Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

On a habitat structure-based approach to evaluating species occurrence: cavity-nesting Hymenoptera in a secondary tropical forest remnant

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Measuring bee and wasp community habitat preferences in natural systems may provide insights for biodiversity management and conservation as habitat heterogeneity can be the major factor affecting species diversity in a community. Here, we present evidence that supports the use of a vegetation structure-based approach in order to predict the occurrence of common Brazilian-remnant solitary bee and wasp species. Using trap nests, we sampled Aculeate bees and wasps in a forest remnant within an urban area of southeast Brazil. We also measured eight habitat structure components in the area. Tree trunk circumference, shrub and wood log abundance were good predictors of presence or absence of the commonest solitary bee and wasp species in the study area. We demonstrated that even on a small scale it is possible to detect significant influences of habitat structural features on species occurrences and that some of them are effective as surrogates for predicting trap-nesting Hymenoptera occurrence in a given area. Our data present evidence on the potential application of a habitat structure-based approach in conservation assessments concerning cavity-nesting Hymenoptera. We caution, however, that this habitat structure-based approach must to be taken with prudence as a detailed survey of an area’s biodiversity is always preferable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • De Souza ALT, Martins RP (2004) Distribution of plant-dwelling spiders: inflorescences versus vegetative branches. Austral Ecol 29:342–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis RLH (2004) Just how important are non-consumable resources as habitat components? Indications from a declining lycaenid butterfly with priority conservation status. J Insect Conserv 8:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Van Dyck H (2003) Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint. Oikos 102:417–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Van Dyck H (2006) Habitats and resources: the need for a resource-based definition to conserve butterflies. Biodivers Conserv 15:1943–1966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Sheppard DA (2007) Species conservation and landscape management: a habitat perspective. In: Stewart A, New T, Lewis O (eds) Insect conservation biology. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxfordshire UK, pp 92–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Didham RK, Ghazoul J, Stork NE et al (1996) Insects in fragmented forests: a functional approach. Trends Ecol Evol 11:255–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia MVB, Adis J (1993) On the biology of Penepodium goryanum (Lepeletier) in wooden trap-nests (Hymenoptera, Sphecidae). Proc Entomol Soc Wash 95:547–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia MVB, Adis J (1995) Comportamento de nidificação de Trypoxylon (Trypargilum) rogenhoferi KOHL (Hymenoptera, Sphecidae) em uma floresta inundável de várzea na Amazônia Central. Amazoniana 13:259–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Halaj J, Ross DW, Moldenke AR (1998) Habitat structure and prey availability as predictors of the abundance and community organization of spiders in western Oregon forest canopies. J Arachnol 26:203–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Halaj J, Ross DW, Moldenke AR (2000) Importance of habitat structure to the arthropod food-web in Douglas-fir canopies. Oikos 90:139–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatley CL, Macmahon JA (1980) Spider community organization: seasonal variation and the role of vegetation architecture. Environ Entomol 9:632–639

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera CM (1988) Variation in mutualisms: the spatio-temporal mosaic of a pollinator assemblage. Biol J Linn Soc 35:95–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassau SA, Hochuli DF (2004) Effects of habitat complexity on ant assemblages. Ecography 27:157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassau SA, Hochuli DF (2005) Wasp community responses to habitat complexity in Sydney sandstone forests. Austral Ecol 30:179–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassau SA, Hochuli DF, Cassis G et al (2005) Effects of habitat complexity on forest beetle diversity: do functional groups respond consistently? Divers Distrib 11:73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loyola RD, Martins RP (2006) Trap-nest occupation by solitary wasps and bees (Hymenoptera: Aculeata) in a forest urban remanent. Neotrop Entomol 35:41–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loyola RD, Martins RP (2007) Habitat structure components are effective predictors of trap-nesting Hymenoptera diversity. Basic App Ecol (in press). doi:10.1016/j.baae.2007.06.016

  • Loyola RD, Brito SL, Ferreira RL (2006) Ecosystem disturbances and diversity increase: implications for invertebrate conservation. Biodivers Conserv 15:25–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maes D, Shreeve TG, Dennis RLH (2006) Editorial. A special issue on insect habitats. J Insect Conserv 10:89–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minckley RL, Cane JH, Kervin L et al (1999) Spatial predictability and resource specialization of bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) at a superabundant, widespread resource. Biol J Linn Soc 67:119–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morato EF, Campos LAO (2000) Efeitos da fragmentação florestal sobre vespas e abelhas solitárias em uma área da Amazônia Central. Rev Bras Zool 17:429–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Morato EF, Martins RP (2006) An overview of proximate factors affecting the nesting behavior of solitary wasps and bees (Hymenoptera: Aculeata) in preexisting cavities in wood. Neotrop Entomol 35:285–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noss RF, Cooperrider AY (1994) Saving nature’s legacy: protecting and restoring biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Panzer R, Schwartz MW (1998) Effectiveness of a vegetation-based approach to insect conservation. Conserv Biol 12:693–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penagos DI, Williams T (1995) Important factors in the biology of Heteronomous hyperparasitoids (Hym.: Aphelinidae): agents for the biological control of whiteflies and scale insects. Acta Zoológica Mexicana Nueva Series 66:31–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Jones CG (2000) Generation of heterogeneity by organisms: creation, maintenance and transformation. In: Hutchings MJ, John EA, Stewart AJA (eds) The ecological consequences of environment heterogeneity. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 33–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts SG, Vulliamy B, Roberts S et al (2005) Role of nesting resources in organising diverse bee communities in a Mediterranean landscape. Ecol Entomol 30:78–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart AJA, John EA, Hutchings MJ (2000) The world is heterogeneous: ecological consequences of living in a patchy environment. In: Hutchings MJ, John EA, Stewart AJA (eds) The ecological consequences of environment heterogeneity. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • SYSTAT Software, Inc. (2002) SYSTAT Version 10.2

  • Tscharntke T, Gathmann A, Steffan-Dewenter I (1998) Bioindication using trap-nesting bees and wasps and their natural enemies: community structure and interactions. J Appl Ecol 35:708–719

    Google Scholar 

  • Tylianakis JM, Klein AM, Tscharntke T (2005) Spatiotemporal variation in the diversity of Hymenoptera across a tropical habitat gradient. Ecology 86:3296–3302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinson SB, Frankie GW, Barthell J (1993) Threats to the diversity of solitary bees in a Neotropical dry forest in Central America. In: Lasalle J, Gauld ID (eds) Hymenoptera and biodiversity. CAB International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams NM, Minckley RL, Silveira FA (2001) Variation in native bee faunas and its implications for detecting community changes. Conserv Ecol 5:art#7

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanette LRS, Martins RP, Ribeiro SP (2005) Effects of urbanization on Neotropical wasp and bee assemblages in a Brazilian metropolis. Landsc Urban Plan 71:105–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

R.D.L. and R.P.M. were supported by CAPES and CNPq, respectively. We thank Tim New, Jason M. Tylianakis, Jeremy Field, Klaus Hövemeyer and three anonymous referees for their comments on the manuscript. We also thank Eric Lucas for language improvements. Alexsander A. Azevedo identified the Anthodioctes megachiloides, and Elder F. Morato confirmed our Trypoxylon spp. identifications.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael Dias Loyola.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loyola, R.D., Martins, R.P. On a habitat structure-based approach to evaluating species occurrence: cavity-nesting Hymenoptera in a secondary tropical forest remnant. J Insect Conserv 13, 125–129 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-007-9126-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-007-9126-1

Keywords

Navigation