Advertisement

Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 657–665 | Cite as

The preservation value of a tiny sacred forest of the oak Quercus calliprinos and the impact of livestock presence

  • Jean Jacques Itzhak Martinez
  • Ziv Amar
ORIGINAL PAPER
  • 148 Downloads

Abstract

Small holy woods protected for centuries for cultural purposes may have conservation value for small animals, despite their tiny sizes. To verify this hypothesis we used transects to quantified ants in a small sacred forest in a hot Mediterranean region, and the impact of cattle presence in part of it. We hypothesized that it should be mainly inhabited by species having a northern temperate distribution. We detected ants belonging to 39 species including 15 new species for the region. As expected, the majority of them had Palearctic distribution, while others were endemic to the Levant. All of them were known to live in regions with temperate climate. The presence of cattle did not statistically impact on either the number of species or on their biodiversity indices: the average number of ant species per transect was 21 ± 4.6 (SD) in the presence of cows and 23 ± 4.8 in their absence. As hypothesized, the main impact of cattle was on community composition: in the presence of cattle more species were specialists for, or tolerant to, disturbed habitats, resulting in a relatively low Jaccard coefficient of similarity between the two parts of the forest (Sj = 0.56). In conclusion, this small sacred forest, protected for centuries, facilitates the conservation of a great number of shade-loving ant species in a hot region by providing suitable habitats, but the presence of livestock reduces the conservation value of the forest by promoting ant species tolerant to disturbed habitats.

Keywords

Ants Biodiversity conservation Chao2 estimator Formicidae Holy wood Nature reserve 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Israel Taxonomy Initiative for having financed this research. We acknowledge Ionescu-Hirsch from the National Collections of Natural History at Tel Aviv University for species identification and voucher preservation; our technician Maayan Rauch who helped us in the field work and laboratory and Carly Golodets for proofreading the manuscript. We are also grateful to the Israel Nature and Parks Authority for having permitted the research in the Bar’am forest reserve (permit nb: 2011/38058).

References

  1. Agosti D, Alonso LE (2000) The ALL protocol. A standard protocol for the collection of ground-dwelling ants. In: Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE, Schultz TRE (eds) Ants. Standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp 204–206Google Scholar
  2. Alonso LE, Agosti D (2000) Biodiversity studies, monitoring, and ants: an overview. In: Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE, Schultz TRE (eds) Ants. Standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  3. Andersen AN, Hoffmann BD, Muller WJ, Griffiths AD (2002) Using ants as bioindicators in land management: simplifying assessment of ant community responses. J Appl Ecol 39:8–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armbrecht I, Perfecto I, Vandermeer J (2004) Enigmatic biodiversity correlations: ant diversity responds to diverse resources. Science 304:284–286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azcárate M, Peco B (2011) Abandonment of grazing in a Mediterranean grassland area: consequences for ant assemblages. Insect Conserv Divers 5:279–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belsky AJ, Blumenthal DM (1997) Effects of livestock grazing on stand dynamics and soils in upland forests of the Interior West. Conserv Biol 11:315–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bestelmeyer BT, Wiens JA (2001) Ant biodiversity in semiarid landscape mosaics: the consequences of grazing vs. natural heterogeneity. Ecol Appl 11:1123–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bestelmeyer BT, Agosti D, Alonso LE, Brandao CRF, Brown WL Jr, Delabie HC, Silvestre R (2000) Field techniques for the study of ground-dwelling ants: an overview, description, and evaluation. In: Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE, Schultz TRE (eds) Ants. Standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp 122–144Google Scholar
  9. Bhagwat SA, Kushalappa CG, Williams PH, Brown ND (2005) A landscape approach to biodiversity conservation in the Western Ghats of India. Conserv Biol 19:1853–1862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bossart JL, Opuni-frimpong E, Kuudaar S, Nkrumah E (2006) Richness, abundance and complementarity of fruit-feeding butterfly species in relic sacred forests and forest reserves of Ghana. BiodiversConserv 15:333–359Google Scholar
  11. Boulton AM, Davies KF, Ward PS (2005) Species richness, abundance, and composition of ground-dwelling ants in the northern California grasslands: role of plants, soil, and grazing. Environ Entomol 34:96–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brühl CA, Eltz T, Linsennair KE (2003) Size does matter- effects of tropical rainforest fragmentation on the leaf litter ant community in Sabah, Malaysia. Biodivers Conserv 12:1371–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bugalho MN, Lecompte X, Gonçalves M, Branco M (2011) Establishing grazing and grazing-excluded patches increases plant and invertebrate diversity in a Mediterranean oak woodland. Forest Ecol Manag 261:2133–2139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cardelús CL, Scull P, Hair J, Baimas’ George M, Lowman MD, Eshete AW (2013) A preliminary assessment of Ethiopian sacred grove status at the landscape and ecosystem scales. Diversity 5:320–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chandran MDS, Hughes JD (2000) Sacred groves and conservation: the comparative history of traditional reserves in the Mediterranean area and in South India. Environ Hist 6:169–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chao A (1984) Non-parametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand J Stat 11:265–270Google Scholar
  17. Collinge SK (2000) Effects of grassland fragmentation on insect species loss. Colonization, and movement patterns. Ecology 81:2211–2226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Colwell RK (2013) EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9. Persistent. http://www.purl.oclc.org/estimates
  19. Dafni A (2007) The supernatural characters and powers of sacred trees in the Holy Land. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 3:10. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-3-10 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dahms H, Lenoir L, Lindborg R, Wolters V, Dauber J (2010) Restoration of seminatural grasslands: what is the impact on ants? Restor Ecol 18:330–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Decher J (1996) Conservation, small mammals, and the future of sacred groves in West Africa. Biodivers Conserv 6:1007–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Del Toro I, Ribbons RR, Pelini SL (2012) The little things that run the world revisited: a review of ant-mediated ecosystem services and disservices (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 17:133–146Google Scholar
  23. Fernandes TT, da Silva RR, de Souza DR, Araujo N, de Castro Morini MS (2012) Undecomposed twigs in the leaf litter as nest-building resources for ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in areas of the Atlantic forest in the southeastern region of Brazil. Psyche Article ID 896473. doi: 10.1155/2012/896473
  24. Folgarait PJ (1998) Ant biodiversity and its relationship to ecosystem functioning: a review. Biodivers Conserv 7:1221–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Forbes GS, Van Zee JW, Smith W, Whitford WG (2005) Desert grassland canopy arthropod species richness: temporal patterns and effects of intense, short-duration livestock grazing. J Arid Environ 60:627–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ginzburg O, Whitford WG, Steinberger Y (2008) Effects of harverster ants (Messor spp.) activity on soil properties and microbial communities in a Negev Desert ecosystem. Biol Fert Soils 45:165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Golodets C, Kigel H, Sternberg M (2010) Recovery of plant species composition and ecosystem function after cessation of grazing in a Mediterranean grassland. Plant Soil 329:365–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hadar L, Noy-Meir I, Perevolotsky A (1999) The effect of shrub clearing and grazing on the composition of a Mediterranean plant community: functional groups versus species. J Veg Sci 10:673–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hamilton LS (2002) Forest and tree conservation through metaphysical constraints. George Wright Forum 19:57–78Google Scholar
  30. Harding JS, Benfield EF, Bolstad PV, Helfman GS, Jones EBD III (1998) Stream biodiversity: the ghost of land use past. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95:14843–14847PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hester AJ, Edenius L, Buttenschon RM, Kuiters AT (2000) Interactions between forests and herbivores: the role of controlled grazing experiments. Forestry 73:381–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hoffmann BD (2000) Changes in ant species composition and community organization along grazing gradiens in semi-arid rangelands of the Northern Territory. Rangeland J 22:171–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Holway DA, Lach L, Suarez AV, Tsutsui ND, Case TJ (2002) The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:181–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jansen A, Robertson AI (2001) Relationship between livestock management and the ecological condition of riparian habitats along an Australian floodplain river. J Appl Ecol 38:63–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kerley GI, Whitford WG (2000) Impact of grazing and desertification in the Chihuahuan desert: plant communities, granivores and granivory. Am Midl Nat 144:78–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Krebs CJ (1998) Ecological methodology, 2nd edn. Addison Wesley Longman Inc, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  38. Longino JT (2000) What to do with the data. In: Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE, Schultz TRE (eds) Ants. Standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp 186–203Google Scholar
  39. Majer JD (1983) Ants: bioindicators of minesite rehabilitation, land-use and land conservation. Environ Manage 7:375–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Martinez JJI (2008a) Biodiversity of ant nesting in fire breaks of pine forests in Israel. Vie Milieu 58:233–236Google Scholar
  41. Martinez JJI (2008b) Seed harvester and scavenger ants on roads. Zool Middle East 44:75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Martinez JJI, Inbar M (2009) Ant biodiversity in the Mediterranean Maquis. In: The 37th Congress of the Israel Society of Ecology and Environmental Sciences (Hebrew)Google Scholar
  43. Martinez JJY, Wool D (2003) Differential response of trees and shrubs to browsing and pruning: the effects on Pistacia growth and gall-inducing aphids. Plant Ecol 169:285–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967). The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  45. Milchunas DG, Lauenroth WK (1993) Quantitative effects of grazing on vegetation and soils over a global range of environments. Ecol Monogr 63:327–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nash MS, Bradford DF, Franson SE, Neale AC, Whitford WG, Heggem DT (2004) Livestock grazing effects on ant communities in the eastern Mojave Desert, USA. Ecol Indic 4:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Naveh Z (1998) From biodiversity to ecodiversity: holistic conservation of the biological and cultural diversity of Mediterranean landscapes. In: Rundel PW, Montenegro G, Jaksic FM (eds) Landscape disturbance and biodiversity in Mediterranean-Type Ecosystem. Ecological Studies 136, Springer, Berlin, pp 23–51Google Scholar
  48. Noy-Meir I, Kaplan D (2002) Species richness of annual legumes in relation to grazing in Mediterranean vegetation in northern Israel. Israel J Plant Sci 50(Suppl 1):95–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ofer J, Shulov A, Noy-Meir I (1978) Associations of ant species in Israel: a multivariate analysis. Israel J Entomol 27:199–208Google Scholar
  50. Perevolotsky A (2006) Livestock grazing and biodiversity conservation in Mediterranean environments: the Israeli experience. Options Méditerranéennes Série A 67:51–56Google Scholar
  51. Perevolotsky A, Seligman NG (1998) Role of grazing in Mediterranean rangeland ecosystems. Inversion of a paradigm. Bioscience 48:1007–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rabetaliana H, Randriambololona M, Schachenmann P (1999) The Andringitra National Park in Madagascar: the use of traditional knowledge and modern methods for the management of mountain natural resources. Unasylva 196: http://www.fao.org/docrep/x0963e/x0963e07.htm#theandringitranationalparkinmadagascar
  53. Ray R, Ramachandra TV (2010) Small sacred groves in local landscape: are they really worthy for conservation. Curr Sci 98:1178–1180Google Scholar
  54. Read JL, Andersen AN (2000) The value of ants as early warning bioindicators: responses to pulsed cattle grazing at an Australian arid zone locality. J Arid Environ 45:231–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Reichmann O, Chen Y, Litaor I (2013) Spatial model assessment of P transport from soils to waterways in an eastern Mediterranean watershed. Water 5:262–279Google Scholar
  56. Reyes-López J, Ruiz N, Fernández-Haeger J (2003) Community structure of ground-ants: the roe of single trees in a Mediterranean pastureland. Acta Oecol 24:195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schaaf T (2003) The importance of sacred natural sites for biodiversity conservation. In: International workshop on the importance of Sacred natural sites for biodiversity conservation, People’s Republic of China, pp 13–20Google Scholar
  58. Segev U (2010) Regional patterns of ant-species richness in an arid region: the importance of climate and biogeography. J Arid Environ 74:646–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Siitonen J (2001) Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecol Bull 49:11–41Google Scholar
  60. Stahlheber KA, D’Antonio CM (2013) Using livestock to manage plant composition: a meta-analysis of grazing in California Mediterranean grasslands. Biol Conserv 157:300–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Statistix Version 9.0 (2008) Analytical Software. P.O. Box 12185. Tallahassee, FL 32317–2185, USAGoogle Scholar
  62. Tshiguvo TE, Dean WRJ, Robertson HG (1999) Conservation value of road verges in the semi-arid Karoo, South Africa: ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as bio-indicators. Biodivers Conserv 8:1683–1695Google Scholar
  63. Turner IM, Corlett RT (1996) The conservation value of small, isolated fragments of lowland tropical rain forest. Trends Ecol Evol 11:330–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Underwood EC, Fisher BL (2006) The role of ants in conservation monitoring: if, when, and how. Biol Conserv 132:166–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Verdu JR, Crespo MB, Galante E (2000) Conservation strategy of a nature reserve in Mediterranean ecosystems: the effects of protection from grazing on biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 9:1707–1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vonshak M, Ionescu-Hirsch A (2009) A checklist of the ants of Israel (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Israel J Entomol 39:33–56Google Scholar
  67. Wakelin SA, Gregg AL, Simpson RJ, Li GD, Riley IT, McKay AC (2009) Pasture management clearly affects soil microbial community structure and N-cycling bacteria. Pedobiologia 52:237–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Westphal C, von Oheimb G, Meyer-Grunefed M, Tremer N, Härdtle W, Levanony T, Dayan T, Assmann T (2009) Ya’ar Bar’am—an old Quercus calliprinos forest of a high nature conservation value in the Mediterranean region of Israel. Israel J Plant Sci 57:13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wittman SE (2014) Impacts of invasive ants on native ant communities (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 19:111–123Google Scholar
  70. Zar JH (2009) Biostatistical analysis, 5th edn. Prentice-Hall International (UK) Limited, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental SciencesTel Hai Academic CollegeUpper GalileeIsrael
  2. 2.Animal Ecology LabMigal, Galilee Research Institute LtdKiryat ShmonaIsrael

Personalised recommendations