Advertisement

Impact of hybrid procedure on P wave duration for atrial fibrillation ablation

  • Narendra Kumar
  • Pietro Bonizzi
  • Laurent Pison
  • Kevin Phan
  • Theo Lankveld
  • Bart Maessen
  • Mark La Meir
  • Sandro Gelsomino
  • Jos Maessen
  • Harry Crijns
Article

Abstract

Aim

Hybrid procedure (HP) involves epicardial isolation of pulmonary vein and posterior wall of left atrium, and endocardial checking of lesions and touchups (if needed). We aimed at observing the effect of hybrid procedure on P wave duration (PWD), calculated automatically from surface ECG leads at start and end of HP, and also for relationship to atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence at 9 months.

Methods

Forty-one patients (32 male; mean age, 58.4 ± 9.5 years) underwent HP, as first ever ablation. A new automated method was used for P wave segmentation and PWD estimation from recognizable P waves in ECG lead I or II before and after HP, based on fitting of each P wave by means of two Gaussian functions.

Results

Overall, PWD was significantly decreased after procedure (104.4 ± 25.1 ms vs. 84.7 ± 23.8 ms, p = 0.0151), especially in persistent AF patients (122.4 ± 32.2 ms vs. 85.6 ± 24.5 ms, p = 0.02). PWD preprocedure was significantly higher in persistent than in paroxysmal patients (122.4 ± 32.2 ms vs. 92.5 ± 17.9 ms, p = 0.0383). PWD was significantly decreased after procedure in prior electrical cardioverted patients (106.7 ± 30.5 ms vs. 84.7 ± 23.1 ms, p = 0.0353). After 9-month follow-up of 40 patients, HP-induced PWD decrease was significant for the 12 persistent patients without recurrence (122.4.1 ± 35.3 ms vs. 85.6 ± 22.0 ms, p = 0.0210).

Conclusion

Preprocedure PWD was higher for persistent than paroxysmal patients. HP reduced PWD significantly. Nine-month follow-up suggests that HP is successful in restoring and maintaining sinus rhythm. To individualize AF therapy, AF type-based selection of patients may be possible before procedure. Automated analysis of PWD from surface ECG is possible.

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation Electrocardiography Hybrid procedure P wave duration Radiofrequency Surgical ablation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Suzanne Philippens (RN) for helping us in retrieving clinical follow-up data.

Conflict of interest

Mark La Meir and Laurent Pison are consultants to Atricure.

References

  1. 1.
    Go, A. S., Hylek, E. M., Phillips, K. A., Chang, Y., Henault, L. E., Selby, J. V., et al. (2001). Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults. JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(18), 2370–2375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lin, H. J., Wolf, P. A., Kelly-Hayes, M., Beiser, A. S., Kase, C. S., Benjamin, E. J., et al. (1996). Stroke severity in atrial fibrillation. The Framingham Study. Stroke, 27(10), 1760–1764.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jais, P., Cauchemez, B., Macle, L., Daoud, E., Khairy, P., Subbiah, R., et al. (2008). Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation: The A4 study. Circulation, 118(24), 2498–2505.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Calkins, H., Kuck, K. H., Cappato, R., Brugada, J., Camm, A. J., Chen, S. A., et al. (2012). 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 33(2), 171–257.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pison, L., La Meir, M., van Opstal, J., Blaauw, Y., Maessen, J., & Crijns, H. J. (2012). Hybrid thoracoscopic surgical and transvenous catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 60(1), 54–61.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    La Meir, M., Gelsomino, S., Luca, F., Lorusso, R., Gensini, G. F., Pison, L., et al. (2012). Minimally invasive thoracoscopic hybrid treatment of lone atrial fibrillation: Early results of monopolar versus bipolar radiofrequency source. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 14(4), 445–450.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blanche, C., Tran, N., Rigamonti, F., Burri, H., & Zimmermann, M. (2013). Value of P-wave signal averaging to predict atrial fibrillation recurrences after pulmonary vein isolation. Europace, 15(2), 198–204.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Caldwell, J., Koppikar, S., Barake, W., Redfearn, D., Michael, K., Simpson, C., et al. (2013). Prolonged P-wave duration is associated with atrial fibrillation recurrence after successful pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ogawa, M., Kumagai, K., Vakulenko, M., Yasuda, T., Siegerman, C., Garfinkel, A., et al. (2007). Reduction of P-wave duration and successful pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 18(9), 931–938.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bunch, T. J., & Day, J. D. (2011). Achieving favorable very long-term outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: An exciting adventure or delusional quest? Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 22(11), 1215–1216.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kumar, N., Pison, L., la Meir, M., & Maessen, J. (2013). Direct visualization of pulmonary vein stenosis after previous catheter ablation. Heart Rhythm.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kumar, N., Pison, L., La Meir, M., Maessen, J., & Crijns, H. J. (2014). Hybrid approach to atrial fibrillation ablation using bipolar radiofrequency devices epicardially and cryoballoon endocardially. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Censi, F., Calcagnini, G., Ricci, C., Ricci, R. P., Santini, M., Grammatico, A., et al. (2007). P-wave morphology assessment by a gaussian functions-based model in atrial fibrillation patients. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 54(4), 663–672.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Corino, V. D., Chouvarda, I., Maglaveras, N., & Mainardi, L. T. (2010).A beat-to-beat P wave analysis in healthy population. In Computing in Cardiology, 2010, (pp. 553-556). IEEE.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pan, J., & Tompkins, W. J. (1985). A real-time QRS detection algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 32(3), 230–236.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van Beeumen, K., Houben, R., Tavernier, R., Ketels, S., & Duytschaever, M. (2010). Changes in P-wave area and P-wave duration after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation. Europace, 12(6), 798–804.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Okumura, Y., Watanabe, I., Ohkubo, K., Ashino, S., Kofune, M., Hashimoto, K., et al. (2007). Prediction of the efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation by the signal-averaged P-wave duration. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 30(3), 304–313.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Budeus, M., Hennersdorf, M., Perings, C., & Strauer, B. E. (2004). The prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after electrical cardioversion with P wave signal averaged EKG. Zeitschrift für Kardiologie, 93(6), 474–478.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Meir, M. L. (2014). Surgical options for treatment of atrial fibrillation. Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 3(1), 30–37.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kumar, N., Phan, K., Pison, L., & Maessen, J. (2014). Re: Clinical characteristics and prognostic significance of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients with atrial fibrillation: Results from a multicenter atrial fibrillation registry study. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kumar, N., Phan, K., Timmermans, C., Pison, L., Meir, M. L., Maessen, J., et al. (2014). Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: The missing links. European Heart Journal.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Redfearn, D. P., Skanes, A. C., Gula, L. J., Griffith, M. J., Marshall, H. J., Stafford, P. J., et al. (2007). Noninvasive assessment of atrial substrate change after wide area circumferential ablation: A comparison with segmental pulmonary vein isolation. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology, 12(4), 329–337.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lemery, R., Birnie, D., Tang, A. S., Green, M., Gollob, M., Hendry, M., et al. (2007). Normal atrial activation and voltage during sinus rhythm in the human heart: An endocardial and epicardial mapping study in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 18(4), 402–408.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Date, T., Yamane, T., Inada, K., Matsuo, S., Kanzaki, Y., Miyanaga, S., et al. (2007). The effects of pulmonary vein isolation on the morphology of p waves: The contribution of pulmonary vein muscle excitation to the formation of p waves. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 30(1), 93–101.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nassif, M., Krul, S. P., Driessen, A. H., Deneke, T., Wilde, A. A., de Bakker, J. M., et al. (2013). Electrocardiographic P wave changes after thoracoscopic pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 37(3), 275–282.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    de Vos, C. B., Pisters, R., Nieuwlaat, R., Prins, M. H., Tieleman, R. G., Coelen, R. J., et al. (2010). Progression from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation clinical correlates and prognosis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 55(8), 725–731.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Steinberg, B. A., Hellkamp, A. S., Lokhnygina, Y., Patel, M. R., Breithardt, G., Hankey, G. J., et al. (2014). Higher risk of death and stroke in patients with persistent vs. paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Results from the ROCKET-AF Trial. European Heart Journal.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cappato, R., Calkins, H., Chen, S. A., Davies, W., Iesaka, Y., Kalman, J., et al. (2010). Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 3(1), 32–38.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tilz, R. R., Chun, K. R., Schmidt, B., Fuernkranz, A., Wissner, E., Koester, I., et al. (2010). Catheter ablation of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: A lesson from circumferential pulmonary vein isolation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 21(10), 1085–1093.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Udyavar, A. R., Huang, S. H., Chang, S. L., Lin, Y. J., Tai, C. T., Lo, L. W., et al. (2009). Acute effect of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation on left atrial substrate. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 20(7), 715–722.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gorenek, B., Birdane, A., Kudaiberdieva, G., Goktekin, O., Cavusoglu, Y., Unalir, A., et al. (2003). P wave amplitude and duration may predict immediate recurrence of atrial fibrillation after internal cardioversion. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology, 8(3), 215–218.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Burashnikov, A., Di Diego, J. M., Sicouri, S., Ferreiro, M., Carlsson, L., & Antzelevitch, C. (2008). Atrial-selective effects of chronic amiodarone in the management of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm, 5(12), 1735–1742.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Redfearn, D. P., Lane, J., Ward, K., & Stafford, P. J. (2006). High-resolution analysis of the surface P wave as a measure of atrial electrophysiological substrate. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology, 11(1), 12–19.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dhala, A., Underwood, D., Leman, R., Madu, E., Baugh, D., Ozawa, Y., et al. (2002). Signal-averaged P-wave analysis of normal controls and patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A study in gender differences, age dependence, and reproducibility. Clinical Cardiology, 25(11), 525–531.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fukunami, M., Yamada, T., Ohmori, M., Kumagai, K., Umemoto, K., Sakai, A., et al. (1991). Detection of patients at risk for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm by P wave-triggered signal-averaged electrocardiogram. Circulation, 83(1), 162–169.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Budeus, M., Wieneke, H., Sack, S., Erbel, R., & Perings, C. (2006). Long-term outcome after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: Prediction of recurrence with P wave signal averaged ECG and chemoreflexsensitivity. International Journal of Cardiology, 112(3), 308–315.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Opolski, G., Scislo, P., Stanislawska, J., Gorecki, A., Steckiewicz, R., & Torbicki, A. (1997). Detection of patients at risk for recurrence of atrial fibrillation after successful electrical cardioversion by signal-averaged P-wave ECG. International Journal of Cardiology, 60(2), 181–185.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nakagawa, H., Aoyama, H., Beckman, K. J., Po, S. S., Wu, R., Lockwood, D., et al. (2004). Relation between pulmonary vein firing and extent of left atrial-pulmonary vein connection in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation, 109(12), 1523–1529.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Narendra Kumar
    • 1
  • Pietro Bonizzi
    • 4
  • Laurent Pison
    • 1
  • Kevin Phan
    • 5
  • Theo Lankveld
    • 3
  • Bart Maessen
    • 2
  • Mark La Meir
    • 2
  • Sandro Gelsomino
    • 2
    • 6
  • Jos Maessen
    • 2
  • Harry Crijns
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of CardiologyMaastricht University Medical Centre and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM)MaastrichtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Cardiac SurgeryMaastricht University Medical Centre and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM)MaastrichtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of PhysiologyMaastricht University Medical Centre and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM)MaastrichtThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of knowledge engineeringMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Macquarie University and Westmead Hospital, Sydney Medical SchoolUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  6. 6.Department of Heart and VesselsCareggi HospitalFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations