Coronary microcatheter mapping of coronary arteries during radiofrequency ablation in children




Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is a safe and effective treatment option for children with refractory supraventricular tachycardias. RFCA of right-sided accessory pathways (APs) continues to be challenging, resulting in lower success rates and higher recurrence rates. One of the reasons for a prolonged or failed procedure is mapping error and changes in cardiac anatomy. The right coronary artery (RCA) runs along the ventricular aspect of the right epicardial atrioventricular groove, and RCA mapping had been reported facilitating difficult right-sided AP RFCA in the pediatric population. We reported that microcatheter-assisted mapping during RFCA can improve localization of right-sided and some left-sided APs particularly in children with congenital heart disease.


This technique was used in seven patients with a mean age of 15.3 ± 1.6 years and a mean weight of 52.6 ± 6.5 kg. Five patients (71%) had manifest preexcitation on surface electrocardiogram, and two patients had a concealed AP. In two of them, there were single ventricle anatomies. In the other two patients, venous access problem to the heart and enormous cardiac hypertrophy were the major problems. In the remaining three patients with normal cardiac anatomy, RCA mapping was used because a standard procedure was not successful. Previous RFCA ablation was not successful in two patients. Either a 150-cm eight-electrode pair (2–6–2 mm, 2.5 French) or a four-electrode pair (2–6–2 mm, 2.3 French) microcatheter (2.3 French octapolar microcatheter) was used.


Average time of the multielectrode RCA mapping was 42 ± 14.5 min. All eight (100%) APs were successfully ablated. No complications occurred.


Microcatheter-assisted coronary artery mapping during RFCA is a useful adjunctive mapping technique in children with difficult to map right-sided APs and patients with APs who has complex cardiovascular anomalies.


Accessory pathways Catheter ablation Children Coronary artery Mapping Microcatheter 


  1. 1.
    Kugler, J. D., Danford, D. A., Deal, B., Gillette, P., Perry, J., Silka, M., et al. (1994). Radiofrequency catheter ablation for tachyarrhythmias in children and adolescents. New England Journal of Medicine, 330, 1481–1487.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kugler, J. D., Danford, D. A., Houston, K., Felix, G., & Members of the EP Society. (1997). Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Registry: radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia in children and adolescents without structural heart disease. American Journal of Cardiology, 80, 1439–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kugler, J. D., Danford, D. A., Houston, K. A., & Felix, G. (2002). Pediatric Radiofrequency Ablation Registry of the Pediatric Radiofrequency Ablation Registry of the Pediatric Electrophysiology Society: pediatric radiofrequency catheter ablation registry success, fluoroscopy time, and complication rate for supraventricular tachycardia: comparison of early and recent eras. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 13, 336–341.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anderson, R. H., & Ho, S. Y. (1997). Anatomy of the atrioventricular junctions with regard to ventricular preexcitation. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 20, 2072–2076.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cappato, R., Schluter, M., Weiß, C., Antz, M., Koschyk, D. H., Hofmann, T., et al. (1996). Radiofrequency current catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathways in Ebstein’s anomaly. Circulation, 94, 376–383.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shah, M. J., Jones, T. K., & Cecchin, F. (2004). Improved localization of right-sided accessory pathways with microcatheter-assisted right coronary artery mapping in children. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 15, 1238–1243.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Van Hare, G. F., Javitz, H., Carmelli, D., Saul, J. P., Tanel, R. E., Fischbach, P. S., et al. (2004). Pediatric Electrophysiology Society: prospective assessment after pediatric cardiac ablation: demographics, medical profiles, and initial outcomes. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 15, 759–770.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van Hare, G. F., Dubin, A. M., & Collins, K. K. (2002). Invasive electrophysiology in children: state of the art. Journal of Electrocardiology, 35, 165–174.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Campbell, R. M., Strieper, M. J., Frias, P. A., Jeager, G., Balfour, G., Costello, L., et al. (2005). Quantifying and minimizing radiation exposure during pediatric cardiac catherization. Pediatric Cardiology, 26, 29–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fishberger, S. B., Hernandez, A., & Zahn, E. M. (2009). Electroanatomic mapping of the right coronary artery. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 20(5), 526–529.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bertram, H., Bökenkamp, R., Peuster, M., Hausforf, G., & Thomas, P. (2001). Coronary artery stenosis after radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathways in children with Ebstein’s malformation. Circulation, 103, 538–543.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pediatrics and Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Faculty of MedicineAtaturk UniversityErzurumTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Pediatrics and Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Faculty of MedicineHacettepe UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Pediatric Cardiology UnitAcibadem Maslak HospitalIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations