Advertisement

Automated lesion annotation during pulmonary vein isolation: influence on acute isolation rates and lesion characteristics

  • Stefan Asbach
  • Corinna Lang
  • Luca Trolese
  • Christoph Bode
  • Fabienne Schluermann
Article

Abstract

Purpose

Recovery of pulmonary vein (PV) conduction is a common mechanism of atrial fibrillation recurrence after PV isolation (PVI), underscoring the need for durable lesion formation. We aimed to evaluate the utility of an automated lesion annotation algorithm (ALAA) on acute isolation rates and resulting lesion characteristics.

Methods

Fifty patients underwent PVI using a contact force (CF) sensing catheter and ALAA. Single antral circles around ipsilateral PVs were performed with ALAA-1 settings including catheter stability (range of motion ≤2 mm, duration >10 s). Target CF was 10–20 g but not part of ALAA-1 settings. If PV conduction persisted after circle completion, force over time was added to automated settings (ALAA-2). Emerging gaps were subsequently ablated, followed by re-assessment for PVI.

Results

ALAA-1 isolated 70 % of the left and 78 % of the right PVs using 756.3 ± 212.3 s (left) and 737.1 ± 145.9 s (right) of energy delivery. ALAA-2 settings identified 29 gaps in previously unisolated PVs, closure significantly increased isolation rates to 88 % of the left and 96 % of the right PVs with additional 325.4 ± 354.1 s (left) and 266.8 ± 279.5 s (right) of energy delivery (p = 0.001). Lesion characteristics significantly differed between ALAA-1 (n = 3521 lesions) and ALAA-2 (n = 3037 lesions) settings, and between isolated and non-isolated PV segments, particularly with respect to CF. Interlesion distances with ALAA-2 were significantly longer in the left superior, left superior-anterior, and right superior-posterior segments when compared to ALAA-1.

Conclusions

Settings of an ALAA affect lesion characteristics reveal areas of insufficient lesion formation and influence acute effectiveness of PVI. Combination of CF and stability shows superior performance over stability alone.

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation Ablation Contact force Automated lesion annotation 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standard

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, Brugada J, Camm AJ, Chen SA, et al. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and resarch design: a report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Europace. 2012;14:528–606.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Themisoclakis S, Raviele A, China P, Pappone C, De Ponti R, Revishvili A, et al. Prospective European survey on atrial fibrillation ablation: clinical characteristics of patients and ablation strategies used in different countries. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25:1074–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Verma A, Kilicaslan F, Pisano E, Marrouche NF, Fanelli R, Brachmann J, et al. Response of atrial fibrillation to pulmonary vein antrum isolation is directly related to resumption and delay of pulmonary vein conduction. Circulation. 2005;11:627–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ouyang F, Antz M, Ernst S, Hachiya H, Mavrakis H, Deger FT, et al. Recovered pulmonary vein conduction as a dominant factor for recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias after complete circular isolation of the pulmonary veins: lessons from double Lasso technique. Circulation. 2005;111:127–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kuck KH, Reddy VY, Schmidt B, Natale A, Neuzil P, Saoudi N, et al. A novel radiofrequency ablation catheter using contact force sensing: Toccata study. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:18–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Neuzil P, Reddy VY, Kautzner J, Petru J, Wichterle D, Shah D, et al. Electrical reconnection after pulmonary vein isolation is contingent on contact force during initial treatment: results from the EFFICAS I study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6:327–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schluermann F, Krauss T, Biermann J, Hartmann M, Trolese L, Pache G, et al. In vivo contact force measurements and correlation with left atrial anatomy during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2015;17:1526–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reddy VY, Shah D, Kautzner J, Schmidt B, Saoudi N, Herrera C, et al. The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:789–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kimura M, Sasaki S, Owada S, Horiuchi D, Sasaki K, Itoh T, et al. Comparison of lesion formation between contact force-guided and non-guided circumferential pulmonary vein isolation: a prospective, randomized study. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11:984–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marijon E, Fazaa S, Narayanan K, Guy-Moyat B, Bouzeman A, Providencia R, et al. Real-time contact force sensing for pulmonary vein isolation in the setting of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: procedural and 1-year results. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;25:130–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anter E, Tschabrunn CM, Contreras-Valdes FM, Buxton AE, Josephson ME. Radiofrequency ablation annotation algorithm reduces the incidence of linear gaps and reconnection after pulmonary vein isolation. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11:783–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Biermann J, Bode C, Asbach S. Intracardiac echocardiography during catheter-based ablation of atrial fibrillation. Cardiol Res Pract. 2012;2012:921746.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yokoyama K, Nakagawa H, Shah D, Lambert H, Leo G, Aeby N, et al. Novel contact force sensor incorporated in irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter predicts lesion size and incidence of steam pop an thrombus. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2008;1:354–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thiagalingam A, D’Avila A, Foley L, Guerrero JL, Lambert H, Leo G, et al. Importance of catheter contact force during irrigated radiofrequency ablation: evaluation in a porcine ex vivo model using a force-sensing catheter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21:806–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ikeda A, Nakagawa H, Lambert H, Shah DC, Fonck E, Yulzari A, et al. Relationship between catheter contact force and radiofrequency lesion size and incidence of steam pop in the beating canine heart: electrogram amplitude, impedance, and electrode temperature are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force and lesion size. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:1174–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nakagawa H, Kautzner J, Natale A, Peichl P, Cihak R, Wichterle D, et al. Locations of high contact force during left atrial mapping in atrial fibrillation patients: electrogram amplitude and impedance are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force for ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6:746–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Andrade JG, Monir G, Pollak SJ, Khairy P, Dubuc M, Roy D, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using “contact force” ablation: the effect on dormant conduction and long-term freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation-a prospective study. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11:1919–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Natale A, Reddy VY, Monir G, Wilber DJ, Lindsay BD, McElderry HT, et al. Paroxysmal AF catheter ablation with a contact force sensing catheter. Results of the prospective, multicenter SMART-AF trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:647–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Makimoto H, Lin T, Rillig A, Metzner A, Wohlmuth P, Arya A, et al. In vivo contact force analysis and correlation with tissue impedance during left atrial mapping and catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:46–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Park C, Lehrmann H, Keyl C, Weber R, Schiebeling J, Allgeier J, et al. Mechanisms of pulmonary vein reconnection after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: the deterministic role of contact force and interlesion distance. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25:701–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cardiology and Angiology I, Heart CenterFreiburg UniversityFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations