Analysis of medications change in Parkinson’s disease progression data
- 232 Downloads
Parkinson’s disease is a neurodegenerative disorder that affects people worldwide. Careful management of patient’s condition is crucial to ensure the patient’s independence and quality of life. This is achieved by personalized treatment based on individual patient’s symptoms and medical history. The aim of this study is to determine patient groups with similar disease progression patterns coupled with patterns of medications change that lead to the improvement or decline of patients’ quality of life symptoms. To this end, this paper proposes a new methodology for clustering of short time series of patients’ symptoms and prescribed medications data, and time sequence data analysis using skip-grams to monitor disease progression. The results demonstrate that motor and autonomic symptoms are the most informative for evaluating the quality of life of Parkinson’s disease patients. We show that Parkinson’s disease patients can be divided into clusters ordered in accordance with the severity of their symptoms. By following the evolution of symptoms for each patient separately, we were able to determine patterns of medications change which can lead to the improvement or worsening of the patients’ quality of life.
KeywordsParkinson’s disease Quality of life indicators Clustering Short time series Skip-grams
This work was supported by the PD_manager and HBP SGA1 projects, funded within the EU Framework Program for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020 grants 643706 and 720270, respectively. We acknowledge also the support of the Slovenian Research Agency (research core funding P2-0103 and P2-0209).
Data used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) (http://www.ppmi-info.org/data). For up-to-date information on the study, visit http://www.ppmi-info.org. PPMI—a public-private partnership—is funded by the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research and funding partners. Corporate Funding Partners: AbbVie, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Biogen, BioLegend, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GE Healthcare, GLAXOSMITHKLINE (GSK), Eli Lilly and Company, Lundbeck, Merck, Meso Scale Discovery (MSD), Pfizer Inc, Piramal Imaging, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Servier, Takeda, Teva, UCB. Philanthropic Funding Partners: Golub Capital. List of funding partners can be also found at http://www.ppmi-info.org/fundingpartners.
- Agrawal, R., Imieliński, T., & Swami, A. (1993). Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In ACM sigmod record (Vol. 22, pp. 207–216). ACM.Google Scholar
- Appice, A. (2017). Towards mining the organizational structure of a dynamic event scenario. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 1–29.Google Scholar
- Blum, A., & Mitchell, T. (1998). Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. In Proceedings of the eleventh annual conference on computational learning theory, ACM, New York, NY, USA, COLT’ (Vol. 98, pp. 92–100).Google Scholar
- Cai, X., Nie, F., & Huang, H. (2013). Multi-view k-means clustering on big data. In Proceedings of the 23rd international joint conference on artificial intelligence IJCAI 2013, Beijing, China, August 3-9, 2013 (pp. 2598–2604).Google Scholar
- Chaudhuri, K., Kakade, S.M., Livescu, K., & Sridharan, K. (2009). Multi-view clustering via canonical correlation analysis. In Proceedings of the 26th annual international conference on machine learning, ICML 2009 (pp. 129–136).Google Scholar
- Choi, E., Schuetz, A., Stewart, W.F., & Sun, J. (2017). Using recurrent neural network models for early detection of heart failure onset. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 24(2), 361–370.Google Scholar
- Cleuziou, G., Exbrayat, M., Martin, L., & Sublemontier, J. (2009). CoFKM: a centralized method for multiple-view clustering. In Proceedings of the ninth IEEE international conference on data mining (ICDM 2009), miami, florida, USA, 6-9 December 2009 (pp. 752–757).Google Scholar
- De Alba, E., Mendoza, M., et al. (2007). Bayesian forecasting methods for short time series. The International Journal of Applied Forecasting, 8, 41–44.Google Scholar
- De Vine, L., Zuccon, G., Koopman, B., Sitbon, L., & Bruza, P. (2014). Medical semantic similarity with a neural language model. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM international conference on conference on information and knowledge management (pp. 1819–1822). ACM.Google Scholar
- Dorsey, E., Constantinescu, R., Thompson, J., Biglan, K., Holloway, R., Kieburtz, K., Marshall, F., Ravina, B., Schifitto, G., Siderowf, A., & et al. (2007). Projected number of people with Parkinson disease in the most populous nations, 2005 through 2030. Neurology, 68(5), 384–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ester, M., Kriegel, H.P., Sander, J., Xu, X., & et al. (1996). A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In KDD (Vol. 96, pp. 226–231).Google Scholar
- European Parkinson’s Disease Association. (2016). http://www.epda.eu.com/, accessed: 2016/07/01.
- Gatsios, D., Rigas, G., Miljkovic, D., Seljak, B.K., & Bohanec, M. (2016). m-health platform for Parkinson’s disease management. In Proceedings of 18th international conference on biomedicine and health informatics CBHI.Google Scholar
- Gil, D., & Johnson, M. (2009). Diagnosing Parkinson by using artificial neural networks and support vector machines. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 9(4), 63–71.Google Scholar
- Goetz, C.G., Tilley, B.C., Shaftman, S.R., Stebbins, G.T., Fahn, S., Martinez-Martin, P., Poewe, W., Sampaio, C., Stern, M.B., Dodel, R., & et al. (2008). Movement Disorder Society-sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Movement Disorders, 23(15), 2129–2170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Greene, D., Doyle, D., & Cunningham, P. (2010). Tracking the evolution of communities in dynamic social networks. In Advances in social networks analysis and mining (ASONAM), 2010 (pp. 176–183). IEEE.Google Scholar
- Guthrie, D., Allison, B., Liu, W., Guthrie, L., & Wilks, Y. (2006). A closer look at skip-gram modelling. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC-2006) (pp. 1–4).Google Scholar
- He, X., Kan, M.Y., Xie, P., & Chen, X. (2014). Comment-based multi-view clustering of Web 2.0 items. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 771–782): ACM.Google Scholar
- Imhoff, M., Bauer, M., Gather, U., & Löhlein, D. (1998). Time series analysis in intensive care medicine. Tech. rep. SFB 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in Multivariaten Datenstrukturen, Universität Dortmund.Google Scholar
- Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. (1987). Clustering by means of medoids. North-Holland.Google Scholar
- Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P.J. (1990). Finding groups in data. an introduction to cluster analysis. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics Applied Probability and Statistics.Google Scholar
- Kumar, A., & III, H.D. (2011). A co-training approach for multi-view spectral clustering. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on machine learning, ICML (pp. 393–400).Google Scholar
- Li, J., Cheng, K., Wang, S., Morstatter, F., Trevino, R.P., Tang, J., & Liu, H. (2016). Feature selection: a data perspective. arXiv:160107996.
- Liu, Y., Li, Z., Xiong, H., Gao, X., & Wu, J. (2010). Understanding of internal clustering validation measures. In Proceedings of IEEE 10th international conference on data mining (ICDM) (pp. 911–916).Google Scholar
- Liu, Y., Li, W., Tan, C., Liu, X., Wang, X., Gui, Y., Qin, L., Deng, F., Hu, C., & Chen, L. (2014). Meta-analysis comparing deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus and subthalamic nucleus to treat advanced Parkinson disease: a review. Journal of Neurosurgery, 121(3), 709–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013). Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv:http://arxiv.org/abs13013781.
- Minarro-Giménez, J.A., Marín-alonso, O., & Samwald, M. (2013). Exploring the application of deep learning techniques on medical text corpora. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 205, 584–588.Google Scholar
- National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions. (2006). Parkinson’s disease: national clinical guideline for diagnosis and management in primary and secondary care. London: Royal College of Physicians.Google Scholar
- Patel, S., Lorincz, K., Hughes, R., Huggins, N., Growdon, J., Standaert, D., Akay, M., Dy, J., Welsh, M., & Bonato, P. (2009). Monitoring motor fluctuations in patients with Parkinson’s disease using wearable sensors. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 13(6), 864–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- PD_manager: m-Health platform for Parkinson’s disease management. (2015). EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020, Grant number 643706, 2015–2017. http://www.parkinson-manager.eu/.
- Ramani, R.G., & Sivagami, G. (2011). Parkinson disease classification using data mining algorithms. International Journal of Computer Applications, 32(9), 17–22.Google Scholar
- Samà, A., Pérez-López, C., Rodríguez-martín, D., Moreno-aróstegui, J.M., Rovira, J., Ahlrichs, C., Castro, R., Graċa, R., Guimarães, V., & et al. (2015). A double closed loop to enhance the quality of life of Parkinson’s disease patients: REMPARK system. Innovation in Medicine and Healthcare, 2014(207), 115.Google Scholar
- SENSE-PARK. (2016). Project’s website: http://www.sense-park.eu/, accessed: 2016/07/01.
- Stecher, J., Janssen, F., & Fürnkranz, J. (2014). Separating rule refinement and rule selection heuristics in inductive rule learning. In Proceedings of machine learning and knowledge discovery in databases - European conference, ECML PKDD 2014 (pp. 114–129).Google Scholar
- Tzallas, A.T., Tsipouras, M.G., Rigas, G., Tsalikakis, D.G., Karvounis, E.C., Chondrogiorgi, M., Psomadellis, F., Cancela, J., Pastorino, M., Waldmeyer, M.T.A., & et al. (2014). PERFORM: a system for monitoring, assessment and management of patients with Parkinson’s disease. Sensors, 14(11), 21,329– 21,357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tzortzis, G., & Likas, A. (2009). Convex mixture models for multi-view clustering. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference artificial neural networks - ICANN (Vol. 2009, pp. 205–214).Google Scholar
- Valmarska, A., Robnik-Šikonja, M., & Lavrač, N. (2015). Inverted heuristics in subgroup discovery. In Proceedings of the 18th international multiconference information society.Google Scholar
- Valmarska, A., Miljkovic, D., Lavrač, N., & Robnik-Šikonja, M. (2016). Towards multi-view approach to Parkinson’s disease quality of life data analysis. In Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on new frontiers in mining complex patterns at ECML-PKDD2016.Google Scholar
- Xu, C., Tao, D., & Xu, C. (2013). A survey on multi-view learning. Neural Computing and Applications, 23(7–8), 2031–2038.Google Scholar
- Zhao, Z., & Liu, H. (2007). Spectral feature selection for supervised and unsupervised learning. In Proceedings of the 24th international conference on machine learning (pp. 1151–1157). ACM.Google Scholar