Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 12, Issue 6, pp 639–650 | Cite as

Dung beetle assemblages in primary forest and disturbed habitats in a tropical dry forest landscape in western Mexico

  • Ellen Andresen
Original Paper


Dung beetles (Scarabaeinae) are conspicuous components in most terrestrial ecosystems, performing important ecological functions and services. Being sensitive to several types of disturbance, they have been successfully used as indicators of habitat change. Dung beetle communities in tropical rainforests have been well studied, but considerably less information is available for tropical dry forests. In this study I sampled dung beetles in two undisturbed habitats, deciduous forest and semideciduous forest, and two disturbed habitats, secondary forest and open area habitat, in the Chamela-Cuixmala region of western Mexico. Dung beetle species with high indicator value for each habitat were identified. Beetle abundance, observed species richness and estimated species richness were similar in the three forest habitats, but significantly lower in the open area habitat. A more detailed analysis of species-specific abundances in the three forest habitats revealed some differences. Transects of one of the undisturbed habitats, the deciduous forest, were more similar to the non-adjacent transects of disturbed secondary forest, than to the adjacent undisturbed semideciduous forest transects. Unlike studies in other tropical sites that have found a decrease in equitability in Scarabaeinae assemblages between undisturbed forest and disturbed habitat (particularly open habitats), in the Chamela-Cuixmala region all four habitats showed similar low equitability in community structure, with two or three very dominant species.


Disturbance Indicator group Mexico Scarabaeinae Tropical dry forest 



I would like to thank F. Escobar and J. Noriega for their invaluable help in the processing and identification of dung beetles in the field, and G. Halffter, F. vaz de Mello, and L. Delgado for final species determinations. Many thanks to A. Cabrera, A. Castro, F. Escobar, J. Noriega, L. Pedroza, and S. Ramos for their assistance in the field. This manuscript greatly benefited from comments and suggestions by K. Vulinec and four anonymous reviewers. I thank the Chamela Biological Station from the Institute of Biology of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), for the logistical support. Financial support came from CONACYT I39107V, SEMARNAT-CONACYT 2004-01-56, CONACYT 35714-V, ORCYT-UNESCO 883.612.2.


  1. Amezquita SJM, Forsyth A, Lopera AT, Camacho AM (1999) Comparison of the composition and species richness of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in forest remnants in the Colombian Orinoquia. Acta Zoo Mex (New Series) 76:113–126Google Scholar
  2. Andresen E (2001) Effects of dung presence, dung amount, and secondary dispersal by dung beetles on the fate of Micropholis guyanensis (Sapotaceae) seeds in Central Amazonia. J Trop Ecol 17:61–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andresen E (2002) Dung beetles in a Central Amazonian rainforest and their ecological role as secondary seed dispersers. Ecol Entomol 27:257–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andresen E (2003) Effect of forest fragmentation on dung beetle communities and functional consequences for plant regeneration. Ecography 26:87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andresen E (2005) Effects of season and vegetation type on community organization of dung beetles in a tropical dry forest. Biotropica 37:291–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andresen E, Laurance SG (2007) Possible indirect effects of mammal hunting on dung beetle assemblages in Panama. Biotropica 39:141–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Andresen E, Levey DJ (2004) Effects of dung and seed size on secondary dispersal, seed predation, and seedling establishment of rain forest trees. Oecologia 139:145–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arellano L, Halffter G (2003) Gamma diversity: derived from and a determinant of alpha diversity and beta diversity. An analysis of three tropical landscapes. Acta Zool Mex (New Series) 90:27–76Google Scholar
  9. Arellano L, Favila ME, Huerta C (2005) Diversity of dung and carrion beetles in a disturbed Mexican tropical montane cloud forest and on shade coffee plantations. Biodiv Conserv 14:601–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Avendaño-Mendoza C, Morón-Ríos A, Cano EB, León-Cortés J (2005) Dung beetle community (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) in a tropical landscape at the Lachua Region, Guatemala. Biodiv Conserv 14:801–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bergstrom BC, Maki LR, Werner BA (1976) Small dung beetles as biological control agents: laboratory studies of beetle action on trichostrongylid eggs in sheep and cattle feces. Proc Helminthol Soc Wash 43:171–174Google Scholar
  12. Bullock SH, Solis-Magallanes JA (1990) Phenology of canopy trees of a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico. Biotropica 22:22–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bullock SH, Mooney HA, Medina E (eds) (1995) Seasonally dry tropical forests. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Burgos A, Maass JM (2004) Vegetation change associated with land-use in tropical dry forest areas of Western Mexico. Agr Ecosyst Environ 104:475–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ceballos G (1995) Vertebrate diversity, ecology and conservation in neotropical dry forests. In: Bullock SH, Mooney HA, Medina E (eds) Seasonally dry tropical forests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 195–220Google Scholar
  16. Ceballos G, Szekely A, García A, Rodríguez P, Noguera F (1999) Programa de manejo de la Reserva de la Biósfera Chamela-Cuixmala. Instituto Nacional de Ecología, SEMARNAP, MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  17. Chao A, Chazdon RL, Colwell RK, Schen T-J (2005) A new statistical approach for assessing similarity of species composition with incidence and abundance data. Ecol Lett 8:148–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chazdon RL, Colwell RK, Denslow JS, Guariguata MR (1998) Statistical methods for estimating species richness of woody regeneration in primary and secondary rain forests of northeastern Costa Rica. In: Dallmeier F, Comiskey JA (eds) Forest biodiversity research, monitoring and modeling: conceptual background and old world case studies. Parthenon Publishing, Paris, pp 285–309Google Scholar
  19. Colwell RK (2005) EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 7.5. User’s guide and application published at: Scholar
  20. Crawley MJ (1993) GLIM for ecologists. Blackwell Scientific Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Davis AJ (2000) Does reduced-impact logging help preserve biodiversity in tropical rainforests? A case study from Borneo using dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) as indicators. Environ Entomol 29:467–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Davis ALV, Philips TK (2005) Effect of deforestation on a southwest Ghana dung beetle assemblage (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) at the periphery of Ankasa Conservation Area. Environ Entomol 34:1081–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Davis AJ, Holloway JD, Huijbregts H, Kirk-Spriggs AH, Sutton SL (2001) Dung beetles as indicators of change in the forests of northern Borneo. J Appl Ecol 38:593–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Didham RK, Hammond PM, Stork NE (1998) Beetle species responses to tropical forest fragmentation. Ecol Monogr 68:295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dufrêne M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67:345–366Google Scholar
  26. Durán E, Balvanera P, Lott E, Segura G, Pérez-Jiménez A, Islas A, Franco M (2002) Estructura, composición y dinámica de la vegetación. In: Noguera FA, Vega-Rivera JH, García-Aldrete N, Quesada-Avendaño M (eds) Historia natural de Chamela. Instituto de Biología, UNAM, México, pp 443–472Google Scholar
  27. Escobar FS (1997) Estudio de la comunidad de coleópteros coprófagos (Scarabaeidae) en un remanente de bosque seco al norte del Tolima, Colombia. Caldasia 19:419–430Google Scholar
  28. Escobar FS (2000) Diversidad de coleópteros coprófagos (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) en un mosaico de habitats en al Reserva Natural Nukak, Guaviare, Colombia. Acta Zool Mex (New Series) 79:103–121Google Scholar
  29. Escobar FS (2004) Diversity and composition of dung beetle (Scarabaeinae) assemblages in a heterogeneous Andean landscape. Trop Zool 17:123–136Google Scholar
  30. Escobar FS, Lobo JM, Halffter G (2005) Altitudinal variation of dung beetle (Scarabaeidae: Scrabaeinae) assemblages in the Colombian Andes. Global Ecol Biogeogr 14:327–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Estrada A, Coates-Estrada R (1991) Howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata), dung beetles (Scarabaeidae) and seed dispersal: ecological interactions in the tropical rain forest of Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. J Trop Ecol 7:459–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Estrada A, Coates-Estrada R (2002) Dung beetles in continuous forest, forest fragments and in an agricultural mosaic habitat island at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Biodiv Conserv 11:1903–1918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Estrada A, Coates-Estrada R, Anzures-Dadda A, Cammarano P (1998) Dung and carrion beetles in tropical rain forest fragments and agricultural habitats at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. J Trop Ecol 14:577–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Favila ME, Halffter G (1997) The use of indicator groups for measuring biodiversity as related to community structure and function. Acta Zool Mex (New Series) 72:1–25Google Scholar
  35. Feer F (2000) Dung and carrion beetles of the rain forest of French Guiana: compostition and structure of the guild. Ann Soc Entomol Fr 36:119–145Google Scholar
  36. Feer F, Hingrat Y (2005) Effects of forest fragmentation on a dung beetle community in French Guiana. Conserv Biol 19:1103–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Feinsinger P (2001) Designing field studies for biodiversity conservation. Island Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  38. Fincher GT (1973) Nidification and reproduction of Phanaeus spp. in three textural classes of soil (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Coleopt Bull 27:33–37Google Scholar
  39. Francis B, Green M, Payne C (eds) (1993) The GLIM system: Release 4 Manual. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  40. García-Oliva F, Maass JM, Galicia L (1995) Rainstorm analysis and rainfall erosivity of a seasonal tropical region with a strong cyclonic influence on the Pacific Coast of Mexico. J Appl Meteorol 34:2491–2498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gotteli NJ, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 4:379–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Halffter G, Arellano L (2002) Response of dung beetle diversity to human-induced changes in a tropical landscape. Biotropica 34:144–154Google Scholar
  43. Halffter G, Edmonds WD (1982) The nesting behavior of dung beetles (Scarabaeinae). An ecological and evolutive approach. Instituto de Ecologia, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  44. Halffter G, Favila ME (1993) The Scarabaeinae (Insecta: Coleoptera) an animal group for analysing, inventoring and monitoring biodiversity in tropical rainforest and modified landscapes. Biol Int 27:15–21Google Scholar
  45. Halffter G, Matthews EG (1966) The natural history of dung beetles of the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Folia Entomol Mex 12–14:1–312Google Scholar
  46. Halffter G, Favila ME, Halffter V (1992) A comparative study of the structure of the scarab guild in Mexican tropical rain forest and derived ecosystems. Folia Entomol Mex 84:131–156Google Scholar
  47. Hanski I, Cambefort Y (eds) (1991) Dung beetle ecology. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  48. Harvey C, Gonzalez J, Somarriba E (2006) Dung beetle and terrestrial mammal diversity in forests, indigenous agroforestry systems and plantain monocultures in Talamanca, Costa Rica. Biodiv Conserv 15:555–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Horgan FG (2006) Aggregation and coexistence of dung beetles in montane rain forest and deforested sites in central Peru. J Trop Ecol 22:359–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Howden HF, Nealis VG (1975) Effects of clearing in a tropical rain forest on the composition of the coprophagous scarab beetle fauna (Coleoptera). Biotropica 7:777–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Janzen DH (1983) Seasonal change in abundance of large nocturnal dung beetles (Scarabaeidae) in a Costa Rican deciduous forest and adjacent horse pasture. Oikos 41:274–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Janzen DH (1988) Tropical dry forests: the most endangered major tropical ecosystem. In: Wilson EO (ed) Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, pp 130–137Google Scholar
  53. Kirk AA (1992) Dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) active in patch forest and pasture habitat in Santa Cruz province, Bolivia, during spring. Folia Entomol Mex 84:45–54Google Scholar
  54. Klein BC (1989) Effect of forest fragmentation on dung and carrion beetle communities in central Amazonia. Ecology 70:1715–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kohlmann B (1991) Dung beetles in subtropical North America. In: Hanski I, Cambefort Y (eds) Dung beetle ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 116–132Google Scholar
  56. Kohlmann B, Sánchez-Colón S (1984) Structure of a Scarabaeinae community: a numerical-behavioural study (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae). Acta Zool Mex 2:1–27Google Scholar
  57. Lande R, DeVries PJ, Walla TR (2000) When species accumulation curves intersect: implications for ranking diversity using small samples. Oikos 89:601–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Larsen T, Williams NM, Kremen C (2005) Extinction order and altered community structure rapidly disrupt ecosystem functioning. Ecol Lett 8:538–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lobo JM, Lumaret JP, Jay-Robert P (1998) Sampling dung beetles: effects of abiotic factors and farm practices. Pedobiol 42:252–266Google Scholar
  60. Losey JE, Vaughan M (2006) The economic value of ecological services provided by insects. BioScience 56:311–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lott EJ (1987) Floristic diversity and structure of upland and arroyo forests of coastal Jalisco. Biotropica 19:228–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Maass JM (1995) Conversion of tropical dry forest to pasture and agriculture. In: Bullock SH, Mooney HA, Medina E (eds) Seasonally dry tropical forests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 399–422Google Scholar
  63. Maass JM, Jaramillo V, Martínez-Yrízar A, García-Oliva F, Pérez-Jiménez A, Sarukhán J (2002) Aspectos funcionales del ecosistema de selva baja caducifolia en Chamela, Jalisco. In: Noguera FA, Vega-Rivera JH, García-Aldrete N, Quesada-Avendaño M (eds) Historia natural de Chamela. Instituto de Biología, UNAM, México, pp 525–542Google Scholar
  64. McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data. Version 4. Gleneden Beach, MjM Software Design, OregonGoogle Scholar
  65. McGeoch MA (1998) The selection, testing and application of terrestrial insects as bioindicators. Biol Rev 73:181–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. McGeoch MA, Chown SL (1998) Scaling up the value of bioindicators. Trends Ecol Evol 13:46–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. McKinney GT, Morley FHW (1975) The agronomic role of introduced dung beetles in grazing systems. J Appl Ecol 12:831–837Google Scholar
  68. Miranda CHB, dos Santos JCC, Bianchin I (1998) Contribution of Onthophagus gazella to soil fertility improvement by bovine fecal mass incorporation into the soil. 1. Greenhouse studies. Rev Brasil Zootec 27:681–685Google Scholar
  69. Mittal IC (1993) Natural manuring and soil conditioning by dung beetles. Trop Ecol 34:150–159Google Scholar
  70. Montes de Oca E (2001) Escarabajos coprófagos de un escenario ganadero típico de la región de Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz, México: Importancia del paisaje en la composición de un gremio funcional. Acta Zool Mex (New Series) 82:111–132Google Scholar
  71. Montes de Oca E, Halffter G (1998) Invasion of Mexico by two dung beetles previously introduced into the United States. Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ 33:37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Morón MA, Deloya C, Delgado-Castillo L (1988) Fauna de coleopteros Melolonthidae, Scarabaeidae y Trogidae de la región de Chamela, Jalisco, México. Folia Entomol Mex 77:313–378Google Scholar
  73. Noguera FA, Vega-Rivera JH, García-Aldrete N, Quesada-Avendaño M (eds) (2002) Historia natural de Chamela. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  74. Nummelin M, Hanski I (1989) Dung beetles of the Kibale forest, Uganda; comparison between virgin and managed forests. J Trop Ecol 5:349–352Google Scholar
  75. Ortiz-Avila T (2001) Estructura arbórea en sitios perturbados y caracterizados por la presencia de Mimosa arenosa (Willd.) Poir. var leiocarpa (D.C.) Barneby, en el bosque tropical seco de la costa de Jalisco, México. Dissertation, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  76. Osberg DC, Doube BM, Hanrahan SA (1994) Habitat specificity in African dung beetles: the effect of soil type on the survival of dung beetle immatures (Coleoptera Scarabaeidae). Trop Zool 7:1–10Google Scholar
  77. Padilla-Gil DN (2006) Relaciones biogeográficas de cuatro áreas de boque seco tropical (Colombia, Costa Rica y México) utilizando como grupo indicador los escarabajos copronecrófagos (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Dissertation, Instituto de Ecología, A. CGoogle Scholar
  78. Peck SB, Forsyth A (1982) Composition, structure, and competitive behaviour in a guild of Ecuadorian rain forest dung beetles (Coleoptera; Scarabaeidae). Can J Zool 60:1624–1634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pineda E, Moreno C, Escobar F, Halffter G (2005) Frog, bat and dung beetle diversity in the cloud forest and coffee agroecosystems of Veracruz, Mexico. Conserv Biol 19:400–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Quintero I, Roslin T (2005) Rapid recovery of dung beetle communities following habitat fragmentation in Central Amazonia. Ecology 86:3303–3311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sánchez-Azofeifa G, Quesada M, Rodrígues JP, Nassar JM, Stoner KE, Castillo A, Garvin T, Zent EL, Calvo-Alvarado JC, Kalacska MER, Fajardo L, Gamon JA, Cuevas-Reyes P (2005) Research priorities for Neotropical dry forests. Biotropica 37:477–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Scheffler PY (2005) Dung beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) diversity and community structure across three disturbance regimes in eastern Amazonia. J Trop Ecol 21:9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Schulze CH, Waltert M, Kessler PJA, Pitopang R, Shahabuddin, Veddeler D, Mühlenberg M, Gradstein SR, Leuschner C, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2004) Biodiversity indicator groups of tropical land-use systems: comparing plants, birds, and insects. Ecol Appl 14:1321–1333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Segura G, Balvanera P, Durán E, Pérez A (2003) Tree community structure and stem mortality along a water availability gradient in a Mexican tropical dry forest. Plant Ecol 169:259–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Shahabuddin, Schulze CH, Tscharntke T (2005) Changes of dung beetle communities from rainforests towards agroforestry systems and annual cultures in Sulawesi. Biodiv Conserv 14:863–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. W. H. Freeman and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  87. Spector S (2006) Scarabaeine dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scrabaeinae): an invertebrate focal taxon for biodiversity research and conservation. Coleopts Bull 5:71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Spector S, Ayzama S (2003) Rapid turnover and edge effects in dung beetle assemblages (Scarabaeidae) at a Bolivian Neotropical forest-savanna ecotone. Biotropica 35:394–404Google Scholar
  89. Trejo I, Dirzo R (2000) Deforestation of seasonally dry tropical forest: a national and local analysis in Mexico. Biol Conserv 94:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Vulinec K (2002) Dung beetle communities and seed dispersal in primary forest and disturbed land in Amazonia. Biotropica 34:297–309Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro de Investigaciones en EcosistemasUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMoreliaMexico

Personalised recommendations