Advertisement

Journal of International Entrepreneurship

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 135–155 | Cite as

Organisational capabilities and internationalisation of the small and medium-sized information and communications technology firms

  • Olli Kuivalainen
  • Kaisu Puumalainen
  • Sanna Sintonen
  • Kalevi Kyläheiko
Article

Abstract

Especially in changing and unpredictable global environments where small knowledge-intensive information and communications technology (ICT) firms often operate, knowledge-based organisational capabilities are seen to contribute most to the performance. In this paper we explore the internationalisation process of small knowledge-intensive firms by studying the effects of a firm’s organisational capabilities on internationalisation and performance. We use a sample of 124 (of which 55 operate internationally) Finnish small and medium-sized firms. International experience is confirmed to be a significant determinant of internationalisation and international performance. In addition, financial capabilities prove to be a significant indicator of the degree of internationalisation: excellent investment expertise, connections with venture capitalists and good financial management are important capabilities for a small firm with high international growth aspirations.

Keywords

Organisational capabilities Internationalisation SMEs ICT Performance Knowledge-based view 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The Academy of Finland (Research programme Liike2) has supported this study.

References

  1. Adenfelt M, Lagerström K (2006) Organizational rejuvenation for knowledge exploitation: Exploring corporate entrepreneurship in an MNE. Journal of International Entrepreneurship 4:83–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amit R, Schoemaker PJ (1993) Strategic assets and organisational rent. Strateg Manage J 14(1):33–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen O, Kheam LS (1998) Resource-based theory and international growth strategies: an exploratory study. Int Bus Rev 7:163–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating non-response in mailed surveys. J Mark Res 14:396–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Augier M, Teece DJ (2007) Dynamic capabilities and multinational enterprise: Penrosian insights and omissions. Manag Int Rev 47:175–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Autio E, Sapienza HJ, Almeida JG (2000) Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Acad Manage J 43:909–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barney J (1986) Types of competition and the theory of strategy: toward an integrative framework. Acad Manag Rev 11:791–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manage 17:99–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bell J (1995) The internationalization of small computer software firms—a further challenge to “stage” theories. Eur J Mark 29:60–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bilkey WJ, Tesar G (1977) The export behavior of smaller sized Wisconsin manufacturing firms. J Int Bus Stud 8:93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blomqvist K, Kyläheiko K, Virolainen V-M (2002) Filling the gap in traditional transaction cost economics: towards transaction benefits-based analysis using Finnish telecommunications as an illustration. Int J Prod Econ 79:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brettel M, Engelen A, Heinemann F (2009) New entrepreneurial ventures in a globalized world: the role of market orientation. J Int Entrep 7:88–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brush CG, Vanderwerf PA (1992) A comparison of methods and sources for obtaining estimates of new venture performance. J Bus Venturing 7:157–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buckley PJ (2009) Internalisation thinking: from the multinational enterprise to the global factory. Int Bus Rev 18:224–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cadogan JW, Kuivalainen O, Sundvist S (2009) Export market-oriented behavior and export performance: quadratic and moderating effects under differing degrees of market dynamism and internationalization. J Int Mark 17(4):71–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cavusgil ST, Zou S (1994) Marketing strategy–performance relationship: an investigation of the empirical link in export market ventures. J Mark 58:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Manag Sci 35:1504–1511Google Scholar
  18. Coviello NE, McAuley A (1999) Internationalisation and the smaller firm: a review of contemporary empirical research. Manag Int Rev 39:223–256Google Scholar
  19. Coviello NE, Cox MP (2006) The resource dynamics of international new venture networks. Int J Entrep 4:113–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crick D, Jones M (2000) Small high-technology firms and international high-technology markets. J Int Mark 8(2):63–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eisenhardt K, Schoonhoven C (1990) Organizational growth: linking founding team strategy, environment and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures 1978–1988. Adm Sci Q 35:504–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eriksson K, Majkgård A, Sharma DD (2000) Path dependence and knowledge development in the internationalization process. Manag Int Rev 40:307–328Google Scholar
  23. Erramilli MK (1991) The experience factor in foreign market entry behavior of service firms. J Int Bus Stud 22:479–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fahy J (2002) A resource-based analysis of sustainable competitive advantage in a global environment. Int Bus Rev 11:57–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fernhaber SA, McDougall-Covin PP (2009) Venture capitalists as catalysts to new venture internationalization: the impact of their knowledge and reputation resources. Entrep Theory Pract 33:277–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Filatotchev I, Liu X, Buck T, Wright M (2009) The export orientation and export performance of high-technology SMEs in emerging markets: the effects of knowledge transfer by returnee entrepreneurs. J Int Bus Stud 40:1005–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gabrielsson M, Pelkonen T (2008) Born internationals: market expansion and business operation mode strategies in the digital media field. J Int Entrep 6:49–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gencturk E, Childers TL, Ruekert RW (1995) International marketing involvement: the construct, dimensionality, and measurement. J Int Mark 3:11–37Google Scholar
  29. Grant R (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg Manage J 17:109–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hair JF Jr, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  31. Jantunen A, Puumalainen K, Saarenketo S, Kyläheiko K (2005) Entrepreneurial orientation, dynamic capabilities and international performance. J Int Entrep 3:223–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johanson J, Vahlne J-E (1977) The internationalization process of the firm: a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. J Int Bus Stud 8:23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johanson J, Vahlne J-E (1990) The mechanism of internationalization. Int Mark Rev 7(4):11–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jones MV (1998) A preliminary analysis of the patterns, processes and decisions that constitute the internationalization of small UK high technology firms. Strathclyde International Business Unit, Working Paper Series, University of Strathclyde, 98/7Google Scholar
  35. Jones MV, Coviello NE (2005) Internationalisation: conceptualising an entrepreneurial process of behaviour in time. J Int Bus Stud 36:284–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Katsikeas CS, Leonidou LC, Morgan NA (2000) Firm-level export performance assessment: review, evaluation and development. J Acad Mark Sci 28:493–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Knight G (2001) Entrepreneurship and strategy in the international SME. J Internat Manag 7:155–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Knight GA, Cavusgil ST (1996) The born global firm: a challenge to traditional internationalisation theory. Adv Int Mar 8:11–26Google Scholar
  39. Knight GA, Cavusgil ST (2004) Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. J Int Bus Stud 35:124–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Knudsen T, Madsen TK (2002) Export strategy: a dynamic capabilities perspective. Scand J Manag 18:475–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kogut B, Zander U (1993) Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. J Int Bus Stud 24:625–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kuivalainen O, Sundqvist S, Puumalainen K, Cadogan JW (2004) Effect of environmental turbulence and leader characteristics on international performance: are knowledge-based firms different? Can J Adm Sci 21:35–50Google Scholar
  43. Kyläheiko K (1998) Making sense of technology: towards synthesis between neoclassical and evolutionary approaches. Int J Prod Econ 56–57:319–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lee C, Lee K, Pennings JM (2001) ´Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology-based ventures. Strateg Manage J 22:615–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Leonidou LC, Katsikeas CS, Samiee S (2002) Marketing strategy determinants of export performance: a meta-analysis. J Bus Res 55:51–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liesch P, Knight G (1999) Information internationalization and hurdle rates in small and medium enterprise internationalization. J Int Bus Stud 30:383–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lockett A, Wright M, Burrows A, Scholes L, Paton D (2008) The export intensity of venture capital backed companies. Small Bus Econ 31:39–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lu JW, Beamish PW (2001) The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strateg Manage J 22:565–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McDougall PP, Oviatt BM (1996) New venture internationalization, strategic change, and performance: a follow-up study. J Bus Venturing 11(1):23–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McDougall PP, Shane S, Oviatt B (1994) Explaining the formation of international new ventures: the limits of theories from international business research. J Bus Venturing 9:469–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McEvily SK, Chakravarthy B (2002) The persistence of knowledge-based advantage: an empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge. Strateg Manage J 23:285–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McGrath ME (1994) Product strategy for high-technology companies. Irwin, Burr RidgeGoogle Scholar
  53. McGrath RG, MacMillan IC, Venkataraman S (1995) Defining and developing competence: a strategic process paradigm. Strateg Manage J 16:251–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McNaughton RB (1996) Foreign market channel integration decisions of Canadian computer software firms. Int Bus Rev 5:23–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McNaughton RB (2003) The number of export markets that a firm serves: process models versus the born-global phenomenon. J Int Entrep 1:297–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Moen O, Servais P (2002) Born global or gradual global? Examining the export behaviour of small and medium-sized enterprises. J Int Mark 10:49–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard U.P., CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  58. Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci 5:14–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Oviatt BM, McDougall PP (1995) Global start-ups: entrepreneurs on a worldwide stage. Acad Manage Exec 9:30–43Google Scholar
  60. Oviatt BM, McDougall PP (1997) Challenges for internationalization process theory: the case of international new ventures. Manag Int Rev 37:85–99Google Scholar
  61. Peng M (2001) The resource-based view and international business. J Manage 27:803–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Penrose E (1959) The theory of the growth of the firm. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. Prashantham S (2005) Toward a knowledge-based conceptualization of internationalization. J Int Entrep 3:37–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Preece SB, Miles G, Baetz MC (1999) Explaining the international intensity and global diversity of early-stage technology-based firms. J Bus Venturing 14:259–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rennie MW (1993) Global competitiveness: born global. McKinsey Q 4:45–52Google Scholar
  66. Ripollés-Meliá M, Menguzzato-Boulard M, Sánchez-Peinado L (2007) Entrepreneurial orientation and international commitment. J Int Entrep 5:65–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ritter T (1999) The networking company antecedents for coping with relationships and networks effectively. Ind Mark Manage 28:467–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ritter T, Gemünden HG (2004) The impact of a company’s business strategy on its technological competence, network competence and innovation success. J Bus Res 57:548–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rumelt R (1984) Toward a strategic theory of the firm. In: Lamb R (ed) Competitive strategic management. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  70. Saarenketo S, Puumalainen K, Kuivalainen O, Kyläheiko K (2004) On dynamic knowledge-related learning processes in internationalizing high-tech SME’s. Int J Prod Econ 89:363–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Saarenketo S, Puumalainen K, Kyläheiko K, Kuivalainen O (2008) Linking knowledge and internationalization in ICT SME’s. Technovation 28:591–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Saarenketo S, Puumalainen K, Kuivalainen O, Kyläheiko K (2009) A knowledge-based view of growth in new ventures. Eur Bus Rev 21:531–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sapienza HJ, Autio E, George G, Zahra SA (2006) A capabilities perspective on the effects of early internationalization on firm survival and growth. Acad Manag Rev 30:914–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Spanos YE, Lioukas S (2001) An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: contrasting Porter’s competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective. Strateg Manage J 22:907–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Spender J-C, Grant RM (1996) Knowledge and the firm: overview. Strateg Manage J 17:5–9Google Scholar
  76. Sullivan D (1994) Measuring the degree of internationalization of a firm. J Int Bus Stud 25:325–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tallman S, Li J (1996) Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms. Acad Manage J 39:179–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Teece DJ (1998) Capturing value from knowledge assets: the new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. Calif Manage Rev 40:55–79Google Scholar
  79. Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg Manage J 28:1319–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Teece D, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manage J 18:509–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Welch LS, Luostarinen R (1988) Internationalization: evolution of a concept. J Gen Manage 14:36–64Google Scholar
  82. Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manage J 5:171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Westhead P, Wright M, Ucbasaran D (2001) The internationalisation of new and small firms: a resource-based view. J Bus Venturing 16:333–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wilkins J, van Wegen B, de Hoog R (1997) Understanding and valuing knowledge assets: overview and method. Expert Systems Appl 13:55–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wolff JA, Pett TL (2000) Internationalization of small firms: an examination of export competitive patterns, firm size, and export performance. J Small Bus Manage April:34–47Google Scholar
  86. Wright M, Westhead P, Ucbasaran D (2007) The internationalization of SMEs and international entrepreneurship: a critique and policy implications. Reg Stud 41:1013–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wright M, Buck T, Liu X, Filatotchev I (2008) Returnee entrepreneur characteristics, science park location choice and performance: an analysis of high technology SMEs in China. Entrep Theory Pract 32:131–155Google Scholar
  88. Zahra SA (1996) Technology strategy and performance: a study of corporate-sponsored and independent biotechnology ventures. J Bus Venturing 11:289–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zahra SA, Bogner WC (1999) Technology strategy and software new ventures’ performance: exploring the moderating effect of the competitive environment. J BusVenturing 15:135–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zahra SA, George G (2002) International entrepreneurship: the current status of the field and future research agenda. In: Hitt M, Ireland D, Sexton D, Camp M (eds) Entrepreneurship: creating an integrated mindset. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 255–288Google Scholar
  91. Zahra SA, Ireland RD, Hitt MA (2000) International expansion by new venture firms: international diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Acad Manage J 43:925–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olli Kuivalainen
    • 1
  • Kaisu Puumalainen
    • 1
  • Sanna Sintonen
    • 1
  • Kalevi Kyläheiko
    • 1
  1. 1.School of BusinessLappeenranta University of TechnologyLappeenrantaFinland

Personalised recommendations