Advertisement

Acute pericarditis following second-generation cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation

  • Giacomo Mugnai
  • Carlo de Asmundis
  • Saverio Iacopino
  • Erwin Ströker
  • Massimo Longobardi
  • Maria Claudia Negro
  • Valentina De Regibus
  • Hugo Enrique Coutino-Moreno
  • Ken Takarada
  • Rajin Choudhury
  • Juan Pablo Abugattas de Torres
  • Cesare Storti
  • Pedro Brugada
  • Gian-Battista Chierchia
Article
  • 151 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Acute pericarditis is a minor complication following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures. The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence and clinical aspects of pericarditis following cryoballoon (CB) ablation of AF investigating a possible association with procedural characteristics and a possible relationship with post-ablation recurrences.

Methods

Four hundred fifty consecutive patients (male 73%, age 59.9 ± 11.2 years) with drug-resistant paroxysmal AF who underwent CB ablation as index procedure were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were any contraindication for the procedure including the presence of intracavitary thrombus and uncontrolled heart failure and contraindications to general anesthesia.

Results

Acute pericarditis following CB ablation occurred in 18 patients (4%) of our study population. Pericardial effusion occurred in 14 patients (78%) and was mild/moderate. The total number of cryoapplications and the total freeze duration were significantly higher in patients with pericarditis compared with those without (respectively, p = 0.0006 and p = 0.01). Specifically, the number of applications and freeze duration in right inferior pulmonary vein were found significantly higher in patients with pericarditis (p = 0.007). The recurrence rate did not significantly differ between the two study groups (respectively, 16.7 vs 18.1%; p = 0.9).

Conclusions

The incidence of acute pericarditis following CB ablation in our study population accounted for 4% and was associated with both total freezing time and number of cryoapplications. The clinical course was favorable in all these patients and the occurrence of acute pericarditis did not affect the outcome during the follow-up period.

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation Cryoballoon Pericarditis Ablation Pulmonary vein isolation 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

The protocol was carried out in accordance with the ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects established by the Declaration of Helsinki protecting the privacy of all participants as well as the confidentiality of their personal information. The study was approved by the ethics committee.

Conflicts of interest

GBC and CdA receive compensation for teaching purposes and proctoring from AF solutions, Medtronic. PB receives research grants on behalf of the center from Biotronik, Medtronic, St. Jude Medical, Sorin, and Boston Scientific and speaker’s fees from Biosense-Webster, Biotronik, and Medtronic. CdA is consultant for Daiichi Sankyo. GM received an educational grant from Medtronic for Postgraduate in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing academic course.

References

  1. 1.
    Lee G, Sanders P, Kalman JM. Catheter ablation of atrial arrhythmias: state of the art. Lancet. 2012;380:1509–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kuck KH, Brugada J, Fürnkranz A, Metzner A, Ouyang F, Chun KR, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2235–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garg J, Chaudhary R, Palaniswamy C, Shah N, Krishnamoorthy P, Bozorgnia B, et al. Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of 16 clinical trials. J Atr Fibrillation. 2016;9(3):1429.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fürnkranz A, Bordignon S, Dugo D, Perotta L, Gunawardene M, Schulte-Hahn B, et al. Improved 1-year clinical success rate of pulmonary vein isolation with the second-generation cryoballoon in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25:840–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Metzner A, Reissmann B, Rausch P, Mathew S, Wohlmuth P, Tilz R, et al. One-year clinical outcome after pulmonary vein isolation using the second-generation 28-mm cryoballoon. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:288–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mugnai G, de Asmundis C, Iacopino S, Stroker E, Longobardi M, De Regibus V, et al. Comparison of the incidences of complications after second-generation cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation using vitamin K antagonists versus novel oral anticoagulants. Am J Cardiol. 2017;120:223–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mugnai G, de Asmundis C, Ciconte G, Irfan G, Saitoh Y, Velagic V, et al. Incidence and characteristics of complications in the setting of second-generation cryoballoon ablation: a large single-center study of 500 consecutive patients. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:1476–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Adler Y, Charron P, Imazio M, Badano L, Barón-Esquivias G, Bogaert J, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Endorsed by: the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2015;36:2921–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chierchia GB, Capulzini L, Droogmans S, Sorgente A, Sarkozy A, Müller-Burri A, et al. Pericardial effusion in atrial fibrillation ablation: a comparison between cryoballoon and radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation. Europace. 2010;12:337–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schaer BA, Maurer A, Sticherling C, Buser PT, Osswald S. Routine echocardiography after radiofrequency ablation: to flog a dead horse? Europace. 2009;11:155–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cappato R, Calkins H, Chen SA, Davies W, Iesaka Y, Kalman J, et al. Delayed cardiac tamponade after radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a worldwide report. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:2696–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goossens K, Caenepeel A, De Greef Y. Delayed tamponade triggering Dressler’s syndrome after pulmonary vein isolation. Acta Cardiol. 2012;67:595–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Torihashi S, Shiraishi H, Hamaoka T, Imai M, Kuroyanagi A, Nakanishi N, et al. Two cases of delayed cardiac tamponade due to pericarditis after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for atrial fibrillation. Intern Med. 2015;54:791–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giacomo Mugnai
    • 1
    • 2
  • Carlo de Asmundis
    • 1
  • Saverio Iacopino
    • 3
  • Erwin Ströker
    • 1
  • Massimo Longobardi
    • 2
  • Maria Claudia Negro
    • 2
  • Valentina De Regibus
    • 1
    • 3
  • Hugo Enrique Coutino-Moreno
    • 1
  • Ken Takarada
    • 1
  • Rajin Choudhury
    • 1
  • Juan Pablo Abugattas de Torres
    • 1
  • Cesare Storti
    • 2
  • Pedro Brugada
    • 1
  • Gian-Battista Chierchia
    • 1
  1. 1.Heart Rhythm Management CenterUZ Brussel-VUBBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing UnitIstituto di Cura Città di PaviaPaviaItaly
  3. 3.Electrophysiology UnitMaria Cecilia HospitalCotignolaItaly

Personalised recommendations