research, 468–471, 835–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gade, P. M., & Hu, C. K. (2000). Synchronous chaos in coupled map lattices with small-world interactions. Physical Review E, 62(5), 6409–6413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ho, C. Y., & Lin, Z. C. (2003). Analysis and application of grey relation and ANOVA in chemical-mechanical polishing process parameters. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 21(1), 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hu, S. J. (1997). Stream of variation theory for automotive body assembly. Annals of the CIRP, 46(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hu, H. S., & Li, Z. W. (2009). Local and global deadlock prevention policies for resource allocation systems using partially generated reachability graphs. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 57(4), 1168–1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hu, H. S., & Li, Z. W. (2010). Synthesis of liveness enforcing supervisor for automated manufacturing systems using insufficiently marked siphons. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 21(4), 555–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hu, H. S., Zhou, M. C., & Li, Z. W. (2012). iveness and ratio-enforcing supervision of automated manufacturing systems using Petri nets. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans, 42(2), 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huang, Q., Shi, J., & Yuan, J. (2003). Part dimensional error and its propagation modeling in multi-operational machining processes. ASME Transactions, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 125(2), 255–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jiao, Y., & Djurdjanovic, D. (2011). Compensability of errors in product quality in multistage manufacturing processes. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 30(4), 204–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jin, M., Li, Y. T., & Tsung, F. (2010). Chart allocation strategy for serial-parallel multistage manufacturing processes. IIE Transactions, 42(8), 577–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kam, J. M., Zeng, L., Zhou, Q., Tran, R., & Yang, J. (2013). On assessing spatial uniformity of particle distributions in quality control of manufacturing processes. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 32(1), 154–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Keinberg, J. (2000). Navigation in a small world. Nature, 406(6798), 845–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim, H. K., Kim, J. K., & Chen, Q. Y. (2012). A product network analysis for extending the market basket analysis. Expert System and Application, 39(8), 7403–7410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Köksoy, O. (2011). A nonlinear programming solution to robust multi-response quality problem. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 196(2), 603–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li, J. M., Freheit, T., Hu, S. J., & Koren, Y. (2007). A quality prediction framework for multistage machining process driven by an engineering model and variation propagation model. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering-Transactions of the ASME, 129(6), 1088–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li, M., Liu, F., & Ren, F. Y. (2007). Routing strategy on a two-dimensional small-world network model. Physical Review E, 75(6), 066115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu, D. Y., & Jiang, P. Y. (2009). The complexity analysis of a machining error propagation network and its application. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacturing, 223(6), 623–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu, F. Y., & Qi, G. N. (2008). Research on component relation network of product family and its application. International Journal of Materials and Product Technology, 31(2–4), 186–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lv, Y., Lee, K. M., & Wu, Z. (2011). Fuzzy theory applied in quality management of distributed manufacturing system: A literature review and classification. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 24(2), 266–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mao, W. T., Yan, G. R., Dong, L. L., & Hu, D. K. (2011). Model selection for least squares support vector regressions based on small-world strategy. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3227–3237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marsh, R., Jonik, M., Lanham, J., et al. (2010). Modelling an assembly process using a close coupled generative cost model and a discrete event simulation. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 23(3), 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moreno, Y., Gómez, J. B., & Pacheco, A. F. (2001). Instablity of scal-free networks under node-breaking avalanches. Europhysics Letters, 58(4), 630–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Newman, M. E. J. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45(2), 167–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Newman, M. E. J., Moore, C., & Watts, D. J. (2000). Mean-field solution of the small-world network model. Physical Review Letters, 84(14), 3201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pacella, M., Semeraro, Q., & Anglani, A. (2004). Manufacturing quality control by means of a fuzzy ART network trained on natural process data. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 17(1), 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Qin, Y. T., Zhao, L. P., & Yao, Y. Y. (2011a). Multistage machining processes variation propagation analysis based on machining processes weighted network performance. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 55(5–8), 487–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Qin, Y. T., Zhao, L. P., & Yao, Y. Y. (2011b). Dynamic quality characteristics modeling based on brittleness theory in complex manufacturing processes. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 24(20), 915–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Quintana, G., Garcia-Romeu, M. L., & Ciurana, J. (2011). Surface roughness monitoring application based on artificial neural networks for ball-end milling operations. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 22(4), 607–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosyidi, C. N., Irianto, D., & Toha, I. S. (2009). Prioritizing key characteristics. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, 8(1), 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sanjay, G., & Prabhat, H. (1996). Identification of parameter coupling in turbine design using neural networks. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 12(3), 503–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shukla, N., Ceglarek, D., & Tiwari, M. K. (2013). Key characteristics-based sensor distribution in multi-station assembly processes. Journal of intelligent manufacturing. doi: 10.1007/s10845-013-0759-5.
  39. Wang, N., Xu, J., & Yang, J. (2012). Method of identifying key quality characteristics in multistage manufacturing process based on PLSR. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 217–219, 2580–2584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang, X. H., Yang, X. Y., & Su, T. T. (2006). Global numerical optimization based on small-world networks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4222, 194–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Waxman, B. M. (1988). Routing of multipoint connections. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, 6(9), 1617–1622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wolbrecht, E., Ambrosio, B. D., Paasch, B., & Kirby, D. (2000). Monitoring and diagnosis of a multi-stage manufacturing process using Bayesian networks. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 14(1), 53–67.Google Scholar
  44. Yang, Z. M., Djurdjanovic, D., & Ni, J. (2008). Maintenance scheduling in manufacturing systems based on predicted machine degradation. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 19(1), 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yu, K. T., Shen, S. H., & Chen, K. S. (2007). The evaluation of process capability for a machining center. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 33(5–6), 505–510. Google Scholar
  46. Zhang, F. F., Liu, J., & Zuo, C. L. (2012). Research of complex network dynamics evolution. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 154, 806–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems EngineeringXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of Mechanical EngineeringXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations