Can Malaise traps be used to sample spiders for biodiversity assessment?
- 215 Downloads
Malaise traps are typically used to sample a range of flying insect groups; however non-target taxa such as spiders may also be collected in large numbers. In this study, spiders were sampled in peatlands and wet grasslands and catches in Malaise and pitfall traps were compared in order to determine the adequacy of Malaise traps for use in spider biodiversity assessment. Overall, the number of species and individuals caught in Malaise and pitfall traps were comparable, although more species were sampled in Malaise traps in locations with a greater structural diversity of the vegetation. The spider fauna sampled by the Malaise traps differed from that of the pitfall traps, but both methods consistently separated the species assemblages by biotope. These results demonstrate that Malaise traps are effective at sampling spiders and indicate that they can be used in biodiversity assessment. In addition the complementary species sampled by each method mean that employing both techniques will be useful where a full inventory of the species is required. The authors do not suggest that Malaise traps should be used solely to sample spiders; however, if traps are set to collect insects, identification of the spiders sampled may reduce the need to employ additional sampling techniques.
KeywordsBiodiversity assessment By-catch Invertebrate sampling Malaise traps Pitfall traps Spiders (Araneae)
Our thanks go to Mark Wilson and Noreen Burke for help in the field and all of our colleagues on the Bioforest project and Rebecca Martin for help with analysis. In addition to this we would like to thank Myles Nolan, Robert Johnston and Peter Merrett for help with identifying difficult specimens. This research was conducted as part of the BIOFOREST Project (http://Bioforest.ucc.ie/) which was funded by COFORD and the EPA under the National Development Plan 2001–2006.
- Butler L, Kondo C, Barrows EM, Townsend EC (1999) Effects of weather conditions and trap types on sampling for richness and abundance of forest macrolepidoptera. Environ Entomol 28:795–811Google Scholar
- Curtis DJ (1980) Pitfalls in spider community studies (Arachnida: Araneae). J Arachnol 8:271–280Google Scholar
- Greenstone M (1984) Determinants of web spider species diversity: vegetation structural diversity vs prey availability. Oncologia 62:299–304Google Scholar
- Harvey P, Nellist D, Telfer M (2002) Provisional atlas of British spiders (Arachnida, Araneae), vol 1 & 2. Biological Records Centre, HuntingdonGoogle Scholar
- Lang A, Barthel J, Schröder P, Pfadenhauer J, Munch JC (2008) Spiders (Araneae) in Arable land: species community, influence of land use on diversity, and biocontrol significance. In: Perspectives for agroecosystem management. Elservier, San Diego, pp 307–326Google Scholar
- Mefford MJ, McCune B (2007) PC ord for windows version 5. MjM Softrware, OregonGoogle Scholar
- Merret P, Snazell R (1983) A comparison of pitfall trapping and vacuum sampling for assessing spiders faunas on heathland at Ashdown forest, south-east England. Bull Br Arachnol Soc 6:1–13Google Scholar
- Mommertz S, Schauer C, Klosters N, Lang A, Filser J (1996) A comparison of D-vac suction, fenced and unfenced pitfall trap sampling of epigeal arthropods in agroecosystems. Ann Zool Fenn 33:181–201Google Scholar
- Oxbrough A (2008) Irish spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) collected during a five-year, island-wide study including 696 new county records. Bull Ir Biogeog Soc 32:97–127Google Scholar
- Roberts M (1993) The spiders of Great Britain and Ireland (compact edition). Harley Books, ColchesterGoogle Scholar
- Smith G, Gittings T, Wilson MW, Oxbrough A, Iremonger S, O’Halloran J, Kelly DL, O’Sullivan A, O’Donoghue S, McKee AM, Neville P, O’ Donnell V, Kelly T, et al. (2006) Biodiversity assessment of afforestation sites. Report prepared for the COFORD and EPA, DublinGoogle Scholar
- Southwood TRE, Henderson P (2000) Ecological methods. Blackwell Science Limited, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Speight M (2000) Syrph the net: a database of biological information about European Syrphidae (Diptera) and its use in relation to conservation of biodiversity. In: Rushton B (ed) Biodiversity: the Irish dimension. The Royal Irish Academy, Dublin, pp 156–171Google Scholar
- SPSS for windows version 11.0 2002. SPSS, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Standen V (2000) The adequacy of collecting techniques for estimating species richness of grassland invertebrates. Adv Appl Ecol Tech 37:884–893Google Scholar
- Uetz G (1991) Habitat structure and spider foraging. In: Bell S, McCoy E, Mushinsky H (eds) Habitat structure. The physical arrangement of objects in space. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Uetz G (1999) Guild structure of spiders in major crops. J Arachnol 27:270–280Google Scholar
- Uetz G, Unzicker J (1976) Pitfall trapping in ecological studies of wandering spiders. J Arachnol 3:101–111Google Scholar
- van Helsdingen PJ (1996) The county distribution of Irish spiders, incorporating a revised catalogue of the species. Ir Nat J Special Zoological Supplement 92Google Scholar