Captive rearing of Puget blue butterflies (Icaricia icarioides blackmorei) and implications for conservation
- 164 Downloads
The use of captive rearing to promote recovery of endangered butterflies has substantially increased over the last decade. These programs have the potential to play a significant role in butterfly population recovery, but the effects of captive conditions are poorly understood and rarely are traits of captive individuals assessed relative to traits in their founding populations. To develop rearing protocols and investigate possible effects of captive conditions, we reared Puget blue butterflies (Icaricia icarioides blackmorei), a subspecies closely related to the endangered Fender’s blue (I. i. fenderi) which is limited to Oregon, USA. We reared individuals from two wild populations in Washington, USA to investigate two approaches for egg collection (collect eggs in the wild vs. collect eggs from adult females which were brought to a greenhouse for oviposition) and three diapause environments (in indoor facilities at two independent locations vs. outdoors in enclosures). Survival from egg to adult was similar across all captive groups which survived past diapause and was less than 10%. Captive reared individuals were lighter and had smaller wings and shorter body lengths than their founding populations for both sites. Based on our findings, we recommend that rearing programs compare characteristics of reared individuals to individuals from the founding population to quantify possible effects of captive conditions, diapause individuals in natural environments, and for programs with survival rates similar to rates in the wild, consider alternatives to augment declining populations and reintroduce historic ones.
KeywordsButterflies Conservation Captive husbandry Morphology Reintroduction
Funds for this project were provided by the American Zoo and Aquarium Association through the Conservation Endowment Fund, Oregon Zoo’s Future for Wildlife Fund, US Fish and Wildlife Service and Washington State University. Other agencies that provided support to the project include Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and the U.S. Army at Fort Lewis. We thank C. Hazen and K. Casteel for assistance with greenhouse propagation and data preparation. We thank D. Shepherdson, E. Crone, B. Tissot, T. New and two anonymous reviewers for reviewing earlier versions of this manuscript.
- Dudley R (1990) Biomechanics of flight in neotropical butterflies: morphometrics and kinematics. J Exp Biol 150:37–53Google Scholar
- Dzurisin J, Schultz CB (2004) Captive rearing to promote endangered butterfly recovery: case study of the Puget blue butterfly. Report to the American Zoo and Aquarium Association.Google Scholar
- Ellsworth CL, Tolson PJ, Magdich ML (2002) Captive breeding and reintroduction of the Karner Blue Butterfly, Lycaeides melissa samuelis, to the Oak Openings of Lucas County, Ohio. Toledo Zoological Gardens, Toledo, OHGoogle Scholar
- Gibbs M, Lace LA, Jones MJ, Moore AJ (2004) Intraspecific competition in the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeria: effect of rearing density and gender on larval life history. J Insect Sci 4:16Google Scholar
- Herms CP, McCulloug DG, Miller DL, Bauer LS, Haack RA (1996) Laboratory rearing of Lycaides melissa samuelis (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae), an endangered butterfly in Michigan. Great Lakes Entomol 29:63–75Google Scholar
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) www.noaa.gov. Accessed April 2008
- Pyle RM (2002) The butterflies of Cascadia. Seattle Audobon Society, SeattleGoogle Scholar
- Schultz CB, Hammond PC, Wilson MV (2003) The biology of the Fender’s blue butterfly (Icaricia icarioides fenderi), an endangered species of western Oregon native prairies. Nat Areas J 23:61–71Google Scholar
- Schultz CB, Russell C, Wynn L (2008) Restoration, reintroduction and captive propagation efforts for at-risk butterflies: a review of British and American conservation efforts. Isr J Ecol Evol Special Issue Butterfly Conserv 54:41–61Google Scholar
- Shepherdson D, Csuti B, Andersen M, Steele J (2001) Oregon silverspot butterfly (Speyeria zerene hippolyta) Cascade Head population supplementation. In: Cadigan L, Girton K (eds) American zoo and aquarium association annual conference proceedings. AZA, St. Louis, pp 217–221Google Scholar