Skip to main content
Log in

Pulmonary vein isolation using segmental versus electroanatomical circumferential ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Over 3-year results of a prospective randomized study

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We tested the hypothesis that electroanatomic pulmonary vein (PV) antra encircling for the PV isolation will improve the outcome in treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), compared with segmental PV isolation.

Methods

Fifty-four patients underwent segmental PV isolation (group 1) and 56 patients circumferential PV isolation (group 2) for symptomatic PAF in a randomized study.

Results

Following single ablation procedure, at the 48 ± 8 month follow-up, 30 (56%) and 32 (57%) patients in groups 1 and 2 remained free of arrhythmia (P = 0.41). After repeat ablation, 43 (80%) and 45 (80%) patients in groups 1 and 2 were free of arrhythmia without antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs); 48 (89%) and 51 (91%) patients in groups 1 and 2 did not have arrhythmia recurrences without or with AADs.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates no advantage in long-term arrhythmia-free clinical outcome after circumferential PV isolation in patients with frequent PAF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haïssaguerre, M., Jaïs, P., Shah, D. C., et al. (2000). Electrophysiological endpoint for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation initiated from multiple pulmonary venous foci. Circulation, 101, 1409–1417. Medline.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Marrouche, N. F., Dresing, T., Cole, C., et al. (2002). Circular mapping and ablation of the pulmonary vein for treatment of atrial fibrillation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 40, 464–474. Medline DOI 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01972-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pappone, C., Rosanio, S., Oreto, G., et al. (2000). Circumferential radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary vein ostia: a new anatomic approach for curing atrial fibrillation. Circulation, 102, 2619–2628 Medline.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pappone, C., Oreto, G., Rosanio, S., et al. (2001). Atrial electroanatomic remodeling after circumferential radiofrequency pulmonary vein ablation: efficacy of an anatomic approach in a large cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation, 104, 2539–2544. Medline DOI 10.1161/hc4601.098517.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Oral, H., Scharf, C., Chugh, A., et al. (2003). Catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: segmental pulmonary vein ostial ablation versus left atrial ablation. Circulation, 108, 2355–2360. Medline DOI 10.1161/01.CIR.0000095796.45180.88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Karch, M. R., Zrenner, B., Deisenhofer, I., et al. (2005). Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a randomized comparison between 2 current ablation strategies. Circulation, 111, 2875–2880. Medline DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.491530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mansour, M., Ruskin, J., & Keane, D. (2004). Efficacy and safety of segmental ostial versus circumferential extra-ostial pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 15, 532–537. Medline.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ho, S. Y., Sanchez-Quintana, D., Cabrera, J. A., & Anderson, R. H. (1999). Anatomy of the left atrium: implications for radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 10, 1525–1533. Medline DOI 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1999.tb00211.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gerstenfeld, E. P., Guerra, P., Sparks, P. B., Hattori, K., & Lesh, M. D. (2001). Clinical outcome after radiofrequency catheter ablation of focal atrial fibrillation triggers. Journal Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 12, 900–908. Medline DOI 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.00900.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Macle, L., Jaïs, P., Weerasooriya, R., et al. (2002). Irrigated-tip catheter ablation of pulmonary veins for treatment of atrial fibrillation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 13, 1067–1073. Medline DOI 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.01067.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Saad, E. B., Rosillo, A., Saad, C. P., et al. (2003). Pulmonary vein stenosis after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: functional characterization, evolution, and influence of the ablation strategy. Circulation, 108, 3102–3107. Medline DOI 10.1161/01.CIR.0000104569.96907.7F.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pürerfellner, H., Cihal, R., Aichinger, J., Martinek, M., & Nesser, H. J. (2003). Pulmonary vein stenosis by ostial irrigated-tip ablation: incidence, time course, and prediction. Journal of Cardiovascilar Electrophysiology, 14, 158–164. Medline.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cappato, R., Negroni, S., Pecora, D., et al. (2003). Prospective assessment of late conduction recurrence across radiofrequency lesions producing electrical disconnection at the pulmonary vein ostium in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation, 108, 1599–1604. Medline DOI 10.1161/01.CIR.0000091081.19465.F1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ouyang, F., Antz, M., Ernst, S., et al. (2005). Recovered pulmonary vein conduction as a dominant factor for recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias after complete circular isolation of the pulmonary veins: lessons form the double Lasso technique. Circulation, 111, 127–135. Medline DOI 10.1161/01.CIR.0000151289.73085.36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lemola, K., Hall, B., Cheung, P., et al. (2004). Mechanisms of recurrent atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation by segmental ostial ablation. Heart Rhythm, 1, 197–202. Medline DOI 10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.03.071.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hsieh, M. H., Tai, C. T., Tsai, C. F., et al. (2003). Clinical outcome of very late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 14, 598–601. Medline DOI 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2003.03047.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ouyang, F., Bänsch, D., Ernst, S., et al. (2004). Complete isolation of the left atrium surrounding the pulmonary veins: new insights from the double-lasso technique in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circulation, 110, 2090–2096. Medline DOI 10.1161/01.CIR.0000144459.37455.EE.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nademanee, K., McKenzie, J., Kosar, E., et al. (2004). A new approach for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: mapping and the electrophysiologic substrate. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 43, 2044–2053. Medline DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.12.054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Haïssaguerre, M., Sanders, P., Hocini, M., et al. (2005). Catheter ablation of long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation: critical structures for termination. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 16, 1125–1137. Medline DOI 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.00307.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Oral, H., Chugh, A., Good, E., et al. (2007). Radiofrequency catheter ablation of chronic AF guided by complex electrograms. Circulation, 115, 2606–2612. Medline DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.691386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the Czech Ministry of Health IGA MZ NA7217-3/2002.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Fiala.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fiala, M., Chovančík, J., Nevřalová, R. et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using segmental versus electroanatomical circumferential ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 22, 13–21 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-008-9212-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-008-9212-7

Keywords

Navigation