Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 449–455 | Cite as

The potential of diversion structures to reduce roadway mortality of the endangered Hine’s emerald dragonfly (Somatochlora hineana)

  • Amber N. Furness
  • Daniel A. Soluk


Roadways near wetlands and ponds inflict high roadkill rates on a wide variety of taxa. For threatened or endangered species that typically do not have large adult populations, fast reproduction rates, and/or rapid recolonization rates, such mortality is likely to have significant population consequences. Thus, exploring ways to reduce roadkill rates will have considerable conservation benefits. In this study, we evaluate whether a diversion structure can be used to modify flight behavior of the endangered Hine’s emerald dragonfly (Somatochlora hineana) in ways that would reduce roadway mortality. Flight behavior of adult S. hineana was observed with and without two 3 m high nets spaced at 6 and 12 m to simulate a small and a larger roadway. The netting significantly deterred (p < 0.0001) S. hineana adults from crossing the simulated roadway. Flight height was also influenced significantly (p = 0.0025) with flight heights over the 6 m net spacing being higher than those over the 12 m spacing. This study suggests that the use of diversion netting in areas where sensitive dragonfly species interact with motor vehicles might aid in reducing roadway mortality and might help reduce the overall impact of roadways on wetland ecosystems.


Roadkill Endangered species Mitigation Insect conservation Diversion netting 



We thank the Wisconsin Chapter of The Nature Conservancy who provided housing and research facilities and the University of Wisconsin at Green Bay for their cooperation in accessing Toft Point State Natural Area. Ruth Wollman’s help in conducting this experiment was crucial and was greatly appreciated. We also thank Mark Dixon, Jacob Kerby, and Kristopher Pitcher for help with analyses and edits. In addition, we thank the two anonymous reviewers for helpful suggestions that improved the manuscript. Funding was provided by a contract from the Illinois State Toll Highway Authority. This study was funded by contract number I-05-7724.

Conflict of interest

The author Soluk has received research contracts from the Illinois State Toll Highway Authority.


  1. Bager A, Fontoura V (2013) Evaluation of the effectiveness of a wildlife roadkill mitigation system in wetland habitat. Ecol Eng 53:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bard AM, Smith HT, Egensteiner ED, Mulholland R, Harber TV, Heath GW, Miller WJB, Weske JS (2002) A simple structural method to reduce road-kills of royal terns at bridge sites. Wildl Soc B 30(2):603–605Google Scholar
  3. Barichivich WJ, Dodd DK Jr (2002) The effectiveness of wildlife barriers and underpasses on U. S. Highway 441 across Paynes Prairie State Preserve, Alachua County, Florida. Phase II-Post Construction. Final Report. July 2002. Florida Department of Transportation Contract No. BB-854Google Scholar
  4. Calvo RN, Silvy NJ (1996) Key deer mortality, U.S. 1 in the Florida Keys. In: Evink GL, Garret P, Zeigler D, Berry J (eds) Trends in addressing transportation related wildlife mortality. No. FL-ER-58-96. Florida Department of Transportation. Tallahassee, FL, pp 337–348Google Scholar
  5. Clevenger AP, Waltho N (2000) Factors influencing the effectiveness of wildlife underpasses in Banff National Park, Alberta, Canada. Conserv Biol 14:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dover JW, Fry GLA (2001) Experimental simulation of some visual and physical components of a hedge and the effects on butterfly behaviour in an agricultural landscape. Entomol Exp Appl 100:221–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Evink GL, Garret P, Zeigler D, Berry J (eds) (1996) Trends in addressing transportation related wildlife mortality. No. FL-ER-58-96. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, FLGoogle Scholar
  8. Forman RTT, Alexander LE (1998) Roads and their major ecological effects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:207–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Forman RTT, Deblinger RD (1998) The ecological road-effect zone for transportation planning, and a Massachusetts highway example. In: Evink GL, Garrett P, Zeigler D, Berry J (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on wildlife ecology and transportation. Publication FL-ER-69-98. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, pp 78–96Google Scholar
  10. Forman RTT, Friedman DS, Fitzhenry D, Martin JD, Chen AS, Alexander LE (1997) Ecological effects of roads: toward three summary indices and an overview for North America. In: Canters K (ed) Habitat fragmentation and infrastructure. Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, Delft, pp 40–54Google Scholar
  11. Foster SE, Soluk DA (2004) Evaluating exuvia collection as a management tool for the federally endangered Hine’s emerald dragonfly, Somatochlora hineana Williamson (Odonata: Cordullidae). Biol Conserv 18:15–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fry GLA, Robson WJ (1994) The effects of field margins on butterfly movement. In: Boatman N (ed) Br Crop Pr, vol Monograph no. 58. BCPC Publications, Warwick, pp 111–116Google Scholar
  13. Furness AN (2014) Why shouldn’t the dragonfly cross the road? The influence of roadway construction and vehicle speed on the behavior, mortality, and conservation of adult dragonflies (Odonata: Anisoptera). Thesis, University of South DakotaGoogle Scholar
  14. Harris LD, Scheck J (1991) From implications to applications: the dispersal corridor principle applied to the conservation of biological diversity. In: Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ (eds) Nature conservation 2: the role of corridors. Surrey Beatty, Chipping Norton, pp 189–220Google Scholar
  15. Hayward MW, Kerley GIH (2009) Fencing for conservation: restriction of ecological potential or a riposte to threatening processes? Biol Conserv 142:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hsu JW (2010) Ministry gives migrating butterflies helping hand. Taipei Times. Assessed 10 Mar 2014
  17. Huijser MP, Kociolek A, McGowen P, Hardy A, Clevenger AP, Ament R (2007) Wildlife-vehicle collision and crossing mitigation measures: a toolbox for the Montana department of transportation. Final Report. The state of Montana Department of Transportation, Helena, MontanaGoogle Scholar
  18. Hunt A, Dickens HJ, Whelan RJ (1987) Movement of mammals through tunnels under railway lines. Aust Zool 24:89–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jaeger JAG, Fahrig L (2004) Under what conditions do fences reduce the effects of roads on population persistence? Conserv Biol 18:1651–1657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mader HJ (1984) Animal habitat isolation by roads and agricultural fields. Biol Conserv 29:81–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mader HJ, Schell C, Kornacker P (1990) Linear barriers to arthropod movements in the landscape. Biol Conserv 54:209–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Markham D (1996) The significance of secondary effects from roads and road transport on nature conservation. English Nature Research Reports No. 178Google Scholar
  23. Mata C, Hervàs I, Herranz J, Suàrez F, Malo JE (2004) Effectiveness of wildlife crossing structures and adapted culverts in a highway in Northwest Spain. In: Irwin CL, Garrett P, McDermott KP (eds) Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on ecology and transportation. Center for Transportation and the Environment, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, pp 265–276Google Scholar
  24. McKenna DD, McKenna KM, Malcom SB, Berenbaum MR (2001) Mortality of Lepidoptera along roadways in central Illinois. J Lepid Soc 55:63–68Google Scholar
  25. National Research Council (1997) Toward a sustainable future: addressing the long-term effects of motor vehicle transportation on climate and ecology. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC. Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). July 2013. Yellowstone Road-Kill FOIA Summary. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  26. Pintor LM, Soluk DA (2006) Evaluating the non-consumptive, positive effects of a predator in the persistence of an endangered species. Biol Conserv 130:584–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rao RSP, Girish MKS (2007) Road kills: assessing insect casualties using flagship taxon. Curr Sci India 92:830–837Google Scholar
  28. Riffell SK (1999) Road mortality of dragonflies (Odonata) in a great lakes coastal wetland. Great Lakes Entomol 32:63–73Google Scholar
  29. Severns PM (2008) Road crossing behavior of an endangered grassland butterfly, Icaricia icarioides fenderi macy (Lycaenidae), between a subdivided population. J Lepid Soc 62:53–56Google Scholar
  30. Skórka P, Lenda M, Moroń D, Kalarus K, Tryjanowski P (2013) Factors affecting road mortality and the suitability of road verges for butterflies. Biol Conserv 159:148–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith DM (2007) Butterflies and vehicles don’t mix: milkweed butterflies protected on migration. Suite. Assessed 7 Mar 2014
  32. Soluk DA, Moss K (2003) Roadway and exuvial surveys of the Hine’s emerald dragonfly (Somatochlora hineana) in Door County, Wisconsin. Part II: Roadway fatalities. Aquatic Ecology Technical Report 03/09. Natural History Survey, Champaign, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  33. Soluk DA, Zercher DS, Pintor LM, Herbert ME, Hults AB, Gittinger EJ, Stalzer SA (2000) Evaluation of habitat and ecology of the larvae of Hine’s emerald dragonfly (Somatochlora hineana) in Wisconsin and Illinois. Illinois Natural History Survey, Center for Aquatic Ecology Technical Report 00/1Google Scholar
  34. Soluk DA, Zercher DS, Worthington AM (2011) Influence of roadways on patterns of mortality and flight behavior of adult dragonflies near wetland areas. Biol Conserv 144:1638–1643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Trombulak SC, Frissell CA (2000) Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conserv Biol 14:18–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. van der Grift EA, van der Ree R, Fahrig L, Findlay S, Houlahan J, Jaeger JAG, Klar N, Madrinan LF, Olson L (2013) Evaluating the effectiveness of road mitigation measures. Biodivers Conserv 22:425–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. World Bank (2015) Road density (km of road per 100 sq. km of land area). Retrieved from
  38. Yamada Y, Sasaki H, Harauchi Y (2010) Composition of road-killed insects on coastal roads around Lake Shikotsu in Hokkaido, Japan. J Rakuno Gakuen Univ 34:177–184Google Scholar
  39. Zielin SB, de Rivera CE, Smith WP, Jacobson SL (2011) Exploring mitigation options to reduce vehicle-caused mortality of a threatened butterfly. Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of South DakotaVermillionUSA

Personalised recommendations