Advertisement

Femoral vein thrombosis after right-sided electrophysiological procedures

  • Ghassan Moubarak
  • Stéphanie Bonhomme
  • Géraldine Vedrenne
  • Claire Bouleti
  • Jacky Ollitrault
  • Pascal Priollet
  • Romain Cador
  • Serge Cazeau
Article

Abstract

Purpose

Electrophysiological studies and radiofrequency catheter ablations require single or multiple sheath placements through femoral vein cannulation. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) following such procedures.

Methods and results

We prospectively enrolled 220 consecutive patients with a median age of 70 [60–79] years. The median duration of the procedures from insertion to removal of sheaths was 45 [30–75] min. At least two sheaths were inserted in 158 (72 %) of the cases. Duplex ultrasonography evaluation of the lower leg veins was performed 6 h after the procedure and revealed common femoral vein thrombosis in 11 (5 %) patients. All thrombi were partial and none was complete. Thrombi were mobile in four patients and extended to the external iliac vein in three patients. None of the patients presented with clinical signs of DVT or pulmonary embolism. Anticoagulation was prescribed for 2–4 weeks and a follow-up duplex ultrasonography obtained in the first seven patients revealed complete resolution of thrombi in all cases. On multivariate analysis, two predictors of thrombosis occurrence were identified: a greater sum of sheath diameters (odds ratio, 1.41 [95 % confidence interval, 1.25–1.60] per 1-French increase; p < 0.001) and a longer procedural duration (odds ratio, 1.02 [95 % confidence interval, 1.00–1.04] per 1-min increase; p = 0.04).

Conclusions

Asymptomatic femoral DVT occur in 5 % of electrophysiological studies and right-heart radiofrequency catheter ablations, particularly when large sheaths are inserted for a longer period. The role of anticoagulation in this clinical setting warrants further evaluation.

Keywords

Deep vein thrombosis Duplex ultrasonography Electrophysiological study Catheter ablation 

References

  1. 1.
    Cappato, R., Calkins, H., Chen, S. A., et al. (2010). Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 3(1), 32–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oral, H., Chugh, A., Ozaydin, M., et al. (2006). Risk of thromboembolic events after percutaneous left atrial radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation, 114(8), 759–765.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Calkins, H., Kuck, K. H., Cappato, R., et al. (2012). 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 33(2), 171–257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davutoglu, V., Kervancioglu, S., Dinckal, H., et al. (2004). High incidence of occult femoral vein thrombosis related to multiple venous sheaths during electrophysiological studies. Heart, 90(9), 1061–1062.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, J. Y., Chang, K. C., Lin, Y. C., Chou, H. T., & Hung, J. S. (2004). Safety and outcomes of short-term multiple femoral venous sheath placement in cardiac electrophysiological study and radiofrequency catheter ablation. Japanese Heart Journal, 45(2), 257–264.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alizadeh, A., Yazdi, A. H., Kafi, M., Rad, M. A., Moradi, M., & Emkanjoo, Z. (2012). Predictors of local venous complications resulting from electrophysiological procedures. Cardiology Journal, 19(1), 15–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee, D. S., Dorian, P., Downar, E., et al. (2001). Thrombogenicity of radiofrequency ablation procedures: what factors influence thrombin generation? Europace, 3(3), 195–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goldhaber, S. Z., & Bounameaux, H. (2012). Pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis. Lancet, 379(9828), 1835–1846.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hindricks, G. (1993). The Multicentre European Radiofrequency Survey (MERFS): complications of radiofrequency catheter ablation of arrhythmias. The Multicentre European Radiofrequency Survey (MERFS) investigators of the Working Group on Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology. European Heart Journal, 14(12), 1644–1653.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ghassan Moubarak
    • 1
  • Stéphanie Bonhomme
    • 2
  • Géraldine Vedrenne
    • 1
  • Claire Bouleti
    • 1
  • Jacky Ollitrault
    • 1
  • Pascal Priollet
    • 2
  • Romain Cador
    • 3
  • Serge Cazeau
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pacing and Interventional ElectrophysiologyGroupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-JosephParisFrance
  2. 2.Department of Vascular MedicineGroupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-JosephParisFrance
  3. 3.Department of CardiologyGroupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-JosephParisFrance

Personalised recommendations