Advertisement

Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 1063–1073 | Cite as

Fire increases ant-tending and survival of the Fender’s blue butterfly larvae

  • Norah Warchola
  • Carole Bastianelli
  • Cheryl B. Schultz
  • Elizabeth E. Crone
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

Studies of fire as a management tool often focus on how fire alters microclimate and affects plant quality. While these processes are important, they may act on a target species indirectly through species interactions. Fender’s blue [Plebejus (=Icaricia) icarioides fenderi] is an endangered butterfly found in fire dependent upland prairies in Oregon’s Willamette Valley, USA. In this study, we measured oviposition preference and overwinter larval survival and how they responded to an experimental burn. To explore the mechanism underlying differences in these vital rates, we studied gross plant chemistry of Fender’s blue larval host plants Kinkaid’s lupine (Lupinus oreganus = L. sulphureus spp. kincaidii) and spur lupine (L. arbustus) and monitored how temperature and fire history affect the mutualism between Fender’s blue larvae and a variety of tending ants. We used open top chambers to expand the range of observable temperatures, overlaid with the experimental burn to determine how both factors affected ant recruitment and duration of tending bouts. Oviposition rates and overwinter larval survival were higher in previously burned areas. We found no corresponding change in plant chemistry. Ant tending was affected by both temperature and fire history, with larvae able to recruit ants more quickly in warmer temperatures and fire history influencing the length of tending bouts. Differences in ant tending may explain enhanced overwinter survival. This case study highlights the importance of indirect (through species interactions) as well as direct effects in determining the impacts of fire on population dynamics of an at-risk butterfly species.

Keywords

Lycaenid Species interactions Prairie restoration Controlled burns Mutualism 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge funding from the Department of Defense’s SERDP program, as well as logistical support from the USFWS Willamette Valley National Wildlife Refuge complex including Jock Beall, Jeremy DePiero, Jarod Jebousek, Molly Monroe, and Sharon Selvagio. Thanks to staff at Harvard Forest, especially Manisha Patel for help with chemical analyses. We would like to thank the staff at Antweb for ant identifications. In addition, we thank the following for assistance in the field, Keala Cumming, Joey Smokey, Chris Hatten as well as many volunteers and students from WSU Vancouver.

Funding

This research was primarily funded by the DoD’s SERDP program, Project RC-2119 with supplemental funding from Tufts University, Harvard Forest and Washington State University.

Compliance with ethical standards

The authors declare that they have complied with ethical standards.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10841_2015_9822_MOESM1_ESM.doc (34 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 33 kb)

References

  1. Andersen AN (1991) Responses of ground-foraging ant communities to three experimental fire regimes in a savanna forest of tropical Australia. Biotropica 23:575–585. doi: 10.2307/2388395 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen AN, Yen AL (1985) Immediate effects of fire on ants in the semi-arid mallee region of north-western Victoria. Aust J Ecol 10:25–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.1985.tb00860.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen AN, Hertog T, Woinarski JCZ (2006) Long-term fire exclusion and ant community structure in an Australian tropical savanna: congruence with vegetation succession. J Biogeogr 33:823–832. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01463.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnan X, Rodrigo A, Retana J (2006) Post-fire recovery of Mediterranean ground ant communities follows vegetation and dryness gradients. J Biogeogr 33:1246–1258. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01506.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Axen AKH (2000) Variation in behavior of lycaenid larvae when attended by different ant species. Evol Ecol 14:611–625. doi: 10.1023/A:1010975422243 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ballmer GR, Pratt GF (1988) A survey of the last instar larvae of the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera) of California. J Res Lepid 27:1–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolker BM (2008) Ecological models and data in R. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  9. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen SR, Stevens MH, White JS (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24:127–135. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bura VL, Hnain AK, Hick JN, Yack JE (2012) Defensive sound production in the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta (Bombycoidea: Sphingidae). J Insect Behav 25:114–126. doi: 10.1007/s10905-011-9282-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Callaham MA Jr, Blair JM, Todd TC, Kitchen DJ, Whiles MR (2003) Macroinvertebrates in North American tallgrass prairie soils: effects of fire, mowing, and fertilization on density and biomass. Soil Biol Biochem 35:1079–1093. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00153-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Campbell JW, Hanula JL, Waldrop TA (2007) Effects of prescribed fire and fire surrogates on floral visiting insects of the blue ridge province in North Carolina. Biol Conserv 134:393–404. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.08.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cook D, Lee ST, Gardner DR, Pfister JA, Welch KD, Green BT, Davis TZ, Panter KE (2009) The alkaloid profiles of Lupinus sulphureus. J Agric Food Chem 57:1646–1653. doi: 10.1021/jf803468q CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Del-Claro K, Marquis RJ (2015) Ant species identity has a greater effect than fire on the outcome of an ant protection system in Brazilian cerrado. Biotropica 47:459–467. doi: 10.1111/btp.12227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Devries PJ, Harvey DJ, Kitching IJ (1986) The ant associated organs on the larva of the lycaenid butterfly Curetis regula Evans. J Nat Hist 20:621–633. doi: 10.1080/00222938600770421 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eastwood R, Fraser A (1999) Associations between lycaenid butterflies and ants in Australia. Aust J Ecol 24:503–537. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-169x.1999.01000.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farji-Brener AG, Corley JC, Bettinelli J (2002) The effects of fire on ant communities in North-Western Patagonia: the importance of habitat structure and regional context. Divers Distrib 8:235–243. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-4642.2002.00133.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fielder K (2006) Ant-associates of Palaearctic lycaenid butterfly larvae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae; Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)—a review. Myrmecol Nachr 9:77–87Google Scholar
  19. Fox J, Weisberg S (2011) An {R} companion to applied regression, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks. http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion
  20. Glasier JRN, Nielsen SE, Acorn JH (2015) The real “fire ants”: colony size and body size of workers influence the fate of boreal sand hill ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) after wildfires in Alberta, Canada. Can Entomol 147:396–404. doi: 10.4039/tce.2014.54 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Henning SF (1983) Biological groups within the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera). J Entomol Soc South Afr 46:65–85Google Scholar
  22. Hoffmann BD (2003) Responses of ant communities to experimental fire regimes on rangelands in the Victoria River District of the Northern Territory. Austral Ecol 28:182–195. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01267.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hollister RD, Webber PJ (2000) Biotic validation of small open-top chambers in a tundra ecosystem. Glob Change Biol 6:835–842. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00363.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hosoishi S, Tasen W, Park SH, Le Ngoc A, Kuboki Y, Ogata K (2015) Annual fire resilience of ground-dwelling ant communities in Hiraodai Karst Plateau grassland in Japan. Entomol Sci 18:254–261. doi: 10.1111/ens.12117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huntzinger M (2003) Effects of fire management practices on butterfly diversity in the forested western United States. Biol Conserv 113:1–12. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00356-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Izhaki I, Levey DS, Silva WS (2003) Effects of prescribed fire on an ant community in Florida pine savanna. Ecol Entomol 28:439–448. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2311.2003.00528.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jacobs KA, Nix B, Scharenbroch BC (2015) The effects of prescribed burning on soil and litter invertebrate diversity and abundance in an Illinois oak woodland. Nat Areas J 35:318–327. doi: 10.3375/043.035.0214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kay AD, Schade JD, Ogdahl M, Wesserle EO, Hobbie SE (2007) Fire effects on insect herbivores in an oak savanna: the role of light and nutrients. Ecol Entomol 32:754–761. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2007.00925.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kelly SL, Song H, Jenkins DG (2015) Land management practices interactively affect wetland beetle ecological and phylogenetic community structure. Ecol Appl 25:891–900. doi: 10.1890/14-1225.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim TN, Holt RD (2012) The direct and indirect effects of fire on the assembly of insect herbivore communities: examples from the Florida scrub habitat. Oecologia 4:997–1012. doi: 10.1007/s00442-011-2130-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liston A, St. Hilaire K, Wilson M (1995) Genetic diversity in populations of Kincaid’s lupine, host plant of fender’s blue butterfly. Madroño 42:309–322Google Scholar
  32. Marion GM, Henry GHR, Freckman DW, Johnstone J, Jones G, Jones MH, Lévesque E, Molau U, Mølgaard P, Parsons AN, Svoboda J, Virginia RA (1997) Open-top designs for manipulating field temperature in high-latitude ecosystems. Glob Change Biol 3:20–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.1997.gcb136.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maxwell JA (1998) The conservation of the Karner blue butterfly (Lycaeides melissa samuelis Nabokov): ecological studies on habitat creation and management. PhD dissertation, Department of Entomology; University of Wisconsin; Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  34. McElderry RM, Salvato MH, Horvitz CC (2015) Population viability models for an endangered endemic subtropical butterfly: effects of density and fire on population dynamics and risk of extinction. Biodivers Conserv 24:1589–1608. doi: 10.1007/s10531-015-0877-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2015) Climate observation and monitoring. Retrieved from http://www.noaa.gov/climate.html
  36. New TR (2014) Insects, fire and conservation. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 111–126Google Scholar
  37. New TR, Van Praagh BD, Yen AL (2000) Fire and the management of habitat quality in an Australian lycaenid butterfly, Paralucia pyrodiscus lucida Crosby, the Eltham copper. Metamorphosis 11:154–163Google Scholar
  38. Nowicki P, Marczyk J, Kajzer-Bonk J (2015) Metapopulations of endangered Maculinea butterflies are resilient to large-scale fire. Ecohydrology 8:398–405. doi: 10.1002/eco.1484 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Panzer R (2002) Compatibility of prescribed burning with the conservation of insects in small, isolated prairie reserves. Conserv Biol 16:1296–1307. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01077.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parr CL, Andersen AN (2008) Fire resilience of ant assemblages in long-unburnt savanna of northern Australia. Austral Ecol 33:830–838. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2008.01848.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Parr CL, Andersen AN, Chastagnol C, Duffaud C (2007) Savanna fires increase rates and distances of seed dispersal by ants. Oecologia 151:33–41. doi: 10.1007/s00442-006-0570-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Pellissier L, Litsios G, Fiedler K, Pottier J, Dubuis A, Pradervand J-N, Salamin N, Guisan A (2012) Loss of interactions with ants under cold climate in a regional myrmecophilous butterfly fauna. J Biogeogr 39:1782–1790. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02743.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peterson MA (1993) The nature of ant attendance and the survival of larval Icaricia acmon (lycaenidae). J Lepid Soc 47:8–16Google Scholar
  44. Pierce NE, Braby MF, Heath A, Lohman DJ, Mathew J, Rand DB, Travassos MA (2002) The ecology and evolution of ant association in the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera). Annu Rev Entomol 47:733–771. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145257 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Piper RW, Lewis Z, Compton SG (2014) Life in the leaf-litter: a novel metal detector technique to investigate the over-wintering survival of rare, case-bearing beetle larvae. J Insect Conserv 18:1163–1169. doi: 10.1007/s10841-014-9727-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Podgaiski LR, Joner F, Lavorel S, Moretti M, Ibanez S, Mendonca MD, de Milton S Jr, Pillar D (2013) Spider trait assembly patterns and resilience under fire-induced vegetation change in South Brazilian grasslands. PLoS ONE 8:1–11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
  48. Radho-Toly S, Majer JD, Yates C (2001) Impact of fire on leaf nutrients, arthropod fauna and herbivory of native and exotic eucalypts in Kings Park, Perth, Western Australia. Austral Ecol 26:500–506. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2001.01133.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Raison RJ (1979) Modification of the soil environment by vegetation fires, with particular reference to nitrogen transformations: a review. Plant Soil 51:73–108. doi: 10.1007/BF02205929 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ratchford JS, Wittman SE, Jules ES, Ellison AM, Gotelli NJ, Sanders NJ (2005) The effects of fire, local environment and time on ant assemblages in fens and forests. Divers Distrib 11:487–494. doi: 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00192.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (2001) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Oxf Univ Press, Oxford, pp 235–266Google Scholar
  52. Schultz CB, Crone EE (1998) Burning prairie to restore butterfly habitat: a modeling approach to management tradeoffs for the Fender’s blue. Restor Ecol 6:244–252. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-100X.1998.00637.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schultz CB, Hammond PC, Wilson MV (2003) Biology of the Fender’s blue butterfly (Icaricia icarioides fenderi Macy), an endangered species of western Oregon native prairies. Nat Areas J 23:61–71Google Scholar
  54. Severns PM, Meyers SC, Tran T (2012) Taxonomic clarification of Lupinus oreganus and Lupinus biddlei in the Pacific Northwest, USA. West N Am Nat 72:407–411. doi: 10.3398/064.072.0314 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stadler B, Fiedler K, Kawecki TJ, Weisser WW (2001) Costs and benefits for phytophagous myrmecophiles: when ants are not always available. Oikos 92:467–478. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.920308.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stamp NE (1986) Physical constraints of defense and response to invertebrate predators by pipevine caterpillars (Battus philenor: Papilionidae). J Lepid Soc 40:191–205Google Scholar
  57. Swengel AB (1996) Effects of fire and hay management on abundance of prairie butterflies. Biol Conserv 76:73–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Therneau T (2014) A package for survival analysis in S. R package version 2.37-7. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival
  59. Thomas JA, Simcox DJ, Clarke RT (2009) Successful conservation of a threatened Maculinea butterfly. Science 325:80–83. doi: 10.1126/science.1175726 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Trager MD, Daniels JC (2009) Ant tending of Miami Blue Butterfly larvae (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): partner diversity and effects on larval performance. Florida Entomol 92:474–482. doi: 10.1653/024.092.0309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2010) Recovery plan for the prairie species of Western Oregon and Southwestern Washington. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon, pp xi-241Google Scholar
  62. Vogel JA, Debinski DM, Koford RR, Miller JR (2007) Butterfly responses to prairie restoration through fire and grazing. Biol Conserv 140:78–90. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wikars LO (2002) Dependence on fire in wood-living insects: an experiment with burned and unburned spruce and birch logs. J Insect Conserv 6:1–12. doi: 10.1023/A:1015734630309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zuur AF (2012) A Beginner’s Guide to generalized additive models with R. Highland Statistics Ltd., NewburghGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norah Warchola
    • 1
    • 2
  • Carole Bastianelli
    • 3
  • Cheryl B. Schultz
    • 4
  • Elizabeth E. Crone
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Harvard ForestHarvard UniversityPetershamUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyTufts UniversityMedfordUSA
  3. 3.Biosciences DepartmentEcole Normale Supérieure de LyonLyonFrance
  4. 4.Biological SciencesWashington State UniversityVancouverUSA

Personalised recommendations