Advertisement

Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 325–332 | Cite as

Road size and carrion beetle assemblages in a New York forest

  • Robert R. Dunn
  • James A. Danoff-Burg
Original Paper

Abstract

In many parts of the world, roads are the most common causes of forest fragmentation. We know roads can affect wildlife, but understand little the extent to which these effects depend on road type and use. We compared the effects of several road types upon a diverse, carrion frequenting beetle assemblage in rural New York State. We found no consistent effects of distance from road on the diversity, abundance or species density of beetles across road types. However, forests near highways and two-lane paved roads were significantly less diverse than were forests near dirt roads. The reduced diversity of beetles near roads was at least in part due to lower species turnover in space near dirt roads than near either type of paved roads. Our data suggest that all roads are not created equal and that comparably sized minimum-use paved roads have a substantially greater affect on fauna than dirt roads. Highways and two-lane paved roads appear to depress biodiversity even among relatively vagile animals like beetles.

Keywords

Roads Carrion Burying beetles Fragmentation Diversity Turnover 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Monica C. Sanchez and Nathan J. Sanders read versions of this manuscript and provided valuable comments. Katherine Pease helped with all aspects of the fieldwork. Research was supported by a grant from the Black Rock Forest Consortium to JDB and RRD.

References

  1. Andrews A (1990) Fragmentation of habitat by roads and utility corridors: a review. Aust Zool 26:130–141Google Scholar
  2. Andressen E (2003) Effect of forest fragmentation on dung beetle assemblages and functional consequences for plant regeneration. Ecography 26:87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cabeza M, Moilanen A (2001) Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity. Trend Ecol Conserv 16:242–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA (2001) Effect of forest structure on the flux of species into forest interiors. Conserv Biol 15:91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colwell RK (2001) EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples (Software and User’s Guide), Version 7. http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimatesGoogle Scholar
  6. Cook WM, Holt RD, Yao J (2001) Spatial variability in oviposition damage by periodical cicadas in a fragmented landscape. Oecologia 127:51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Driscoll DA (2005) Is the matrix a sea? Habitat specificity in a naturally fragmented landscape. Ecol Entomol 30:8–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Driscoll DA, Weir T (2005) Beetle responses to habitat fragmentation depend on ecological traits, habitat condition, and remnant size. Conserv Biol 19:182–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunn RR (2005) Insect extinctions, the neglected majority. Conserv Biol 19:1030–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elkie PC, Rempel RS (2001) Detecting scales of pattern in boreal forest landscapes. Forest Ecol Manage 147:253–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Estrada A, Coates-Estrada R (2002) Dung beetles in continuous forest, forest fragments and in an agricultural mosaic habitat island at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Biodivers and Conserv 11:1903–1918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foster DR (1992) Land-use history (1730–1990) and vegetation dynamics in central New England, U.S.A. J Ecol 80:753–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forman RTT, Sperling D, Bissonette JA, Clevenger AP, Cutshall CD, Dale VH, Fahrig L, France R, Goldman CR, Heanue K, Jones JA, Swanson FJ, Turrentine T, Winter TC (2003) Road ecology: science and solutions. Island Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  14. Gascon C, Lovejoy TE, Bierregaard RO, Malcolm JR, Stouffer PC, Vasconcelos HL, Laurence WF, Zimmerman B, Tocher M, Borges S (1999) Matrix habitat and species richness in tropical forest remnants. Biol Conserv 91:223–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gibbs J, Stanton E (2001) Habitat fragmentation and arthropod assemblage change: carrion beetles, phoretic mites and flies. Ecol Appl 11:79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 4:379–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gotelli NJ, Entsminger GL (2005) Ecosim: null models software for ecology, Version 6.0. Acquired Intelligence Inc, & Kesey-Bear. http://homepages.together.net/gentsmin/ecosim.htmGoogle Scholar
  18. Haffter G, Arellano L (2002) Response of dung beetle diversity to human-induced changes in a tropical landscape. Biotropica 34:144–154Google Scholar
  19. Haskell DG (2000) Effects of forest roads on macroinvertebrate soil fauna of the southern Appalachian mountains. Conserv Biol 14:57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hill JK, Collingham YC, Thomas CD, Blakeley DS, Fox R, Moss DB, Huntley B (2001) Impacts of landscape structure on butterfly range expansion. Ecol Lett 4:313–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Keller I, Nentwig W, Largiader CR (2004) Recent habitat fragmentation due to roads can lead to significant genetic differentiation in an abundant flightless ground beetle. Mol Ecol 13:2983–2994CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Klein B (1989) Effects of forest fragmentation on dung and carrion beetle assemblages in central Amazonia. Ecology 70:1715–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Koh LP, Dunn RR, Sodhi NS, Colwell RK, Proctor HC, Smith VS (2004) Species co-extinctions and the biodiversity crisis. Science 305:1632–1634CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lassau S, Hochuli DF (2003) Effects of Roads on Ant Assemblages in the Sydney Region: Are patterns scale-dependent? Rec South Austr Mus 7:283–290Google Scholar
  25. Laurence WF (1990) Comparative responses of five arboreal marsupials to tropical forest fragmentation. J Mammal 71:641–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laurence WF, Laurence SG, Ferreira LV, Rankin-de Merona JM, Gascon C, Lovejoy TE (1997) Biomass Collapse in Amazonian Forest Fragments. Science 278:1117–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lennon JJ, Koleff P, Greenwood JJD, Gaston KJ (2001) The geographical structure of British bird distributions: diversity, spatial turnover and scale. J Anim Ecol 70:966–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lomolino MV, Creighton JC (1996) Habitat selection, breeding success and conservation of the endangered American burying beetle Nicrophorus americanus. Biol Conserv 77:235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  30. Manly BFJ (1997) Randomization, Bootstrap, and Monte Carlo methods in Biology. Chapman and Hall, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  31. Murcia C (1995) Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trend Ecol Evol 10:58–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Norris DR, Stutchbury BJM (2001) Extraterritorial movements of a forest songbird in a fragmented landscape. Conserv Biol 15:729–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rosenzweig ML (2003) Reconciliation ecology and the future of species diversity. Oryx 37:194–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roslin T, Koivumen A (2000) Distribution and abundance of dung beetles in fragmented landscapes. Oecologia 127:69–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Samways MJ, Osborn R, Carliel F (1997) Effect of a highway on ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) species composition and abundance, with a recommendation for roadside verge width. Biodivers Conserv 6:903–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sikes DS (1994) Influences of ungulate carcasses on coleopteran communities in Yellowstone National Park, USA. MS Thesis, Montana State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  37. Spellerberg IF (1998) Ecological effect of roads and traffic: a literature review. Global Ecol Biogeogr Lett 7:317–333Google Scholar
  38. Trombulak SC, Frissell CA (2000) Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic assemblages. Conserv Biol 14:18–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Trumbo ST, Bloch PL (2000) Habitat Fragmentation and Burying Beetle Abundance and Success. J Insect Conserv 4:242–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wahlberg N, Klemetti T, Selonen V, Hanski I (2002) Metapopulation structure and movements in five species of checkerspot butterflies. Oecologia 130:33–43Google Scholar
  41. Wolf JM, Gibbs JP (2005) Silphids in urban forests: diversity and function. Urban Ecosyst 7:371–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ZoologyNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental BiologyCenter for Environmental Research and Conservation, Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations