Wealth Holdings and Portfolio Allocation of the Elderly: The Role of Marital History
- 241 Downloads
This paper investigates the role of marital history in terms of explaining differences in wealth holdings and portfolio allocation of older individuals by studying data from the first wave of Health and Retirement Study which was conducted in 1992. The results generally suggest that both men and women suffer from the negative shocks of past marital dissolutions in terms of household wealth accumulation. The significance level, however, differs across currently married couples, single males, and single females. The examination of the asset components of net worth also indicates that both the probability of owning a particular asset and the fraction of wealth allocated to that asset might vary depending on the elderly individuals’ marital history.
KeywordsWealth Portfolio allocation Elderly Marital history
- Bernheim, B. D., Skinner, J., & Weinberg, S. (2001). What accounts for the variation in retirement wealth among US households? American Economic Review, 91, 832–857.Google Scholar
- Cubeddu, L., & Rios-Rull, J. (1997). Marital risk and capital accumulation (Staff report no. 235). Minneapolis: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.Google Scholar
- Duflo, E., & Udry, C. (2004). Intrahousehold resource allocation in Cote d’Ivoire: Social norms, separate accounts and consumption choices (Working paper no. 10498). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Garfinkel, I. (1992). Assuring child support. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Guyer, J. (1997). Endowments and assets: The anthropology of wealth and the economics of intrahousehold allocation. In L. Haddad, et al. (Eds.), Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing countries: Models, methods, and policy (pp. 112–141). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Hoddinott, J., Alderman, H., & Haddad, L. (1997). Testing competing models of intrahousehold allocation. In L. Haddad, et al. (Eds.), Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing countries: Models, methods, and policy (pp. 129–141). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Hurd, M. D. (2002). Portfolio holdings of the elderly. In L. Guiso (Ed.), Household portfolios (pp. 431–472). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Kezdi, G., & Willis, R. (2003). Who becomes a stockholder? Expectations, subjective uncertainty, and asset allocation (Research paper no. WP 2003-039). Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Retirement Research Center.Google Scholar
- Kreider, R., & Fields, J. (2002). Number, timing, and duration of marriages and divorces: 1996 (Current Population Reports no. pp. 70–80). Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census. Retrieved May 04, 2008, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2002pubs/p70-80.pdf.
- Lupton, J. P., & Smith, J. P. (2003). Marriage, assets, and savings. In S. A. Grossbard-Shechtman (Ed.), Marriage and the economy (pp. 129–152). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Lusardi, A. (1999). Information, expectations, and savings for retirement. In H. J. Aaron (Ed.), Behavioral dimensions of retirement economics (pp. 81–124). Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Poterba, J., & Samwick, A. (1997). Household portfolio allocation over the life cycle (Working paper no. 6185). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Poterba, J., & Samwick, A. (1999). Taxation and household portfolio composition: U.S. evidence from the 1980s and 1990s (Working paper no. 7392). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Scoon-Rogers, L., & Lester, G. H. (1995). Child support for custodial mothers and fathers:1991 (Current Population Reports no. pp. 60–187). Washington, D.C: U.S. Bureau of the Census. Retrieved May 04, 2008, from http://www2.census.gov/prod2/popscan/p60-187.pdf.
- Wilkinson, R. G. (1996). Unhealthy societies: The afflictions of inequality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Wise, D., & Venti, S. (1998). The cause of wealth dispersion at retirement: Choice or chance? American Economic Review, 88, 185–191.Google Scholar