Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 1095–1109 | Cite as

Multi-objective optimization of facility planning for energy intensive companies



Because of the energy shortage and energy price rise, energy efficiency becomes a worldwide hot spot problem. It is not only a problem about cost reduction, but also a great contribute to the environmental protection. However, the energy efficiency was always ignored in the past decades. In order to gain more benefit and become more competitive in the market, energy efficiency should be considered as an essential factor in early planning phase. To overcome these problems, a new approach, which introduces energy efficiency as a key criterion into the planning process, is presented in this article. An energy recovery network is built according to the analysis of process and product demands. Afterwards the energy loss of the whole system, transport performance and space demand are simultaneously taken into account with the purpose of finding good facility planning from both energy and economic aspects. Finally, a practical expanding case is used to validate the correctness and effectiveness of the proposed approach.


Energy efficiency Facility planning Multi objective optimization Local search 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abyaneh, S. H., Zandieh, M. (2011) Bi-objective hybrid flow shop scheduling with sequence-dependent setup times and limited buffers. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. doi: 10.1007/s0017001133685.
  2. Agarwal A., Guptam S. K. (2008) Multiobjective optimal design of heat exchanger nerworks using new adaptations of the elitist nondominated sorting genetic algorithm, NSGA- II. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 47(10): 3489–3501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmad Z., Rahmani K., Souza R. M. D. (2010) Applications of genetic algorithms in process planning: tool sequence selection for 2.5-axis pocket machining. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 21: 461–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aiello G., Enea M., Galante G. (2006) A multi-objective approach to facility layout problem by genetic search algorithm and Electre method. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 22: 447–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balakrishnan J., Cheng C. H. (2007) Multi-period planning and uncertainty issues in cellular manufacturing: A review and future directions. European Journal of Operational Research 177: 281–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandyopadhyay, S.,& Bhattacharya, R. (2011). Applying modified NSGA-II for bi-objective supply chain problem. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi: 10.1007/s1084501106172.
  7. Berrichi A., Amodeo L., Yalaoui F., Châtelet E., Mezghiche M. (2009) Bi-objective optimization algorithms for joint production and maintenance scheduling: application to the parallel machine problem. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 20: 389–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cai, M., & Kagawa, T. (2001). Design and application of air power meter in compressed air systems. In Second international symposium on environmentally conscious design and inverse manufacturing (pp. 208–212). 2001 Japan, Dec 11–15.Google Scholar
  9. Cheng F. Q., Ye F. F., Yang J. G. (2009) Multi-objective optimization of collaborative manufacturing chain with time-sequence constraints. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 40: 1024–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheshmehgaz, H. R., Desa, M. I., & Wibowo, A. (2011). A flexible three-level logistic network design considering cost and time criteria with a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi: 10.1007/s1084501105847.
  11. Deb K., Pratap A., Agarwal S., Meyarivan T. (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6: 182–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dolan W. B., Cummings P. T., LeVan M. D. (1990) Process optimization via simulated annealing for heat exchanger network design. Computer and Chemical Engineering 14: 1039–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duzanec, D., & Kovacic, Z. (2009). Performance analysis-based GA parameter selection and increase of μGA accuracy by gradual contraction of solution space. In IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology. Gippsland, Australia, February 10–13. doi: 10.1109/ICIT.2009.4939483.
  14. Dwijayanti, K.,& Dawal, S. Z. (2010). A Proposed study on facility planning and design in manufacturing process. In Proceeding of the international multiconference of engineers and computer scientists 2010 (pp. 1640–1645). Hong Kong, March 17–19.Google Scholar
  15. Energy agent NRW. (2011). Energiekosten und leckagen: Das Druckluftnetz- ein Energiefresser im Betrieb. Accessed 25 July 2011.
  16. Frausto-Hernández S., Rico-Ramírez V., Jimérrez A., Jimérrez A. (2003) MINLP synthesis of heat exchanger networks considering pressure drop effects. Computers & Chemical Engineering 27: 1143–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geldermann J., Treitz M., Rentz O. (2006) Integrated technique assessment based on the pinch analysis approach for the design of production networks. European Journal of Operational Research 171(3): 1020–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Geldermann J., Treitz M., Schollenberger H., Ludwig J., Rentz O. (2007) Integrated process design for the inter-company plant layout planning of dynamic mass flow networks. Universitätsverlag Karlsruhe, KalrsruheGoogle Scholar
  19. Government of Alberta Energy. (2011). Alberta gas reference price History. Accessed 21 July 2011.
  20. Heragu S. S., Kusiak A. (1991) Efficient models for the facility layout problem. European Journal of Operational Research 53: 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ishibuchi H., Murata T. (1998) A multi-objective genetic local search algorithm and its application to flowshop scheduling. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part C: Applications and Reviews 28: 392–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ishibuchi, H., & Narukawa, K. (2004). Performance evaluation of simple multiobjective genetic local search algorithms on multiobjective 0/1 knapsack problems. In IEEE Congress on evolutionary computation (pp. 441–448). Portland, USA, June 19–23.Google Scholar
  23. Kannan S., Baskar S., McCalley J. D., Murugan P. (2009) Application of NSGA-II algorithm to generation expansion planning. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 24: 454–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kemp I. C. (2007) Pinch analysis and process integration: A user guide on process integration for the efficient use of energy. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. Krenn, C., Fresner, J., & Meixner, E. (2008). Energieeffizienzsteigerung in Unternehmen der stahlverarbeitenden Industrie durch Abwärmenutzung im Niedertemperaturbereich. In: The 10. Symposium Energieinnovation. Austria: Graz.Google Scholar
  26. Moya J. A., Pardo N., Mercier A. (2011) The potential for improvements in energy efficiency and co 2 emissions in the EU27 cement industry and the relationship with the capital budgeting decision criteria. Journal of Cleaner Production 19: 1207–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Müller E., Engelmann J., Löffler T. H., Strauch J. (2009) Energieeffiziente Fabriken planen und betreiben. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ponce-Ortega J. M., Serna- González M., Jiménez-Gutiérrez A. (2007) Heat exchanger network synthesis including detailed heat exchanger design using genetic algorithms. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 46: 8767–8780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Siriwardene N.R., Perera B.J.C. (2006) Selection of genetic algorithm operators for urban drainage model parameter optimization. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 44: 415–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Syarif A., Gen M. (2003) Solving exclusionary side constrained transportation problem by using a hybrid spanning tree-based genetic algorithm. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 14: 389–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Van Veldhuizen, D. A., & Lamont, G. B. (1998). Evolutionary computation and convergence to a pareto front. In Proceedings of the 1998 Genetic Programming Conference (pp. 221–228). CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
  32. Wang D. Y., Wang L. Y. (2005) The application of genetic algorithms in facility layout. Computer Engineering and Applications 14: 190–192Google Scholar
  33. Wu, G. Z., Li, D. Y., Qi, H. B., & Li, D. (2010). Analysis on thermal calculation model and influencing factors of steam pipeline. In 2010 International conference on intelligent system design and engineering application (pp. 314–317). Chang Sha, China.Google Scholar
  34. Yalcinoz, T., Altun, H., & Uzam, M. (2001) Economic dispatch solution using a genetic algorithm based on arithmetic crossover. In 2001 IEEE porto power tech conference. doi: 10.1109/PTC.2001.964734.
  35. Yee T. F., Grossmann I. E. (1990) Simultaneous optimization models for heat integration-II. Heat exchanger network synthesis. Computers and Chemical Engineering 14: 1165–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ying S. L., Pu Z. Y., Jie W. Y. (2006) Analysis and improve on system lose to process of compressed air transport. Coal Mine Machinery 27: 163–165Google Scholar
  37. Zhao X. C., Gao X. S., Hu Z. C. (2007) Evolutionary programming based on non-uniform mutation. Applied Mathematics and Computation 192(1): 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair of Industrial EngineeringTU Dortmund UniversityDortmundGermany
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems EngineeringXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations