Advertisement

Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 521–538 | Cite as

Real-time quality monitoring and predicting model based on error propagation networks for multistage machining processes

  • Pingyu Jiang
  • Feng Jia
  • Yan Wang
  • Mei Zheng
Article

Abstract

To ensure the machining processes stability of multistage machining processes (MMPs) and improve the quality of machining processes, a real-time quality monitoring and predicting model based on error propagation networks for MMPs is proposed in this paper. As there are some complicated interactions among different stages in MMPs, a machining error propagation network (MEPN) is proposed and its complexity is discussed to analyze the correlation among different stages in MMPs. Based on these, a real-time quality-monitoring model based on process variation trajectory chart is proposed to monitor the key machining stages extracted by MEPN. Due to the complexity of the correlation in MEPN, it is important and necessary to explore the variation propagation mechanism in MEPN. As for this issue, a machining error propagation model of machining form feature nodes in MEPN is established with the neuron model, which is solved with back-propagation neural network. The mapping relationship among machining errors of quality attributes is described through this node model. Furthermore, a novel equipment synthetic failure probability exponent of machining status nodes in MEPN is established to synthesize equipment’s parameters by using logistic regression to quantitatively analyze the potential-failure and forecast the equipment degradation trend. At last, the machining process of a connecting rod is used to verify the proposed method.

Keywords

Multistage machining processes Machining error propagation network Process variation trajectory chart Artificial neural network Equipment service performance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akaike H. (1969) Fitting autoregressive models for prediction. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 21(1): 243–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barabasi A. L., Albert R. (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286: 509–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barhak J., Djurdjanovic D., Spicer P., Katz R. (2005) Integration of reconfigurable inspection with stream of variations methodology. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 45: 407–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen W. C., Tseng S. S., Wang C. Y. (2005) A novel manufacturing defect detection method using association rule mining techniques. Expert Systems with Applications 29(4): 807–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ding F., He Z., Zi Y., Chen X., Cao H., Tan J. (2009) Reliability assessment based on equipment condition vibration feature using proportional hazards model. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering 45(12): 89–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ertugrul I., Aytaç E. (2009) Construction of quality control charts by using probability and fuzzy approaches and an application in a textile company. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 20: 139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feng J., Jiang P. Y. (2009) Method of change management based on dynamic machining error propagation. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences 52(7): 1811–1820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guo Y., Dooley K. J. (1992) Identification of change structure in statistical process control. International Journal of Production Research 30(7): 1655–1669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hosmer D. W., Lemeshow S. (1989) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  10. Hu S. J. (1997) Stream of variation theory for automotive body assembly. Annals of CIRP 46(1): 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huang Q., Shi J., Yuan J. (2003) Part dimensional error ant its propagation modeling in multi-operational machining processes. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 125(2): 255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jiang P., Liu D., Zeng Z. (2009) Recognizing control chart patterns with neural network and numerical fitting. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 20: 625–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jin M., Li Y. T., Tsung F. (2010) Chart allocation strategy for serial-parallel multistage manufacturing processes. IIE Transactions 42(8): 577–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu D., Jiang P. (2009) The complexity analysis of a machining error propagation network and its application. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 223: 623–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Luxhoj J. T., Shyur H.-J. (1997) Comparison of proportional hazards models and neural networks for reliability estimation. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 8(3): 227–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Montgomery D. C. (1996) Introduction to statistical quality control (3rd ed.). Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Quintana G., Garcia-Romeu M. L., Ciurana J. (2011) Surface roughness monitoring application based on artificial neural networks for ball-end milling operations. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 22: 607–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Samrout M., Châtelet E., Kouta R., Chebbo N. (2009) Optimization of maintenance policy using proportional hazard model. Maintenance Modeling and Application 94(1): 44–52Google Scholar
  19. Tian Z. (2012) An artificial neural network method for remaining useful life prediction of equipment subject to condition monitoring. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 32(2): 227–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Väyrynen, J., Mattila, J., Vilenius, M., Ali, M., Valkama, P., Siuko M., & Semeraro, L. (2011). Predicting the runtime reliability of ITER remote handling maintenance equipment. In Proceedings of the 26th symposium of fusion technology (SOFT-26), Vol. 86, no. 9–11, pp. 2012–2015.Google Scholar
  21. Wade M. R., Woodall W. H (1993) A review and analysis of cause-selecting control charts. Journal of Quality Technology 25(3): 161–169Google Scholar
  22. Watts D. J., Strogatz S. H (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393: 440–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wolbrecht E., Ambrosio B.D., Paasch B., Kirby D. (2000) Monitoring and diagnosis of a multi-stage manufacturing process using Bayesian networks. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering, Design and Manufacturing 14(2): 53–67Google Scholar
  24. Yang S.-F. (2009) Process control using VSI cause selecting control charts. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 21: 853–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yang Z. M., Djurdjanovic D., Ni J. (2008) Maintenance scheduling in manufacturing systems based on predicted machine degradation. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 19(1): 87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhang, G. X. New type of quality control charts – cause-selecting control charts and a theory of diagnosis with control charts. In Proceedings of the World Quality Congress ’84, Brighton, England 1984, 175-185.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems EngineeringXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations