Advertisement

Open-irrigated laser catheter ablation: influence of catheter–tissue contact force on lesion formation

  • Michaela Sagerer-Gerhardt
  • Helmut P. Weber
Article

Abstract

Purpose

Catheter–tissue contact force (CF) is a major determinant for radiofrequency (RF) ablation lesion size and quality. We sought to test the influence of catheter CF on lesion formation by using an open-irrigated electrode-laser mapping and ablation (ELMA) catheter.

Methods

With the ELMA catheter in a stable vertical position, continuous wave 1064 nm laser impacts at 15 W (9.5 W/mm2), 30 s (285 J/mm2), irrigation flow 30 mL/min, were aimed at the endocardial surface of bovine myocardium in heparinized stagnant blood (ACT >350 s) at room temperature (18 °C). Lesions were produced with CFs of 100 g, 10 g, in contact but without pressure, with the catheter tip 2.0 mm, and 5.0 mm away (n = 10, each). Lesions were evaluated morphometrically and were compared by the unpaired t tests.

Results

There were no significant differences between volumes of lesions achieved with catheter–tissue CF of 100 g, 10 g, and in contact without pressure: 297 ± 56.0 vs. 300 ± 39 vs. 320 ± 24, respectively (p > 0.05). However, volumes of lesions produced at a distance of 2 mm (95 ± 14 mm3) were significantly smaller (p < 0.0001), whereas at a distance of 5.0 mm, no lesions were produced. No steam-pop with crater or thrombus formation occurred.

Conclusions

By using an open-irrigated ELMA catheter, catheter–tissue CF is not a determinant for laser ablation lesion size and quality. Maximum sizes of lesions can be achieved with the catheter in intimate endocardial contact without pressure. However, lesions can be produced also at a catheter–tissue distance of 2.0 mm. Noticeably, there is no thrombus formation during laser application with the free floating ELMA catheter in the stagnant blood.

Keywords

Catheter ablation Catheter–tissue contact force Laser Open-irrigated laser catheter 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by the LasCor GmbH, Laser—Medical Devices, Taufkirchen, and Manufacturer of the open-irrigated ELMA catheter RytmoLas. Dr. M. Sagerer-Gerhardt is CTO and Dr. H. Weber is CEO of the LasCor Company, without any financial benefit from the company. Both the authors have full control of all primary data and both agree to allow the journal to review their data if requested.

References

  1. 1.
    Okumura, Y., Johnson, S. B., Bunch, T. J., Henz, B. D., O'Brien, C. J., & Packer, D. L. (2008). A systematical analysis of in vivo contact force on virtual catheter tip/tissue surface contact during cardiac mapping and intervention. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 19, 632–640.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shah, D. C., Lambert, H., Nakagawa, H., Langenkamp, A., Aeby, N., & Leo, G. (2010). Area under the real-time contact force curve (force-time integral) predicts radiofrequency lesion size in an in vitro contractile model. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 21, 1038–1043.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sacher, F., Wright, M., Derval, N., Denis, A., Ramoul, K., Roten, L., et al. (2013). Endocardial versus epicardial ventricular radiofrequency ablation. Utility of in vivo contact force assessment. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 6, 144–150.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yokoyama, K., Nakagawa, H., Shah, D. C., Lambert, H., Leo, G., Aeby, N., et al. (2008). Novel contact force sensor incorporated in irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter predicts lesion size and incidence of steam pop and thrombus. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 1, 354–362.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Di Biase, L., Natale, A., Barrett, C., Tan, C., Elayi, C. S., Ching, C. K., et al. (2009). Relationship between catheter force, lesion characteristics, “Poping”, and char formation: experience with robotic navigation system. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 20, 436–440.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kumar, S., Morton, J. B., Lee, J., Halloran, K., Spence, S. J., Gorelik, A., et al. (2012). Prospective characterization of catheter-tissue contact force at different anatomic sites during antral pulmonary vein isolation. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 5, 1124–1129.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reddy, V. Y., Shah, D., Kautzner, J., Schmidt, B., Saoudi, N., Herrera, C., et al. (2012). The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study. Heart Rhythm, 9(11), 1789–1795.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Neuzil, P., Reddy, V. Y., Kautzner, J., Petru, J., Wichterle, D., Shah, D., et al. (2013). Electrical reconnections after pulmonary vein isolation is contingent on contact force during initial treatment. Results from the EFFICAS I Study. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 6, 327–333.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nakagawa, H., Kautzner, J., Natale, A., Peichl, P., Cihak, R., Wichterle, D., et al. (2013). Locations of high contact force during left atrial mapping in atrial fibrillation patients. Electrogram amplitude and impedance are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force for ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 6, 746–753.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tilz, R. R., Makimoto, H., Lin, T., Rilling, A., Metzner, A., Mathew, S., et al. (2014). In vivo left-ventricular contact force analysis: comparison of antegrade transseptal with retrograde transaortic mapping strategies and correlation of impedance and electrical amplitude with contact force. Europace, 16, 1387–1395.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weber, H., & Sagerer-Gerhardt, M. (2013). Open-irrigated laser catheter ablation produces flow dependent sizes of lesions. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 36, 1132–1137.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weber, H., & Sagerer-Gerhardt, M. (2014). Open-irrigated laser catheter ablation: influence of catheter irrigation and of contact and noncontact mode of laser application on lesion formation in bovine myocardium. Lasers in Medical Science, 29, 1183–1187.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weber, H., Heinze, A., Enders, S., Hauptmann, G., Ruprecht, L., & Unsoeld, E. (1997). In vivo temperature measurement during transcatheter endomyocardial Nd:YAG laser irradiation. Lasers in Medical Science, 12, 352–356.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fisher, J. C. (1993). Photons, physiatrics, and physicians: a practical guide to understanding interaction of laser light with living tissue: Part II: basic mechanisms of tissue destruction by laser beams. Journal of Clinical Laser Medicine and Surgery, 11, 291–303.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Knappe, V., Frank, F., & Rhode, E. (2001). Principles of lasers and biophotonic effects. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, 22, 411–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boulnois, J.-L. (1986). Photophysical processes in recent medical laser developments: a review. Lasers in Medical Science, 1, 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bruneval, P., Mesnildrey, P., & Camilleri, P. (1987). Nd:YAG laser induced injury in dog myocardium: optical and ultrastructural study of early lesions. European Heart Journal, 8, 785–792.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    He, D. S. H., Sharma, P., Wang, H. Z., Bosnos, M., & Marcus, F. I. (1999). Bio-battery signal predicts myocardial lesion formation and depth in vivo. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 1, 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Haines, D. (2004). Biophysics of ablation: application to technology. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophsiology, 15, S2–S11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Soejima, K., Stevenson, W. G., Sapp, J. L., Selwyn, A. P., Couper, G., & Epstein, L. M. (2004). Endocardial and epicardial radiofrequency ablation of ventricular tachycardia associated with dilated cardiomyopathy: the importance of low-voltage scars. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 43, 1834–1842.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maury, P., Leoabon, B., Duparc, A., Delay, M., & Galiner, M. (2007). Epicardial catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia using surgical subxyphoid approach. Europace, 9, 212–215.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Garcia, F. C., Bazan, V., Zado, E. S., Ren, J. F., & Marchlinski, F. E. (2009). Epicardial substrate and outcome with epicardial ablation of ventricular tachycardia in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia. Circulation, 120, 366–375.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kosmidou, I., Inada, K., Seiler, J., Koplan, B., Stevenson, W. G., & Tedrow, U. B. (2011). Role of repeat procedures for catheter ablation of postinfarction ventricular tachycardia. Heart Rhythm, 8, 1516–1522.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dagres, N., Cantu, F., Geelen, P., Lewalter, T., Proclemer, A., & Blomstrom-Lundqvist, C. (2012). Current practice of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Europace, 14, 135–137.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vergara, P., Maisano, F., Maccabelli, G., & Della Bella, P. (2013). Radiofrequency and cryoenergy endo-epicardial catheter and surgical approach for a case of incessant ventricular tachycardia ablation. Europace, 15, 540.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Perna, F., Heist, E. K., Danik, S. B., Barett, C. D., Ruskin, J. N., & Mansour, M. (2011). Assessment of catheter tip contact force resulting in cardiac perforation in swine atria using sensing technology. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 4, 218–224.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Makimoto, H., Lin, T., Rillig, A., Metzner, A., Wohlmuth, P., Arya, A., et al. (2014). In vivo contact force analysis and correlation with tissue impedance during left atrial mapping and catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 7, 46–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nakagawa, H., Kautzner, J., Natale, A., Peichl, P., Cihak, R., & Wichterle, D. (2013). Location of high contact force during left atrial mapping in atrial fibrillation patients. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 6, 746–753.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang, P. J., Homoud, M. K., Link, M. S., & Estes, M. (1999). Alternative energy sources for catheter ablation. Current Cardiology Reports, 1, 165–171.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Weber, H., & Sagerer-Gerhardt, M. (2014). Open-irrigated laser catheter ablation: relationship between the level of energy, myocardial thickness, and collateral damages in a dog model. Europace, 16, 142–148.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Weber, H., & Sagerer-Gerhardt, M. (2014). Electrocardiographic monitoring of myocardial lesion formation during laser catheter ablation in a dog model. Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management , 5, 1641–1649.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Weber, H., & Sagerer-Gerhardt, M. (2015). Monitoring of laser effects on the conduction system by using an open-irrigated electrode-laser mapping and ablation catheter; laser catheter mapping. Europace.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnesthesiologyHospital Neuperlach, Teaching Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilian-University of MunichMunichGermany
  2. 2.CCEP Center Taufkirchen, Section Research, Development and EducationTaufkirchenGermany

Personalised recommendations