Dynamic changes in the signal-averaged electrocardiogram are associated with the long-term outcomes after ablation of ischemic ventricular tachycardia



Signal-averaged ECG (SAECG) can detect inhomogeneous myocardial conduction in patients presenting with ventricular tachycardia (VT) after myocardial infarction. Radiofrequency ablation (RFCA) aims at elimination of the endocardial late potentials and non-inducibility of VT. Previously, we demonstrated that abnormal SAECG at baseline can return to normal after a successful VT ablation. The present research investigates the post-ablation changes in SAECG after RFCA of VT and their relation to the procedural long-term outcomes.


Thirty-three patients (31 male; age 68 ± 9 years; EF 36 ± 12%) with ischemic VT were prospectively enrolled to receive RFCA. One VT (range 1–7) per patient was ablated using substrate-guided RFCA and complete success was achieved in 28 (85%) cases. SAECG was performed before (t1), immediately after (t2), and at least 6 months (t3) after the RFCA.


After RFCA, the amount of patients showing abnormal SAECG decreased from 82% initially (t1) to 57.6% post-interventionally (t2); P = 0.008; and remained unchanged thereafter in 57% (t3). Patients who experienced VT recurrence (VT+) during the follow-up period had broader averaged QRS (t2): (VT+) 150 ± 26 vs. (VT−) 129 ± 21 ms; P = 0.015, as well as longer LAS40 (t2): (VT+) 60 ± 26 vs. (VT−) 43 ± 18 ms; P = 0.03. Abnormal SAECG (t2) was a strong predictor for VT recurrence: HR 5.4; 95% CI 1.5–21. SAECG detected more late potentials in patients with inferior than in those with anterior scars: 95% vs. 58%; P = 0.016.


RFCA of VT in the left ventricle can improve an abnormal SAECG in some patients after myocardial infarction. Normal SAECG after RFCA of VT is associated with a lower risk for VT recurrence and death.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5


  1. 1.

    Simson MB. Use of signals in the terminal QRS complex to identify patients with ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1981;64(2):235–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Gomes JA, Winters SL, Stewart D, Horowitz S, Milner M, Barreca P. A new noninvasive index to predict sustained ventricular tachycardia and sudden death in the first year after myocardial infarction: based on signal-averaged electrocardiogram, radionuclide ejection fraction and Holter monitoring. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;10:349–57.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kuchar D, Thorburn C, Sammel N. Prediction of serious arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction: signal-averaged electrocardiogram, Holter monitoring and radionuclide ventriculography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;9:531–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Silberbauer J, Oloriz T, Maccabelli G, Tsiachris D, Baratto F, Vergara P, et al. Noninducibility and late potential abolition: a novel combined prognostic procedural end point for catheter ablation of postinfarction ventricular tachycardia. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:424–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Di Biase L, Santangeli P, Burkhardt DJ, Bai R, Mohanty P, Carbucicchio C, et al. Endo-epicardial homogenization of the scar versus limited substrate ablation for the treatment of electrical storms in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:132–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Gökoğlan Y, Mohanty S, Gianni C, Santangeli P, Trivedi C, Güneş MF, et al. Scar homogenization versus limited-substrate ablation in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and ventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(18):1990–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Dinov B, Bode K, Koenig S, Oebel S, Sommer P, Bollmann A, et al. Signal-averaged electrocardiography as a noninvasive tool for evaluating the outcomes after radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic heart disease: reassessment of an old tool. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9(9).

  8. 8.

    Brembilla-Perrot B, Terrier de la Chaise A, Jacquemin L, Beurrier D, Houplon P. The signal-averaged electrocardiogram is of limited value in patients with bundle branch block and dilated cardiomyopathy in predicting inducible ventricular tachycardia or death. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79(2):154–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Breithardt G, Cain ME, el-Sherif N, Flowers NC, Hombach V, Janse M, et al. Standards for analysis of ventricular late potentials using high-resolution or signal-averaged electrocardiography. A statement by a Task Force Committee of the European Society of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology. Circulation. 1991;83:1481–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Dinov B, Fiedler L, Schönbauer R, Bollmann A, Rolf S, Piorkowski C, et al. Outcomes in catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in dilated nonischemic cardiomyopathy compared with ischemic cardiomyopathy: results from the Prospective Heart Centre of Leipzig VT (HELP-VT) Study. Circulation. 2014;129:728–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Turitto G, Fontaine JM, Ursell SN, Caref EB, Henkin R, el-Sherif N, et al. Am J Cardiol. 1988;61(15):1272–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Turitto G, el-Sherif N. The signal averaged electrocardiogram and programmed stimulation in patients with complex ventricular arrhythmias. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990;13:2156–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Winters SL, Ip J, Deshmukh P, DeLuca A, Daniels K, Pe E, et al. Determinants of induction of ventricular tachycardia in nonsustained ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction and the usefulness of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. Am J Cardiol. 1993;72(17):1281–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Chow R, Hashemi J, Torbey S, Siu J, Glover B, Baranchuk AM, et al. Novel frequency analysis of signal-averaged electrocardiograms is predictive of adverse outcomes in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2019;24:e12629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Twidale N, Hazlitt HA, Berbari EJ, Beckman KJ, McClelland JH, Moulton KP, et al. Late potentials are unaffected by radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with ventricular tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994;17:157–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kuck KH, Schaumann A, Eckardt L, Willems S, Ventura R, Delacrétaz E, et al. Hansen PS; VTACH study group. Catheter ablation of stable ventricular tachycardia before defibrillator implantation in patients with coronary heart disease (VTACH): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9708):31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Sapp JL, Wells GA, Parkash R, Stevenson WG, Blier L, Sarrazin JF, et al. Ventricular tachycardia ablation versus escalation of antiarrhythmic drugs. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(2):111–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Breithardt C, Seipel L, Ostermeyer J, et al. Effects of antiarrhythmic surgery on late potentials recorded by precordial signal averaging in patients with ventricular tachycardia. Am Heart J. 1982;104:996–1003.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Liao YC, Chung FP, Lin YJ, Chang SL, Lo LW, Hu YF, et al. The application of signal average ECG in the prediction of recurrences after catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol. 2017;236:168–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ciconte C, Santinelli V, Vicedomini G, Borrelli V, Monasky M, Micaglio E, et al. Non-invasive assessment of the arrhythmogenic substrate in Brugada syndrome using signal-averaged electrocardiogram: clinical implications from a prospective clinical trial. Europace. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euz295.

  21. 21.

    Dailey SM, Kay GN, Epstein AE, Plumb VJ. Modification of late potentials by intracoronary ethanol infusion. PACE. 1992;15:1646–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Gomes JA, Winters SL, Martinson M, Mochec J, Stewart G, Jargoriski A. The prognostic significance of quantitative signalaveraged variables relative to clinical variables, site of myocardial infarction, ejection fraction and ventricular premature beats: a prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;13:377–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Schramm.

Ethics declarations

The protocol of the study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institutional review board. All patients signed an informed consent for the study and for ablation.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Dr. B. Dinov and L. Schramm share first authorship

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dinov, B., Schramm, L., Koenig, S. et al. Dynamic changes in the signal-averaged electrocardiogram are associated with the long-term outcomes after ablation of ischemic ventricular tachycardia. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 60, 125–134 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00708-y

Download citation


  • Ventricular tachycardia
  • Signal-averaged ECG
  • Catheter ablation
  • Late potentials
  • Long-term follow-up
  • Ischemic heart disease