Advertisement

Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 325–333 | Cite as

Wall thickness of the pulmonary vein-left atrial junction rather than electrical information as the major determinant of dormant conduction after contact force-guided pulmonary vein isolation

  • Kazuki Iso
  • Yasuo Okumura
  • Ichiro Watanabe
  • Koichi Nagashima
  • Kazumasa Sonoda
  • Rikitake Kogawa
  • Naoko Sasaki
  • Keiko Takahashi
  • Sayaka Kurokawa
  • Toshiko Nakai
  • Kimie Ohkubo
  • Atsushi Hirayama
Article

Abstract

Purpose

The usefulness of electrogram (EGM)-based information has been reported for assessing lesion transmurality during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, but the wall thickness of the pulmonary vein-left atrial (PV-LA) junction has not been considered. We conducted a study to evaluate the relation between PV-LA junction wall thickness and the presence of adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-provoked dormant PV conduction.

Methods

Eighteen AF patients underwent extensive encircling pulmonary vein isolation (EEPVI) with a target CF of >10 g. RF energy was delivered point-by-point at a power setting of 25–30 W for 30 s, and EGM-based information (change in filtered unipolar EGM morphology and bipolar EGM amplitude), decrease in impedance, CF, and CT-based measurement of the PV-LA junction wall thickness were characterized at sites of ATP-provoked dormant conduction.

Results

After EEPVI, ATP-induced dormant conduction was observed at 12 of the 288 PV sites (8 segments per ipsilateral PVs × 2 × 18 patients). Of the 974 ablation points, 72 were located at dormant conduction sites and were strongly associated with thickened PV-LA junction walls (1.02± 0.23 vs. 0.86 ± 0.26 mm, p < 0.0001) and decreased impedance (13.3 ± 6.4 vs. 14.9 ± 7.1 Ω, p = 0.0498) but not with EGM-based information or CF. Multivariate analysis identified the thickened PV-LA junction wall as the strongest predictor of dormant conduction.

Conclusions

A thickened PV-LA junction wall is a robust predictor of ATP-provoked dormant conduction; EGM-based information appears to be insufficient for ensuring adequate lesions during CF-guided EEPVI.

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation Pulmonary vein isolation Wall thickness of the pulmonary vein-left atrial junction Electrogram-based information 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ms. Wendy Alexander-Adams and Mr. George Powell for their encouragement and assistance with the reporting of our findings in English.

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding sources

The study was supported by departmental resources only.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Lee G, Sanders P, Kalman JM. Catheter ablation of atrial arrhythmias: state of the art. Lancet. 2012;380:1509–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gerstenfeld EP, Callans DJ, Dixit S, Zado E, Marchlinski FE. Incidence and location of focal atrial fibrillation triggers in patients undergoing repeat pulmonary vein isolation: implications for ablation strategies. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003;14:685–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ouyang F, Antz M, Ernst S, Hachiya H, Mavrakis H, Deger FT, et al. Recovered pulmonary vein conduction as a dominant factor for recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias after complete circular isolation of the pulmonary veins: lessons from double Lasso technique. Circulation. 2005;111:127–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Verma A, Kilicaslan F, Pisano E, Marrouche NF, Fanelli R, Brachmann J, et al. Response of atrial fibrillation to pulmonary vein antrum isolation is directly related to resumption and delay of pulmonary vein conduction. Circulation. 2005;112:627–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Willems S, Steven D, Servatius H, Hoffmann BA, Drewitz I, Müllerleile K, et al. Persistence of pulmonary vein isolation after robotic remote-navigated ablation for atrial fibrillation and its relation to clinical outcome. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21:1079–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arentz T, Macle L, Kalusche D, Hocini M, Jais P, Shah D, et al. “Dormant” pulmonary vein conduction revealed by adenosine after ostial radiofrequency catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004;15:1041–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Otomo K, Uno K, Fujiwara H, Isobe M, Iesaka Y. Local unipolar and bipolar electrogram criteria for evaluating the transmurality of atrial ablation lesions at different catheter orientations relative to the endocardial surface. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7:1291–300.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gepstein L, Hayam G, Shpun S, Cohen D, Ben-Haim SA. Atrial linear ablations in pigs. Chronic effects on atrial electrophysiology and pathology. Circulation. 1999;100:419–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Azegami K, Satake S, Okishige K, Sasano T, Ohira H, Yamashita K. Monitoring the local electrogram at the ablation site during radiofrequency application for common atrial flutter. Jpn Circ J. 1998;62:559–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ikeda A, Nakagawa H, Lambert H, Shah DC, Fonck E, Yulzari A, et al. Relationship between catheter contact force and radiofrequency lesion size and incidence of steam pop in the beating canine heart: electrogram amplitude, impedance, and electrode temperature are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force and lesion size. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:1174–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reichlin T, Lane C, Nagashima K, Nof E, Chopra N, Ng J, et al. Feasibility, efficacy, and safety of radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation guided by monitoring of the initial impedance decrease as a surrogate of catheter contact. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26:390–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reddy VY, Shah D, Kautzner J, Schmidt B, Saoudi N, Herrera C, et al. The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:1789–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Neuzil P, Reddy VY, Kautzner J, Petru J, Wichterle D, Shah D, et al. Electrical reconnection after pulmonary vein isolation is contingent on contact force during initial treatment: results from the EFFICAS I study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6:327–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Takahashi K, Okumura Y, Watanabe I, Nagashima K, Sonoda K, Sasaki N, et al. Relation between left atrial wall thickness in patients with atrial fibrillation and intracardiac electrogram characteristics and ATP-provoked dormant pulmonary vein conduction. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26:597–605.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Matsuo S, Yamane T, Date T, Inada K, Kanzaki Y, Tokuda M, et al. Reduction of AF recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation by eliminating ATP-induced transient venous re-conduction. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18:704–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kumagai K, Naito S, Nakamura K, Hayashi T, Fukazawa R, Sato C, et al. ATP-induced dormant pulmonary veins originating from the carina region after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21:494–500.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hachiya H, Hirao K, Takahashi A, Nagata Y, Suzuki K, Maeda S, et al. Clinical implications of reconnection between the left atrium and isolated pulmonary veins provoked by adenosine triphosphate after extensive encircling pulmonary vein isolation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18:392–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Okumura Y, Watanabe I, Nagashima K, Sonoda K, Mano H, Sasaki N, et al. The effects of standard electrical PV isolation vs. “pace and ablate” on ATP-provoked PV reconnections. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014;40:39–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Macle L, Khairy P, Weerasooriya R, Novak P, Verma A, Willems S, et al. ADVICE trial investigators: adenosine-guided pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: an international, multicentre, randomised superiority trial. Lancet. 2015;386:672–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kobori A, Shizuta S, Inoue K, Kaitani K, Morimoto T, Nakazawa Y, et al. 0055NDER-ATP Trial Investigators: adenosine triphosphate-guided pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: the unmasking dormant electrical reconduction by adenosine triphosphate (UNDER-ATP) trial. Eur Heart J. 2015.pii, ehv457. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ghanbari H, Jani R, Hussain-Amin A, Al-Assad W, Huether E, Ansari S, et al. Role of adenosine after antral pulmonary vein isolation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. Heart Rhythm. 2015.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Andrade JG, Monir G, Pollak SJ, Khairy P, Dubuc M, Roy D, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using “contact force” ablation: the effect on dormant conduction and long-term freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation—a prospective study. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11:1919–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schwartzman D, Michele JJ, Trankiem CT, Ren JF. Electrogram-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial tissue comparison with thermometry-guide ablation: comparison with thermometry-guide ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2001;5:253–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    le Polain deWaroux JB, Weerasooriya R, Anvardeen K, Barbraud C, Marchandise S, De Meester C, et al. Low contact force and force-time integral predict early recovery and dormant conduction revealed by adenosine after pulmonary vein isolation. Europace. 2015;17:877–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Haldar S, Jarman JW, Panikker S, Jones DG, Salukhe T, Gupta D, et al. Contact force sensing technology identifies sites of inadequate contact and reduces acute pulmonary vein reconnection: a prospective case control study. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:1160–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sotomi Y, Kikkawa T, Inoue K, Tanaka K, Toyoshima Y, Oka T, et al. Regional difference of optimal contact force to prevent acute pulmonary vein reconnection during radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25:941–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kazuki Iso
    • 1
  • Yasuo Okumura
    • 1
  • Ichiro Watanabe
    • 1
  • Koichi Nagashima
    • 1
  • Kazumasa Sonoda
    • 1
  • Rikitake Kogawa
    • 1
  • Naoko Sasaki
    • 1
  • Keiko Takahashi
    • 1
  • Sayaka Kurokawa
    • 1
  • Toshiko Nakai
    • 1
  • Kimie Ohkubo
    • 1
  • Atsushi Hirayama
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Cardiology, Department of MedicineNihon University School of MedicineItabashi-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations