Dennett’s Rhetorical Strategies in Consciousness Explained
Dennett’s Consciousness Explained (1991) is an inspiring but also a highly frustrating book. The line of the argument seems to be clear, but then at second sight it fades away. It turns out that Dennett uses six of the seven strategies which I discuss in my “The Seven Strategies of the Sophisticated Pseudo-Scientist: A Look into Freud’s Rhetorical Tool Box” (J. Gen. Phil. Sci., 2001) Discussing important examples of these strategies I show why Consciousness Explained is such a frustrating book. As the examples used do not reflect minor problems but go to the heart of the matter and concern the book’s main areas of contention, it turns out that, in spite of the valuable and insightful details, Dennett’s materialistic view of consciousness is supported mainly by rhetorical sleights of hand.
KeywordsDennett Freud rhetorics rhetorical strategies phenomenal consciousness multiple draft theory of consciousness Cartesian Theater filling-in blind sight heterophenomenology
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Churchland, P. S. and Ramachandran, V. S. 1993, ‘Filling in: Why Dennett is Wrong’, in B. Dahlbom (ed.), Dennett and His Critics, Blackwell, Oxford, 28–51.Google Scholar
- Dennett, D. C. 1991, Consciousness Explained, Little, Brown and Co., Boston.Google Scholar
- Derksen, A. A. 1993, ‘The Seven Sins of Pseudo-Science’, Journal for General Philosophy of Science 24, 17–42.Google Scholar
- Jackson, F. 1982, ‘Epiphenomenal Qualities’, Philosophical Quarterly 32, 127–136.Google Scholar
- Weiskrantz, L. 1995, ‘Blindsight: Conscious vs. Unconscious Aspects’, in J. King and K. H. Pribam (eds.), Scale in Conscious Experience: Is the Brain Too Important To Be Left to Specialists to Study?, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar