Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 89–93 | Cite as


  • D. Maes
  • T. G. Shreeve
  • R. L. H. Dennis


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anthes, N., Fartmann, T., Hermann, G., Kaule, G. 2003Combining larval habitat quality and metapopulation structure – the key for successful management of pre-alpine Euphydryas aurinia coloniesJ. Insect Conserv.7175185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brommer, J.E., Fred, M. 1999Movement of the Apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo related to host plant and nectar plant patchesEcol. Entomol.24125131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dennis, R.L.H. 2004Butterfly habitats, broad-scale biotope affiliations, and structural exploitation of vegetation at finer scales: the matrix revisitedEcol. Entomol.29744752Google Scholar
  4. Dennis, R.L.H., Eales, H.T. 1997Patch occupancy in Coenonympha tullia (Lepidoptera: Satyridae): Habitat quality matters as much as patch size and isolationJ. Insect Conserv.1167176Google Scholar
  5. Dennis, R.L.H., Eales, H.T. 1999Probability of patch site occupancy in Coenonympha tullia (Müller) (Lepidoptera: Satryinae) determined from geographical and ecological dataBiol. Conserv.87295301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dennis, R.L.H., Hodgson, J.G., Grenyer, R., Shreeve, T.G., Roy, D.B. 2004Host plants and butterfly biology. Do host-plant strategies drive butterfly status?Ecol. Entomol.291226Google Scholar
  7. Dennis, R.L.H., Shreeve, T.G. 1996Butterflies on British and Irish Offshore Islands: Ecology and BiogeographyGem PublishingWallingford, OxonGoogle Scholar
  8. Dennis, R.L.H., Shreeve, T.G., Dyck, H. 2003Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpointOikos102417426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dennis R.L.H., Shreeve T.G. and Van Dyck H. 2005. Habitats and resources: the need for a resource-based definition to conserve butterflies. Biodiver. Conserv. in press.Google Scholar
  10. Dennis, R.L.H., Shreeve, T.G., Williams, W.R. 1995Taxonomic differentiation in species richness gradients among European butterflies (PapilionoideaHesperioidea): contribution of macroevolutionary dynamicsEcography182740Google Scholar
  11. Gurevitch, J., Morrison, J.A., Hedges, L.V. 2000The interaction between competition and predation: a meta-analysis of field experimentsAm. Nat.155435453CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gutierrez, D., Leon Cortes, J.L., Menendez, R., Wilson, R.J., Cowley, M.J R., Thomas, C.D. 2001Metapopulations of four lepidopteran herbivores on a single host plant, Lotus corniculatusEcology8213711386Google Scholar
  13. Hanski, I., Thomas, C.D. 1994Metapopulation dynamics and conservation: a spatially explicit model applied to butterfliesBiol. Conserv.68167180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hilszczañski, J., Gibb, H., Hjältén, J., Atlegrim, O., Johansson, T., Pettersson, R.B., Ball, J.P., Danell, K. 2005Parasitoids (HymenopteraIchneumonoidea) of saproxylic beetles are affected by forest successional stage and dead wood characteristics in boreal spruce forestBiol. Conserv.26456464Google Scholar
  15. Hodgson, J.G. 1993Commonness and rarity in British butterfliesJ. Appl. Ecol.30407427Google Scholar
  16. Huntley, B. 1988EuropeHuntley, B.Webb, T. eds. Vegetation HistoryKluwer Academic PublishersDordrecht341383Google Scholar
  17. Kotze, D.J., Samways, M.J. 1999Support for the multi-taxa approach in biodiversity assessment as shown by the epigaeic invertebrates in a Afromontane forest archipelagoJ. Insect Conserv.3125143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maes, D., Dyck, H. 2005Habitat quality and biodiversity indicator performances of a threatened butterfly versus a multispecies group for wet heathlands in BelgiumBiol. Conserv.123177187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Polis, G.A., Strong, D.R. 1996Food web complexity and community dynamicsAm. Nat.147813846Google Scholar
  20. Rodwell, J.S. 1991British plant communitiesCambridge University PressCambridgeet seqGoogle Scholar
  21. Shreeve, T.G., Dennis, R.L.H., Pullin, A.S. 1996Marginality: scale determined processes and the conservation of the British butterfly faunaBiodiver. Conserv.511311141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shreeve, T.G., Dennis, R.L.H., Roy, D.B., Moss, D. 2001An ecological classification of British butterflies: ecological attributes and biotope occupancyJ. Insect Conserv.5145161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shreeve, T.G., Dennis, R.L.H., Dyck, H. 2004Resources, habitats and metapopulations – whither reality?Oikos106404408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tallis, J.H. 1991Plant Community HistoryChapman and HallLondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Thomas, J.A. 2005Monitoring change in the abundance and distribution of insects using butterflies and other indicator groupsPhil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B360339357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thomas, J.A., Bourn, N.A.D., Clarke, R.T., Stewart, K.E., Simcox, D.J., Pearman, G.S., Curtis, R., Goodger, B. 2001The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapesProc. R. Soc. Lond. B26817911796Google Scholar
  27. West, R.G. 1977Pleistocene Geology and BiologyLongmansLondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO)BrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.School of Biological and Molecular SciencesOxford Brookes UniversityHeadington, OxfordUK
  3. 3.NERC Centre for Ecology and HydrologyHuntingdonUK

Personalised recommendations