Abstract
Measuring bee and wasp community habitat preferences in natural systems may provide insights for biodiversity management and conservation as habitat heterogeneity can be the major factor affecting species diversity in a community. Here, we present evidence that supports the use of a vegetation structure-based approach in order to predict the occurrence of common Brazilian-remnant solitary bee and wasp species. Using trap nests, we sampled Aculeate bees and wasps in a forest remnant within an urban area of southeast Brazil. We also measured eight habitat structure components in the area. Tree trunk circumference, shrub and wood log abundance were good predictors of presence or absence of the commonest solitary bee and wasp species in the study area. We demonstrated that even on a small scale it is possible to detect significant influences of habitat structural features on species occurrences and that some of them are effective as surrogates for predicting trap-nesting Hymenoptera occurrence in a given area. Our data present evidence on the potential application of a habitat structure-based approach in conservation assessments concerning cavity-nesting Hymenoptera. We caution, however, that this habitat structure-based approach must to be taken with prudence as a detailed survey of an area’s biodiversity is always preferable.
References
De Souza ALT, Martins RP (2004) Distribution of plant-dwelling spiders: inflorescences versus vegetative branches. Austral Ecol 29:342–349
Dennis RLH (2004) Just how important are non-consumable resources as habitat components? Indications from a declining lycaenid butterfly with priority conservation status. J Insect Conserv 8:37–45
Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Van Dyck H (2003) Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint. Oikos 102:417–426
Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Van Dyck H (2006) Habitats and resources: the need for a resource-based definition to conserve butterflies. Biodivers Conserv 15:1943–1966
Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Sheppard DA (2007) Species conservation and landscape management: a habitat perspective. In: Stewart A, New T, Lewis O (eds) Insect conservation biology. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxfordshire UK, pp 92–126
Didham RK, Ghazoul J, Stork NE et al (1996) Insects in fragmented forests: a functional approach. Trends Ecol Evol 11:255–260
Garcia MVB, Adis J (1993) On the biology of Penepodium goryanum (Lepeletier) in wooden trap-nests (Hymenoptera, Sphecidae). Proc Entomol Soc Wash 95:547–553
Garcia MVB, Adis J (1995) Comportamento de nidificação de Trypoxylon (Trypargilum) rogenhoferi KOHL (Hymenoptera, Sphecidae) em uma floresta inundável de várzea na Amazônia Central. Amazoniana 13:259–282
Halaj J, Ross DW, Moldenke AR (1998) Habitat structure and prey availability as predictors of the abundance and community organization of spiders in western Oregon forest canopies. J Arachnol 26:203–220
Halaj J, Ross DW, Moldenke AR (2000) Importance of habitat structure to the arthropod food-web in Douglas-fir canopies. Oikos 90:139–152
Hatley CL, Macmahon JA (1980) Spider community organization: seasonal variation and the role of vegetation architecture. Environ Entomol 9:632–639
Herrera CM (1988) Variation in mutualisms: the spatio-temporal mosaic of a pollinator assemblage. Biol J Linn Soc 35:95–125
Lassau SA, Hochuli DF (2004) Effects of habitat complexity on ant assemblages. Ecography 27:157–164
Lassau SA, Hochuli DF (2005) Wasp community responses to habitat complexity in Sydney sandstone forests. Austral Ecol 30:179–187
Lassau SA, Hochuli DF, Cassis G et al (2005) Effects of habitat complexity on forest beetle diversity: do functional groups respond consistently? Divers Distrib 11:73–82
Loyola RD, Martins RP (2006) Trap-nest occupation by solitary wasps and bees (Hymenoptera: Aculeata) in a forest urban remanent. Neotrop Entomol 35:41–48
Loyola RD, Martins RP (2007) Habitat structure components are effective predictors of trap-nesting Hymenoptera diversity. Basic App Ecol (in press). doi:10.1016/j.baae.2007.06.016
Loyola RD, Brito SL, Ferreira RL (2006) Ecosystem disturbances and diversity increase: implications for invertebrate conservation. Biodivers Conserv 15:25–42
Maes D, Shreeve TG, Dennis RLH (2006) Editorial. A special issue on insect habitats. J Insect Conserv 10:89–93
Minckley RL, Cane JH, Kervin L et al (1999) Spatial predictability and resource specialization of bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) at a superabundant, widespread resource. Biol J Linn Soc 67:119–147
Morato EF, Campos LAO (2000) Efeitos da fragmentação florestal sobre vespas e abelhas solitárias em uma área da Amazônia Central. Rev Bras Zool 17:429–444
Morato EF, Martins RP (2006) An overview of proximate factors affecting the nesting behavior of solitary wasps and bees (Hymenoptera: Aculeata) in preexisting cavities in wood. Neotrop Entomol 35:285–298
Noss RF, Cooperrider AY (1994) Saving nature’s legacy: protecting and restoring biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, DC
Panzer R, Schwartz MW (1998) Effectiveness of a vegetation-based approach to insect conservation. Conserv Biol 12:693–702
Penagos DI, Williams T (1995) Important factors in the biology of Heteronomous hyperparasitoids (Hym.: Aphelinidae): agents for the biological control of whiteflies and scale insects. Acta Zoológica Mexicana Nueva Series 66:31–57
Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Jones CG (2000) Generation of heterogeneity by organisms: creation, maintenance and transformation. In: Hutchings MJ, John EA, Stewart AJA (eds) The ecological consequences of environment heterogeneity. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 33–52
Potts SG, Vulliamy B, Roberts S et al (2005) Role of nesting resources in organising diverse bee communities in a Mediterranean landscape. Ecol Entomol 30:78–85
Stewart AJA, John EA, Hutchings MJ (2000) The world is heterogeneous: ecological consequences of living in a patchy environment. In: Hutchings MJ, John EA, Stewart AJA (eds) The ecological consequences of environment heterogeneity. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 1–8
SYSTAT Software, Inc. (2002) SYSTAT Version 10.2
Tscharntke T, Gathmann A, Steffan-Dewenter I (1998) Bioindication using trap-nesting bees and wasps and their natural enemies: community structure and interactions. J Appl Ecol 35:708–719
Tylianakis JM, Klein AM, Tscharntke T (2005) Spatiotemporal variation in the diversity of Hymenoptera across a tropical habitat gradient. Ecology 86:3296–3302
Vinson SB, Frankie GW, Barthell J (1993) Threats to the diversity of solitary bees in a Neotropical dry forest in Central America. In: Lasalle J, Gauld ID (eds) Hymenoptera and biodiversity. CAB International, Wallingford
Williams NM, Minckley RL, Silveira FA (2001) Variation in native bee faunas and its implications for detecting community changes. Conserv Ecol 5:art#7
Zanette LRS, Martins RP, Ribeiro SP (2005) Effects of urbanization on Neotropical wasp and bee assemblages in a Brazilian metropolis. Landsc Urban Plan 71:105–121
Acknowledgements
R.D.L. and R.P.M. were supported by CAPES and CNPq, respectively. We thank Tim New, Jason M. Tylianakis, Jeremy Field, Klaus Hövemeyer and three anonymous referees for their comments on the manuscript. We also thank Eric Lucas for language improvements. Alexsander A. Azevedo identified the Anthodioctes megachiloides, and Elder F. Morato confirmed our Trypoxylon spp. identifications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Loyola, R.D., Martins, R.P. On a habitat structure-based approach to evaluating species occurrence: cavity-nesting Hymenoptera in a secondary tropical forest remnant. J Insect Conserv 13, 125–129 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-007-9126-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-007-9126-1