Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 23–38 | Cite as

Managing the Dilemma of Discretion: The European Commission and the Development of EU State Aid Policy

  • Thomas J. Doleys


This article examines the role played by the European Commission in the development of the European Union’s (EU) state aid policy. It does so through the prism of a “dilemma” that exists at the nexus of the Commission’s delegated authority to administer EU treaty state aid provisions, the discretion conferred on Commission authorities by the imprecise language in which those provisions are written, and the political and institutional control mechanisms EU member governments use to influence the exercise of that discretion. Examining Commission efforts to manage this dilemma over the history of the EU, we provide evidence to illustrate how the Commission’s approach adapted to shifting economic and political conditions.


European Commission state aid competition policy incomplete contracts delegation 

JEL classification

D86 N44 O25 


  1. Andriessen F (1983) The role of anti-trust in the face of economic recession: state aids in the EEC. Eur Comp Law Rev 4:286–296Google Scholar
  2. Blauberger (2009) Of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ subsidies: European state aid control through soft and hard law. W Eur Pol 32(4):719–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caspari M (1988) The aid rules of the EEC Treaty and their application. In: Schwarze J (ed) Discretionary powers of the Member States in the field of economic policies and the limits under the EEC Treaty. Baden-Baden, Nomos, pp 37–52Google Scholar
  4. Cini M (2001) The soft law approach: commission rule-making in the EU’s state aid regime. J Eur Public Policy 8(2):192–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Commission of the European Community (CEC) (1960) Second general report on the activities of the European Economic Community. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  6. CEC (1969) Second general report on the activities of the European Communities. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  7. CEC (1972) First report on competition policy. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  8. CEC (1976) Fifth report on competition policy. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  9. CEC (1977) Sixth report on competition policy. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  10. CEC (1980) Ninth report on competition policy. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  11. CEC (1982) Eleventh report on competition policy. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  12. CEC (1988) First survey on state aids in the European Community. SEC(88)1981Google Scholar
  13. CEC (2005) State aid action plan—Less and better targeted state aid: a roadmap for state aid reform 2005–2009. COM(2005) 107 finalGoogle Scholar
  14. CEC (2008) State aid scoreboard: autumn update. COM(2008) 751 finalGoogle Scholar
  15. CEC (2009) Report on competition policy. COM(2009) 374 finalGoogle Scholar
  16. CEC (2011) State aid scoreboard: report on state aid granted by the EU member states. COM(2011) 848 of 1.12.2011Google Scholar
  17. Cownie F (1986) State aids in the eighties. Eur L Rev 11(4):247–267, London, Sweet & MaxwellGoogle Scholar
  18. de Jong HW (1982) Reflections on the economic crisis: markets, competition and welfare. In: O’Keefe D, Shermers HG (eds) Essays in European law and integration. Kluwer Law and Taxation, DeventerGoogle Scholar
  19. Della Cananea G (1993) Administration by guidelines: the policy guidelines of the Commission in the field of state aids. In: Hardin I (ed) State aid: community law and policyGoogle Scholar
  20. Doleys T (2000) Member states and the European Commission: insights from the new economics of organization. J Eur Public Policy 7(4):532–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. D’Sa R (2009) ‘Instant’ state aid law in a financial crisis—a U-turn? Eur State Aid L R 2:139–144Google Scholar
  22. Ehlermann CD (1992) The contribution of EC competition policy to the single market. CMLR 29:257–282Google Scholar
  23. Ehlermann CD (1994) State aids under European Community competition law. Fordham Int Law J 18(2):410–436Google Scholar
  24. Fisher R (1981) Improving compliance with international law. University of Virginia Press, CharlottesvilleGoogle Scholar
  25. Hancher L, Slot PJ, Ottervanger T (2006) EC state aids, 3rd edn. Sweet and Maxwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Jenny F (2006) The state aid action plan: a bold move or a timid step in the right direction? Compet Pol Int 2(2):79–91Google Scholar
  27. Kleiner T (2006) State aid reform. In: Sanchez Rydelski MS (ed) The EC state aid regime: distortive effects of state aid on competition and trade. Cameron May, London, pp 827–848Google Scholar
  28. Lavdas K, Mendrinou M (1999) Politics, subsidies and competition: the new politics of state intervention in the European Union. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  29. Majone G (1996) Regulating Europe. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maskin E (2002) On indescribable contingencies and incomplete contracts. Eur Econ Rev 46(4–5):725–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCubbins M, Noll R, Weingast B (1987) Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. J Law Econ Organ 3(2):243–277Google Scholar
  32. MacNeil I (1974) The many futures of contracts. South Calif Law Rev 47:691–816Google Scholar
  33. Milgrom P, North D, Weingast B (1990) The role of institutions in the revival of trade: the law merchant, private judges, and the champagne fairs. Econ Polit 2(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moe T (1984) The new economics of organization. Am J Pol Sci 28:739–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moe T (1990a) Political institutions: the neglected side of the story. J Law Econ Organ 6:213–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moe T (1990b) The politics of structural choice: toward a theory of public bureaucracy, In: Williamson O (ed) Organization theory: from Chester Barnard to the present and beyond. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Mortelmans K (1984) The compensatory justification criterion in the practice of the commission in decisions on state aid. C M L Rev 21Google Scholar
  38. Nicolaides P, Kekelekis M, Kleis M (2008) State aid policy in the European Community: principles and practice, 2nd edn. Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den RijnGoogle Scholar
  39. North D (1990) Institutions, institutional chance and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pollack M (2003) The engines of European integration: delegation, agency, and agenda-setting in the EU. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Rawlinson F (1993) The role of policy frameworks, codes and guidelines in the control of state aid. In: Hardin I (ed) State aid: community law and policyGoogle Scholar
  42. Schina D (1987) State aids under the EEC Treaty articles 92 to 94. ESC Publishing Limited, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  43. Schrans G (1973) National and regional aid to industry under the EEC treaty. Common Market Law Review 10Google Scholar
  44. Smith M (1996) Integration in small steps: the European Commission and member state aid to industry. W Eur Polit 19(3):563–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith M (1998) Autonomy by the rules: the European Commission and the development of state aid policy. J Common Mark Stud 36(1):55–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Von der Groeben H (1985) The European Community: the formative years. Commission of the European Communities, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilks A (1993) The metamorphosis of European competition policy. In: Snyder F (ed) European community law: volume I. New York University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Williamson O (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Zahariadis N (2010) State aid and partisan government in the European Union. Soc Sci Q 91(2):436–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science & International AffairsKennesaw State UniversityKennesawUSA

Personalised recommendations