Journal for General Philosophy of Science

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 29–48 | Cite as

Dennett’s Rhetorical Strategies in Consciousness Explained

  • Anthony A. Derksen


Dennett’s Consciousness Explained (1991) is an inspiring but also a highly frustrating book. The line of the argument seems to be clear, but then at second sight it fades away. It turns out that Dennett uses six of the seven strategies which I discuss in my “The Seven Strategies of the Sophisticated Pseudo-Scientist: A Look into Freud’s Rhetorical Tool Box” (J. Gen. Phil. Sci., 2001) Discussing important examples of these strategies I show why Consciousness Explained is such a frustrating book. As the examples used do not reflect minor problems but go to the heart of the matter and concern the book’s main areas of contention, it turns out that, in spite of the valuable and insightful details, Dennett’s materialistic view of consciousness is supported mainly by rhetorical sleights of hand.


Dennett Freud rhetorics rhetorical strategies phenomenal consciousness multiple draft theory of consciousness Cartesian Theater filling-in blind sight heterophenomenology 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Churchland, P. S. and Ramachandran, V. S. 1993, ‘Filling in: Why Dennett is Wrong’, in B. Dahlbom (ed.), Dennett and His Critics, Blackwell, Oxford, 28–51.Google Scholar
  2. Dennett, D. C. 1991, Consciousness Explained, Little, Brown and Co., Boston.Google Scholar
  3. Dennett, D. C. 1998, ‘No Bridge Over the Stream of Consciousness’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21, 753–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Derksen, A. A. 1993, ‘The Seven Sins of Pseudo-Science’, Journal for General Philosophy of Science 24, 17–42.Google Scholar
  5. Derksen, A. A. 2001, ‘The Seven Strategies of the Sophisticated Pseudo-Scientist: A Look Into Freud’s Rhetorical Tool Box’, Journal for General Philosophy of Science 32, 329–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jackson, F. 1982, ‘Epiphenomenal Qualities’, Philosophical Quarterly 32, 127–136.Google Scholar
  7. Pessoa, L., Thompson, E. and Noe, A. 1998, ‘Finding Out Filling-In: A Guide to Perceptual Completion for Visual Science and the Philosophy of Perception’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21, 723–746; and 781–802 (authors‧ response).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ramachandran, V. S. and Gregory, R. L. 1991, ‘Perceptual Filling in of Artificially Induced Scomatas in Human Vision’, Nature 350 (6329), 699–702.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Weiskrantz, L. 1995, ‘Blindsight: Conscious vs. Unconscious Aspects’, in J. King and K. H. Pribam (eds.), Scale in Conscious Experience: Is the Brain Too Important To Be Left to Specialists to Study?, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
  10. Weiskrantz, L. 1998, ‘Consciousness and Commentaries’, International Journal of Psychology 33, 272–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.JA NijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations