Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 621–632 | Cite as

The Association Between Time Spent Using Entertainment Media and Marital Quality in a Contemporary Dyadic National Sample

Original Paper


This study used the Actor Partner Interdependence Model and a national sample of married couples (N = 1368) to explore the relationship between entertainment media use and marital satisfaction, conflict, and perceived marital instability. Entertainment media-use included newer types of media (e.g., social networking websites) as well as traditional media (e.g., television). A number of negative relationships between media use and wives’ and husbands’ marital quality emerged. Husbands’ use of social networking websites, in particular, was associated with many of the marital quality variables. The effect sizes of media use were small, however. We also explored whether the relationship worked in reverse and whether media use differences between the spouses would relate to marital quality. When spouses reported different levels of using video games, they also reported lower levels of marital quality. The findings suggest that as media technology continues to change, it may relate to marital quality in new ways.


Marriage Media Time use Technology Television Social networking websites Video games 



The authors would like to acknowledge a grant from the Science of Generosity Initiative at the University of Notre Dame that enabled us to collect the data used in this study. All statements in this study are the authors’.


  1. Ahlstrom, M., Lundberg, N. R., Zabriskie, R., Eggett, D., & Lindsay, G. B. (2012). Me, my spouse, and my avatar: The relationship between marital satisfaction and playing massively multiplayer online role-playing games (MMPORG’s). Journal of Leisure Research, 44, 1–22.Google Scholar
  2. Baym, N. K., Zhang, Y. B., Kunkel, A., Ledbetter, A., & Lin, M. C. (2007). Relational quality and media use in interpersonal relationships. New Media and Society, 9, 735–752. doi: 10.1177/1461444807080339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bryant, J., & Zillmann, D. (1984). Using television to alleviate boredom and stress: Selective exposure as a function of induced excitational states. Journal of Broadcasting, 28, 1–20. doi: 10.1080/08838158409386511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2010). American time use survey summary. Retrieved from
  5. Chesley, N. (2005). Blurring boundaries? Linking technology use, spillover, individual distress, and family satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1237–1248. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00213.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clayton, R. B., Nagurney, A., & Smith, J. R. (2013). Cheating, breakup, and divorce: Is Facebook use to blame? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 717–720. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cole, H., & Griffiths, M. D. (2007). Social interactions in massively multiplayer online role-playing gamers. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 10, 575–583. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.9988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2009). Who interacts on the Web? The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 247–253. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coyne, S. M., Busby, D., Bushman, B. J., Gentile, D. A., Ridge, R., & Stockdale, L. (2012). Gaming in the game of love: Effects of video games on conflict in couples. Family Relations, 61, 388–396. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00712.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coyne, S. M., Stockdale, L., Busby, D., Iverson, B., & Grant, D. M. (2011). “I luv u #xF04A;!”: A descriptive study of the media use of individuals in romantic relationships. Family Relations, 60, 150–162. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00639.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daly, K. (2003). Family theory versus the theories families live by. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 771–784. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00771.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dauphin, B., & Heller, G. (2010). Going to other worlds: The relationships between videogaming, psychological absorption, and daydreaming styles. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 169–172. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dew, J. P. (2007). Do you have the time? Changes in and implications of spouses’ time together (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from UMI (Order Number 3266098).Google Scholar
  14. Doran, K. & Price, J. (2014). Pornography and marriage. Journal of Family and Economic Issues. Advance online publication. doi:  10.1007/s10834-014-9391-6
  15. Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2010). Marriage in the new millennium: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 630–649. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00722.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gantz, W. (1985). Exploring the role of television in married life. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 29, 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Glorieux, I., Minnen, J., & van Tienoven, T. P. (2011). Spouse “together time”: Quality time within the household. Social Indicators Research, 101, 281–287. doi: 10.1007/s11205-010-9648-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hand, M. M., Thomas, D., Buboltz, W., Deemer, E., & Buyanjargal, M. (2013). Facebook and romantic relationships: Intimacy and couple satisfaction associated with online social network use. CyberPsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 8–16. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Henning, B., & Vorderer, P. (2001). Psychological escapism: Predicting the amount of television viewing by need for cognition. Journal of Communication, 51, 100–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02874.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hertlein, K. M., & Hawkins, B. P. (2012). Online gaming issues in offline couple relationships: A primer for marriage and family therapists (MFTs). The Qualitative Report, 17(15), 1–48.Google Scholar
  21. Hill, M. S. (1988). Marital stability and spouses’ shared time: A multidisciplinary hypothesis. Journal of Family Issues, 9, 427–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hughes, R., & Hans, J. D. (2001). Computers, the internet, and families: A review of the role new technology plays in family life. Journal of Family Issues, 22, 776–790. doi: 10.1177/019251301022006006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kashy, D. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 451–477). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kendall, T. D. (2011). The relationship between internet access and divorce rate. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 32, 449–460. doi: 10.1007/s10834-010-9222-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic Data Analysis. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lanigan, J. D. (2009). A sociotechnological model for family research and intervention: How information and communication technologies affect family life. Marriage and Family Review, 45, 587–609. doi: 10.1080/01494920903224194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Muise, A., Christofides, E., & Desmarais, S. (2009). More information than you ever wanted: Does Facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy? CyberPsychology and Behavior, 12, 441–444. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Networks, Knowledge. (2011). Knowledge Networks Project Report: Marital Generosity Survey. Menlo Park, CA: Knowledge Networks.Google Scholar
  29. Osborn, J. L. (2012). When TV and marriage meet: A social exchange analysis of the impact of television viewing on marital satisfaction and commitment. Mass Communication and Society, 15, 739–757. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2011.618900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Padilla-Walker, L. M., Nelson, L. J., Carroll, J. S., & Jensen, A. C. (2010). More than just a game: Video game and Internet use during emerging adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 103–113. doi: 10.1007/s10964-008-9390-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reinecke, L. (2009). Games and recovery: The use of video and computer games to recuperate from stress and strain. Journal of Media Psychology, 21, 126–142. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105.21.3.126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Robinson, J. P., & Godbey, G. (1999). Time for Life. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  33. Sublette, V. A., & Mullan, B. (2010). Consequences of play: A systematic review of the effects of online gaming. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, Online First. doi:  10.1007/s11469-010-9304-3
  34. Walker, K., Krehbiel, M., & Knoyer, L. (2009). “Hey you! Just stopping by to say hi!”: Communicating with friends and family on MySpace. Marriage and Family Review, 45, 677–696. doi: 10.1080/01494920903224251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yadama, G. N., & Pandey, S. (1995). Effect of sample size on goodness-of-fit indices in structural equation models. Journal of Social Service Research, 20, 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Family, Consumer, and Human DevelopmentUtah State UniversityLoganUSA
  2. 2.Family, Consumer, and Human DevelopmentUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations