Advertisement

Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 1037–1051 | Cite as

The biology and ecology of the large blue butterfly Phengaris (Maculinea) arion: a review

  • Matthew P. Hayes
REVIEW PAPER

Abstract

It has long been known that Phengaris (Maculinea) arion has a complex lifecycle involving the social parasitisation of ants. However, research triggered by the extinction of the original UK population of P. arion in 1979 has greatly enhanced our knowledge of this butterfly. Adults lay their eggs on Thymus spp. and ovipositional patterns seem to be dictated by host plant bud phenology and be independent of host ant presence. After feeding for around 3 weeks P. arion larvae fall to the ground and await adoption by host ants of the genus Myrmica. To achieve adoption P. arion larvae employ various forms of appeasement and mimicry, of which chemical and acoustic mimicry seem to be especially important for gaining colony integration and raising larval status respectively. The predatory larvae of P. arion then proceed to eat their host ants’ brood until they are ready to pupate. In the UK P. arion appears to be restricted to one primary host ant, Myrmica sabuleti, but across Europe a more complex pattern of host ant use seems to be occurring. In the UK the niche of M. sabuleti consists of closely cropped grassland and it is thought that a decline in these areas led to the extinction of P. arion in 1979. Scrub clearance and the implementation of grazing regimes has since enabled the successful reintroduction of P. arion to the UK, where sites are maintained to allow high densities of the specific larval host plant and host ant to co-occur.

Keywords

Phengaris arion Myrmica sabuleti Social parasitism Ovipositional cues Host mimicry Host ant specificity Ecological niche Micro-climate 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank my supervisor Professor Brian Huntley for providing guidance and support throughout the writing of this review.

References

  1. Akino T, Knapp JJ, Thomas JA, Elmes GW (1999) Chemical mimicry and host specificity in the butterfly Maculinea rebeli, a social parasite of Myrmica ant colonies. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 266:1419–1426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Als TD, Vila R, Kandul NP, Nash DR, Yen SH, Hsu YF, Mignault AA, Boomsma JJ, Pierce NE (2004) The evolution of alternative parasitic life histories in large blue butterflies. Nature 432:386–390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen A, Simcox DJ, Thomas JA, Nash DR (2014) Assessing reintroduction schemes by comparing genetic diversity of reintroduced and source populations: a case study of the globally threatened large blue butterfly (Maculinea arion). Biol Conserv 175:34–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbero F, Bonelli S, Thomas JA, Balletto E, Schonrogge K (2009a) Acoustical mimicry in a predatory social parasite of ants. J Exp Biol 212:4084–4090CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbero F, Thomas JA, Bonelli S, Balletto E, Schonrogge K (2009b) Queen ants make distinctive sounds that are mimicked by a butterfly social parasite. Science 323:782–785CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbero F, Patricelli D, Witek M, Balletto E, Casacci LP, Sala M, Bonelli S (2012) Myrmica ants and their butterfly parasites with special focus on the acoustic communication. Psyche 2012:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnett LK, Warren MS (1995) Species action plan: LARGE BLUE, Maculinea arion. Butterfly Conservation, WarehamGoogle Scholar
  8. Bereczki J, Toth JP, Sramko G, Varga Z (2014) Multilevel studies on the two phenological forms of Large Blue (Maculinea arion) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). J Zool Syst Evol Res 52:32–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bereczki J, Racz R, Varga Z, Toth JP (2015) Controversial patterns of Wolbachia infestation in the social parasitic Maculinea butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Org Divers Evol 15:591–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Casacci LP, Witek M, Barbero F, Patricelli D, Solazzo G, Balletto E, Bonelli S (2011) Habitat preferences of Maculinea arion and its Myrmica host ants: implications for habitat management in Italian Alps. J Insect Conserv 15:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapman TA (1916a) What the larva of Lycaena arion does during its last instar. Trans R Entomol Soc Lond 63:291–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chapman TA (1916b) Observations completing an outline of the life history of Lycaena arion. Trans R Entomol Soc Lond 63:298–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarke RT, Thomas JA, Elmes GW, Hochberg ME (1997) The effects of spatial patterns in habitat quality on community dynamics within a site. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 264:347–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clarke RT, Thomas JA, Elmes GW, Wardlaw JC, Munguira ML, Hochberg ME (1998) Population modelling of the spatial interactions between Maculinea rebeli, their initial foodplant Gentiana cruciata and Myrmica ants within a site. J Insect Conserv 2:29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Czekes Z, Marko B, Nash DR, Ferencz M, Lazar B, Rakosy L (2014) Differences in oviposition strategies between two ecotypes of the endangered myrmecophilous butterfly Maculinea alcon (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) under unique syntopic conditions. Insect Conserv Diver 7:122–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dennis RLH (1977) The British butterflies their origin and establishment. E W Classey, FaringdonGoogle Scholar
  17. Dennis RLH (1993) Butterflies and climate change. Manchester University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  18. Dennis RLH, Dapporto L, Fattorini S, Cook LM (2011) The generalism-specialism debate: the role of generalists in the life and death of species. Biol J Linn Soc 104:725–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elmes GW, Thomas JA (1992) Complexity of species conservation in managed habitats—interaction between Maculinea butterflies and their ant hosts. Biodivers Conserv 1:155–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elmes GW, Wardlaw JC (1982a) A population study of the ants Myrmica sabuleti and Myrmica scabrinodis, living at 2 sites in the south of England. 1. A comparison of colony populations. J Anim Ecol 51:651–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elmes GW, Wardlaw JC (1982b) A population study of the ants Myrmica sabuleti and Myrmica scabrinodis living at 2 sites in the south of England. 2. Effect of above-nest vegetation. J Anim Ecol 51:665–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Elmes GW, Thomas JA, Wardlaw JC, Hochberg ME, Clarke RT, Simcox DJ (1998) The ecology of Myrmica ants in relation to the conservation of Maculinea butterflies. J Insect Conserv 2:67–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elmes GW, Thomas JA, Munguira ML, Fiedler K (2001) Larvae of lycaenid butterflies that parasitize ant colonies provide exceptions to normal insect growth rules. Biol J Linn Soc 73:259–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elmes GW, Akino T, Thomas JA, Clarke RT, Knapp JJ (2002) Interspecific differences in cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of Myrmica ants are sufficiently consistent to explain host specificity by Maculinea (large blue) butterflies. Oecologia 130:525–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fiedler K (1997) Geographical patterns in life-history traits of Lycaenidae butterflies—ecological and evolutionary implications. Zool Anal Complex Syst 100:336–347Google Scholar
  26. Fiedler K (1998) Lycaenid-ant interactions of the Maculinea type: tracing their historical roots in a comparative framework. J Insect Conserv 2:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fric Z, Wahlberg N, Pech P, Zrzavy J (2007) Phylogeny and classification of the Phengaris-Maculinea clade (Lepidoptera : Lycaenidae): total evidence and phylogenetic species concepts. Syst Entomol 32:558–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Frohawk FW (1906) Completion of the life-history of Lycaena arion. Entomologist 39:115–147Google Scholar
  29. Frohawk FW (1916) Further observations on the last stage of the larvae of Lycaena arion. Trans R Entomol Soc Lond 63:313–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Furst MA, Nash DR (2010) Host ant independent oviposition in the parasitic butterfly Maculinea alcon. Biol Lett 6:174–176PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Griebeler EM (2011) Are individual based models a suitable approach to estimate population vulnerability?—a case study. Comput Ecol Softw 1:14–24Google Scholar
  32. Hochberg ME, Elmes GW, Thomas JA, Clarke RT (1996) Mechanisms of local persistence in coupled host-parasitoid associations: the case model of Maculinea rebeli and Ichneumon eumerus. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 351:1713–1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hochberg ME, Elmes GW, Thomas JA, Clarke RT (1998) Effects of habitat reduction on the persistence of Ichneumon eumerus (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), the specialist parasitoid of Maculinea rebeli (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). J Insect Conserv 2:59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jansen SHDR, Holmgren M, Van Langevelde F, Wynhoff I (2012) Resource use of specialist butterflies in agricultural landscapes: conservation lessons from the butterfly Phengaris (Maculinea) nausithous. J Insect Conserv 16:921–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jones R (2015) Conservation officer, butterfly conservation. Email to the author, 5 October. Personal communicationGoogle Scholar
  36. Kajzer-Bonk J, Nowicki P, Bonk M, Skorka P, Witek M, Woyciechowski M (2013) Local populations of endangered Maculinea (Phengaris) butterflies are flood resistant. J Insect Conserv 17:1105–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lenoir A, D’Ettorre P, Errard C, Hefetz A (2001) Chemical ecology and social parasitism in ants. Annu Rev Entomol 46:573–599CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Muggleton J, Benham BR (1975) Isolation and the decline of the large blue butterfly Maculinea arion in Great Britain. Biol Conserv 7:119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Musche M, Anton C, Worgan A, Settele J (2006) No experimental evidence for host ant related oviposition in a parasitic butterfly. J Insect Behav 19:631–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nowicki P, Halecki W, Kalarus K (2013) All natural habitat edges matter equally for endangered Maculinea butterflies. J Insect Conserv 17:139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Patricelli D, Barbero F, La Morgia V, Casacci LP, Witek M, Balletto E, Bonelli S (2011) To lay or not to lay: oviposition of Maculinea arion in relation to Myrmica ant presence and host plant phenology. Anim Behav 82:791–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pech P, Fric Z, Konvicka M, Zrzavy J (2004) Phylogeny of Maculinea blues (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) based on morphological and ecological characters: evolution of parasitic myrmecophily. Cladistics 20:362–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pech P, Fric Z, Konvicka M (2007) Species-specificity of the Phengaris (Maculinea)-Myrmica host system: fact or myth? (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae; Hymenoptera : Formicidae). Sociobiology 50:983–1003Google Scholar
  44. Radchuk V, WallisDeVries MF, Schtickzelle N (2012) Spatially and financially explicit population viability analysis of Maculinea alcon in the Netherlands. PLoS ONE 7:e38684PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Sala M, Casacci LP, Balletto E, Bonelli S, Barbero F (2014) Variation in butterfly larval acoustics as a strategy to infiltrate and exploit host ant colony resources. PLoS ONE 9:1–9Google Scholar
  46. Schlick-Steiner BC, Steiner FM, Hottinger H, Nikiforov A, Mistrik R, Schafellner C, Baier P, Christian E (2004) A butterfly’s chemical key to various ant forts: intersection-odour or aggregate-odour multi-host mimicry? Naturwissenschaften 91:209–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Schonrogge K, Wardlaw JC, Peters AJ, Everett S, Thomas JA, Elmes GW (2004) Changes in chemical signature and host specificity from larval retrieval to full social integration in the myrmecophilous butterfly Maculinea rebeli. J Chem Ecol 30:91–107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Settele J, Kuehn E, Thomas JA (eds) (2005) Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe: species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model, vol 2. Pensoft Publishers, SofiaGoogle Scholar
  49. Settele J, Barbero F, Musche M, Thomas JA, Schonrogge K (2011) Singing the blues: from experimental biology to conservation application. J Exp Biol 214:1407–1410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Sielezniew M, Stankiewicz-Fiedurek AM (2008) Myrmica sabuleti (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) not necessary for the survival of the population of Phengaris (Maculinea) arion (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in eastern Poland: lower host-ant specificity or evidence for geographical variation of an endangered social parasite? Eur J Entomol 105:637–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sielezniew M, Stankiewicz-Fiedurek AM (2013) Behavioural evidence for a putative oviposition-deterring pheromone in the butterfly, Phengaris (Maculinea) teleius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Eur J Entomol 110:71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sielezniew M, Buszko J, Stankiewicz AM (2005) Maculinea arion in Poland: distribution, ecology and conservation prospects. In: Settele J, Kuehn E, Thomas JA (eds) Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe: species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model, vol 2. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, pp 231–233Google Scholar
  53. Sielezniew M, Dziekanska I, Stankiewicz-Fiedurek AM (2010) Multiple host-ant use by the predatory social parasite Phengaris (=Maculinea) arion (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). J Insect Conserv 14:141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Simcox DJ (2015) Large Blue Butterfly Committee Project Officer, University of Oxford. Email to the author, 12 October. Personal communicationGoogle Scholar
  55. Sliwinska EB, Nowicki P, Nash DR, Witek M, Settele J, Woyciechowski M (2006) Morphology of caterpillars and pupae of European Maculinea species (Lepidoptera : Lycaenidae) with an identification table. Entomol Fennica 17:351–358Google Scholar
  56. Solazzo G, Seidelmann K, Moritz RFA, Settele J (2015) Tetracosane on the cuticle of the parasitic butterfly Phengaris (Maculinea) nausithous triggers the first contact in the adoption process by Myrmica rubra foragers. Physiol Entomol 40:10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tartally A (2005) Neotypus melanocephalus (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae): the first record of a parasitoid wasp attacking Maculinea teleius (Lycaenidae). Nota Lepid 28:65–67Google Scholar
  58. Thomas JA (1977) The ecology of the large blue butterfly. Inst Terr Ecol Anu Rep 1976:25–27Google Scholar
  59. Thomas JA (1980) Why did the large blue become extinct in Britain? Oryx 15:243–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thomas JA (2002) Larval niche selection and evening exposure enhance adoption of a predacious social parasite, Maculinea arion (large blue butterfly), by Myrmica ants. Oecologia 132:531–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thomas JA, Elmes GW (1993) Specialized searching and the hostile use of allomones by a parasitoid whose host, the butterfly Maculinea-rebeli, inhabits ant nests. Anim Behav 45:593–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thomas JA, Elmes GW (1998) Higher productivity at the cost of increased host-specificity when Maculinea butterfly larvae exploit ant colonies through trophallaxis rather than by predation. Ecol Entomol 23:457–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Thomas JA, Elmes GW (2001) Food-plant niche selection rather than the presence of ant nests explains oviposition patterns in the myrmecophilous butterfly genus Maculinea. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 268:471–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Thomas JA, Simcox DJ (2005) Contrasting management requirements of Maculinea arion across latitudinal and altitudinal climatic gradients in west Europe. In: Settele J, Kuehn E, Thomas JA (eds) Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe: species ecology along a European gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a model. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, pp 240–244Google Scholar
  65. Thomas JA, Elmes GW, Wardlaw JC, Woyciechowski M (1989) Host specificity among Maculinea butterflies in Myrmica ant nests. Oecologia 79:452–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Thomas JA, Simcox DJ, Wardlaw JC, Elmes GW, Hochberg ME, Clarke RT (1998) Effects of latitude, altitude and climate on the habitat and conservation of the endangered butterfly Maculinea arion and its Myrmica ant hosts. J Insect Conserv 2:39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Thomas JA, Simcox DJ, Clarke RT (2009) Successful conservation of a threatened Maculinea butterfly. Science 325:80–83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Thomas JA, Schonrogge K, Bonelli S, Barbero F, Balletto E (2010) Corruption of ant acoustical signals by mimetic social parasites Maculinea butterflies achieve elevated status in host societies by mimicking the acoustics of queen ants. Commun Integr Biol 3:169–171PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Thomas JA, Simcox DJ, Hovestadt T (2011) Evidence based conservation of butterflies. J Insect Conserv 15:241–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ugelvig LV, Nielsen PS, Boomsma JJ, Nash DR (2011a) Reconstructing eight decades of genetic variation in an isolated Danish population of the large blue butterfly Maculinea arion. BMC Evol Biol 11:201PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Ugelvig LV, Vila R, Pierce NE, Nash DR (2011b) A phylogenetic revision of the Glaucopsyche section (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae), with special focus on the Phengaris-Maculinea clade. Mol Phylogenet Evol 61:237–243CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Van Dyck H, Oostermeijer JGB, Talloen W, Feenstra V, Van Der Hidde A, Wynhoff I (2000) Does the presence of ant nests matter for oviposition to a specialized myrmecophilous Maculinea butterfly? Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 267:861–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Witek M, Sliwinska EB, Skorka P, Nowicki P, Wantuch M, Vrabec V, Settele J, Woyciechowski M (2008) Host ant specificity of large blue butterflies Phengaris (Maculinea) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) inhabiting humid grasslands in East-Central Europe. Eur J Entomol 105:871–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wynhoff I (1998) The recent distribution of the European Maculinea species. J Insect Conserv 2:15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wynhoff I, Grutters M, Van Langevelde F (2008) Looking for the ants: selection of oviposition sites by two myrmecophilous butterfly species. Anim Biol 58:371–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wynhoff I, Bakker RB, Oteman B, Arnaldo PS, Van Langevelde F (2015) Phengaris (Maculinea) alcon butterflies deposit their eggs on tall plants with many large buds in the vicinity of Myrmica ants. Insect Conserv Diver 8:177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Biological and Biomedical SciencesDurham UniversityDurhamUK

Personalised recommendations