Journal of Educational Change

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 1–17 | Cite as

Engaging with the views of students to promote inclusion in education

Article

Abstract

The argument developed in this paper is set within the context of an increasing global concern to promote inclusion in education. Drawing on the authors’ research over many years, it argues that an engagement with the views of students can lead to changes in understandings and practices that help to facilitate the development of more inclusive approaches in schools. At the same time, these experiences show how such processes can lead to ‘interruptions’ in the work of those in schools in ways that may challenge the status quo and sometimes lead to negative reactions. It is argued, however, that, under appropriate organisational conditions, such approaches can lead to dialogue between students and teachers that stimulates actions to promote inclusion in education. The paper concludes by outlining how such conditions can be promoted, focusing in particular on issues related to cultures and leadership.

Keywords

Change Cultures Dialogue Inclusive education Leadership Students’ voices Schools 

References

  1. Ainscow, M. (2000). Profile. In P. Clough & J. Corbett (Eds.), Theories of inclusive education (pp. 39–42). London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
  2. Ainscow, M. (2005). Developing inclusive education systems: What are the levers for change? Journal of Educational Change, 6(2), 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ainscow, M. (2016). Struggles for equity in education: The selected works of Mel Ainscow. London: Routledge World Library of Educationalists series.Google Scholar
  4. Ainscow, M., Booth, T., Dyson, A., Farrell, P., Frankham, J., Gallannaugh, F., et al. (2006). Improving schools, developing inclusion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Ainscow, M., Dyson, A., Goldrick, S., & West, M. (2012). Developing equitable education systems. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Ainscow, M., Dyson, A., Goldrick, S., & West, M. (2016). Using collaborative inquiry to foster equity within school systems: Opportunities and barriers. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(1), 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ainscow, M., & Kaplan, I. (2005). Using evidence to encourage inclusive school development: Possibilities and challenges. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 29(2), 12–21.Google Scholar
  8. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organisational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  9. Barton, L. (1997). Inclusive education: Romantic, subversive or realistic? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1(3), 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cook-Sather, A. (2002). Authorizing students’ perspectives: Toward trust, dialogue, and change in education. Educational Researcher, 31(4), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cunninghame, C., Aslam, P. F., Kirby, J. Oldham, & Newton, S. (1999). Report on the Whitley Abbey Community School Project. Smethwick: Save the Children.Google Scholar
  12. Dyson, A., Howes, A., & Roberts, B. (2004). What do we really know about inclusive schools? A systematic review of the research evidence. In D. Mitchell (Ed.), Special educational needs and inclusive education: Major themes in education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Fielding, M. (2004). Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fielding, M., & Bragg, S. (2003). Students as researchers, making a difference. Cambridge: Pearson.Google Scholar
  15. Fox, S., & Messiou, K. (2004). Manchester inclusion standard: Pupil voice toolkit. Manchester: Manchester City Council.Google Scholar
  16. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Hargreaves, D. H. (2011). Leading a self-improving school system. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.Google Scholar
  18. Harris, J., Carrington, S., Ainscow, M., Comber, B., Ehrich, L., Klenowski, V., et al. (2017). Promoting equity in schools: Collaboration, inquiry and ethical leadership. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Hope, M. (2012). The importance of belonging: Learning from the student experience of democratic education. Journal of School Leadership, 22(4), 733–750.Google Scholar
  20. Hopkins, D., Ainscow, M., & West, M. (1994). School improvement in an era of change. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  21. Kaplan, I. (2008). Being ‘seen’ being ‘heard’: Engaging with students on the margins of education through participatory photography. In P. Thomson (Ed.), Doing visual research with children and young people. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Kugelmass, J. W. (2004). The inclusive school: Sustaining equity and standards. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lambert, L., Walker, D., Zimmerman, D., Cooper, J., Lambert, M., Gardner, M., et al. (1995). The constructivist leader. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  24. Leat, D., & Reid, A. (2012). Exploring the Role of Student Researchers in the Process of Curriculum Development. The Curriculum Journal, 23(2), 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lodge, C. (2005). From hearing voices to engaging in dialogue: Problematising student participation in school improvement. Journal of Educational Change, 6, 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Messiou, K. (2002). Marginalisation in primary schools: Listening to children’s voices. Support for Learning, 17(3), 117–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Messiou, K. (2003). Conversations with children: A pathway towards understanding marginalisation and inclusive education. Unpublished PhD thesis: University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  29. Messiou, K. (2006). Understanding marginalisation in education: The voice of children. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XXI(3), 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Messiou, K. (2012). Confronting marginalisation in education: A framework for promoting inclusion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Messiou, K. (2017). Research in the field of inclusive education: time for a rethink? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(2), 146–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Messiou, K., & Ainscow, M. (2015). Responding to learner diversity: Student views as a catalyst for powerful teacher development? Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 246–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Messiou, K., Ainscow, M., Echeita, G., Goldrick, S., Hope, M., Paes, I., et al. (2016). Learning from differences: A strategy for teacher development in respect to student diversity. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(1), 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Messiou, K., & Hope, M. (2015). The danger of subverting students’ views in schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(10), 1009–1021.Google Scholar
  35. Mitra, D. L. (2003). Student voice in school reform: Reframing student–teacher relationships. McGill Journal of Education, 38(2), 289–304.Google Scholar
  36. Mitra, D. L. (2004). The significance of students: Can increasing ‘student voice’ in schools lead to gains in youth development? Teachers College Record, 106(4), 651–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mitra, D. L. (2008). Balancing power in communities of practice: An examination of increasing student voice through school-based youth-adult partnerships. Journal of Educational Change, 9, 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mitra, D. L., & Serriere, S. C. (2012). Student voice in elementary school reform: Examining youth development in fifth graders. American Educational Research Journal, 49(4), 743–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moore, M., Jackson, M., Fox, S., & Ainscow, M. (2004). Manchester inclusion standard: Guidance for schools. Manchester: Manchester City Council.Google Scholar
  40. O’Neill, O. (2013). Intelligent accountability in education. Oxford Review of Education, 39(1), 4–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Opertti, R., Walker, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Inclusive education: From targeting groups and schools to achieving quality education as the core of EFA. In L. Florian (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of special education (2 nd Revised Edition). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  42. Senge, P. M. (1989). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organisation. London: Century.Google Scholar
  43. Timperley, S. H., & Robinson, V. M. J. (2001). Achieving school improvement through challenging and changing teachers’ schema. Journal of Educational Change, 2, 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tomlinson, S. (2012). The irresistible rise of the SEN industry. Oxford Review of Education, 38(3), 267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Trent, S. C., Artiles, A. J., & Englert, C. S. (1998). From deficit thinking to social constructivism: A review of theory, research and practice in special education. Review of Research in Education, 23, 277–307.Google Scholar
  46. UNESCO. (2017). A guide for ensuring inclusion and equity in education. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  47. Wilson, S. (2000). Schooling for democracy. Youth Studies Australia, 19(2), 25–32.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.University of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations