Skip to main content
Log in

Duration of the A(H)–A(Md) interval predicts occurrence of AV-block after radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Modification of the slow pathway (SP) of the atrio-ventricular node by radiofrequency ablation is the most effective treatment to cure AV nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT). However, this therapy may be complicated by AV-block (AVB). We sought to evaluate the predictive value of the A(H)A(Md) interval—the electrical delay between atrial signals on the His- and the ablation-catheter—upon development of AVB during SP ablation.

Methods

The associations between A(H)A(Md) interval, occurrence of ventriculo-atrial block (VAB) during junctional activity (JA) and transient or permanent AVB were analyzed retrospectively for 1585 RF applications at the SP in 393 patients diagnosed with AVNRT. The value of A(H)A(Md) was further tested prospectively in 118 AVNRT patients, who were only ablated at targets with intervals >20 ms.

Results

Forty-six RF deliveries resulted in transient or permanent AV-conduction disturbances. Shorter A(H)A(Md) intervals were associated with the occurrence of VAB during JA (p < 0.001) and AVB (p < 0.001). A(H)A(Md) was the strongest predictor for VAB or AVB in multivariate regression analyses, followed by the radiological distance between the catheters. In the prospective study, permanent high-degree AVB was not observed when the A(H)A(Md) at the ablation site was >20 ms.

Conclusion

The A(H)A(Md) interval is a better predictor for occurrence of conduction block during ablation for AVNRT than the radiological distance between the His- and the ablation-catheter. The risk of permanent AVB can be minimized, if only sites with an A(H)A(Md) longer than 20 ms are targeted for ablation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AVB:

Atrioventricular conduction block

CL:

Cycle length

CS:

Coronary sinus

EGM:

Electrocardiogram

FP:

Fast pathway

JA:

Junctional activity, i.e., junctional ectopy

RF:

Radiofrequency

SP:

Slow pathway

VAB:

Ventriculo-atrial conduction block

XR:

Radiological distance between the His- and the ablation catheter on fluoroscopy

References

  1. Blomstrom-Lundqvist, C., Scheinman, M. M., Aliot, E. M., Alpert, J. S., Calkins, H., Camm, A. J., et al. (2003). ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias–executive summary. a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines and the European society of cardiology committee for practice guidelines (writing committee to develop guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias) developed in collaboration with NASPE-Heart Rhythm Society. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 42(8), 1493–1531.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cosio, F. G., Anderson, R. H., Kuck, K. H., Becker, A., Borggrefe, M., Campbell, R. W., et al. (1999). Living anatomy of the atrioventricular junctions. A guide to electrophysiologic mapping. a consensus statement from the cardiac nomenclature study group, working group of arrhythmias, European society of cardiology, and the task force on cardiac nomenclature from NASPE. Circulation, 100(5), e31–37.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Keim, S., Werner, P., Jazayeri, M., Akhtar, M., & Tchou, P. (1992). Localization of the fast and slow pathways in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia by intraoperative ice mapping. Circulation, 86(3), 919–925.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sung, R. J., Waxman, H. L., Saksena, S., & Juma, Z. (1981). Sequence of retrograde atrial activation in patients with dual atrioventricular nodal pathways. Circulation, 64(5), 1059–1067.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jackman, W. M., Beckman, K. J., McClelland, J. H., Wang, X., Friday, K. J., Roman, C. A., et al. (1992). Treatment of supraventricular tachycardia due to atrioventricular nodal reentry, by radiofrequency catheter ablation of slow-pathway conduction. The New England Journal of Medicine, 327(5), 313–318.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalbfleisch, S. J., Strickberger, S. A., Williamson, B., Vorperian, V. R., Man, C., Hummel, J. D., et al. (1994). Randomized comparison of anatomic and electrogram mapping approaches to ablation of the slow pathway of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 23(3), 716–723.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Calkins, H., Yong, P., Miller, J. M., Olshansky, B., Carlson, M., Saul, J. P., et al. (1999). Catheter ablation of accessory pathways, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, and the atrioventricular junction: final results of a prospective, multicenter clinical trial. The Atakr Multicenter Investigators Group. Circulation, 99(2), 262–270.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Delise, P., Sitta, N., Zoppo, F., Coro, L., Verlato, R., Mantovan, R., et al. (2002). Radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: the risk of intraprocedural, late and long-term atrioventricular block. The Veneto Region multicenter experience. Ital Heart J, 3(12), 715–720.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clague, J. R., Dagres, N., Kottkamp, H., Breithardt, G., & Borggrefe, M. (2001). Targeting the slow pathway for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: initial results and long-term follow-up in 379 consecutive patients. European Heart Journal, 22(1), 82–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Thakur, R. K., Klein, G. J., Yee, R., & Stites, H. W. (1993). Junctional tachycardia: a useful marker during radiofrequency ablation for atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 22(6), 1706–1710.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lipscomb, K. J., Zaidi, A. M., Fitzpatrick, A. P., & Lefroy, D. (2001). Slow pathway modification for atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia: fast junctional tachycardia predicts adverse prognosis. Heart, 85(1), 44–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zrenner, B., Dong, J., Schreieck, J., Deisenhofer, I., Estner, H., Luani, B., et al. (2004). Transvenous cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway for the treatment of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia: a prospective randomized pilot study. European Heart Journal, 25(24), 2226–2231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hintringer, F., Hartikainen, J., Davies, D. W., Heald, S. C., Gill, J. S., Ward, D. E., et al. (1995). Prediction of atrioventricular block during radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway of the atrioventricular node. Circulation, 92(12), 3490–3496.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Heidbuchel, H., & Jackman, W. M. (2004). Characterization of subforms of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Europace, 6(4), 316–329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stuhlinger, M., Steinwender, C., Schnoll, F., Winter, S., Freihoff, F., & Wurtz, S. (2008). GOLDART--Gold alloy versus platinum-iridium electrode for ablation of AVNRT. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol., 19(3), 242–246. Epub 2007 Dec 2012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jentzer, J. H., Goyal, R., Williamson, B. D., Man, K. C., Niebauer, M., Daoud, E., et al. (1994). Analysis of junctional ectopy during radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Circulation, 90(6), 2820–2826.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kammeraad, J., Udink ten Cate, F., Simmers, T., Emmel, M., Wittkampf, F. H., & Sreeram, N. (2004). Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children aided by the LocaLisa mapping system. Europace, 6(3), 209–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pandozi, C., Ficili, S., Galeazzi, M., Lavalle, C., Russo, M., Pandozi, A., et al. (2011). Propagation of the Sinus Impulse into the Koch's Triangle and Localization, Timing and Origin of the Multicomponent Potentials Recorded in this Area. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 4, 125–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Delise, P., Bonso, A., Coro, L., Fantinel, M., Gasparini, G., Themistoclakis, S., et al. (2001). Pacemapping of the triangle of Koch: a simple method to reduce the risk of atrioventricular block during radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 24(12), 1725–1731.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Boulos, M., Hoch, D., Schecter, S., Greenberg, S., & Levine, J. (1998). Age dependence of complete heart block complicating radiofrequency ablation of the atrioventricular nodal slow pathway. The American Journal of Cardiology, 82(3), 390–391.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from the “Jubiläumsfonds” from the Austrian National Bank (project # 11183).

Conflict of interest

None for any of the authors

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus C. Stühlinger.

Additional information

Markus C. Stühlinger and Kakhaber Etsadashvili contributed equally to the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stühlinger, M.C., Etsadashvili, K., Stühlinger, X. et al. Duration of the A(H)–A(Md) interval predicts occurrence of AV-block after radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 31, 207–215 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-011-9578-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-011-9578-9

Keywords

Navigation